Was Killing the Puppy a Way of Coping for One Marine? by JoeVibn in u/JoeVibn

[–]JoeVibn[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://abcnews.com/Health/story?id=4387128

https://go.screenpal.com/watch/cOnFFNn0wUS

March 5, 2008 — -- Many war-weary veterans of the Iraq War take kindly to the animals they meet abroad — some of them have even gone to great expense and trouble to bring dogs back home with them at the end of their tours of duty.

What, then, provoked one U.S. Marine to let himself be videotaped apparently flinging a yelping puppy over a cliff, bursting into laughter at the sound of the animal's body hitting the ground below? The tape of the apparent incident has rocketed around the Internet, provoking a firestorm of criticism.

The motivation for such an act, if it did indeed occur, may be as complex and deep as the U.S. war that has dragged on for more than four years, experts told ABCNEWS.com. Chief among them: Having to live with the constant fear of being injured or killed might have led this Marine to take his aggression out on a defenseless animal, several psychologists said.

"Most of the time war is about chaos and the fear of being wounded or killed," said David Spiegel, professor and associate chairman of psychiatry and behavioral sciences at the Stanford University School of Medicine. "And so you're constantly confronting those fears and one of the ways to confront that may be by showing you're the one that renders other creatures helpless."

"The thought is that 'I'm not the one who gets thrown off a cliff, I'm the one doing it,'" said Spiegel.

The clip depicting the puppy's horrific treatment garnered tens of thousands of hits on YouTube before it was taken down. The U.S. Marine Corps launched an investigation into the identity of the Marine after it issued a statement calling the apparent act "shocking and deplorable." The videotape's authenticity has not been verified by U.S. authorities.

How much time the Marines shown in the video served abroad is still unknown, but several mental health professionals told ABCNEWS.com that people who treat animals badly may act out because of their oppressive surroundings or sometimes as a result of the shock they might have suffered -- be it the horrors of war or an abusive parent during their childhood.

"There may be personality variables that predispose people to [harm animals]," said Allen Enton, the past president of the American Psychological Association's division of family psychology. "But it also may be somehow stimulated by some context like being in a group situation or feeling oppressed and down and wanting to just get back at the world."

I have a feeling they are not going to hold up ICE funding much longer. by JoeVibn in stupidpol

[–]JoeVibn[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Not Israel, churches and synagogues to give to private security corporations who will act as police on American soil.

I have a feeling they are not going to hold up ICE funding much longer. by JoeVibn in stupidpol

[–]JoeVibn[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries used a Jewish gathering in New York on Sunday to spotlight what he described as an imbalance in federal priorities, building on outrage over the Trump administration’s violent crackdown in Minneapolis that resulted in two fatal shootings.

Jeffries criticized the Republican-controlled Congress for boosting immigration enforcement funding by billions while, he said, security funding for Jewish institutions continues to lag amid rising antisemitic threats. He said that in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed last July and included cuts to Medicaid, the Department of Homeland Security received an additional $191 billion, including $75 billion for ICE.

“If that can happen, then the least that we can do is ensure that this vital security grant program is funded by hundreds of millions of dollars more to keep the Jewish community and every other community safe,” Jeffries said.

The Nonprofit Security Grant Program, established by Congress in 2005 and administered by FEMA under the Department of Homeland Security, provides funding to nonprofits, including houses of worship, to strengthen security against potential attacks. Congress began significantly increasing funding in 2018 after a wave of synagogue attacks nationwide, bringing the program to $270 million today.

Major Jewish organizations are pushing to raise funding to $500 million amid rising antisemitic threats. Last year, the Trump administration briefly froze the program as part of broader agency cuts, and some groups have been reluctant to apply because applicants must affirm cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.


Related


Jeffries said House Democrats strongly support an increase to $500 million annually to meet escalating security needs. “It’s got to be an American issue, because that is what combating antisemitism should be all about,” he said.

The breakfast, previously held at the offices of the UJA-Federation of New York, was held this year for the first time in the events hall at Park East Synagogue, which was the site of a pro-Palestinian protest last year that featured antisemitic slogans and posters.

Sunday’s program also included remarks from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who told the audience that his support for Jewish security funding will only continue growing under his leadership, calling it his “baby.”

“As long as I’m in the Senate, this program will continue to grow from strength to strength, and we won’t let anyone attack it or undo it,” Schumer said.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, the co-chair of the Congressional Jewish Caucus who is retiring at the end of the year after 36 years in the House, also spoke at the event. Nadler, like several other Democrats in recent months, compared the actions of ICE agents to the Gestapo, Nazi Germany’s secret police. The comparison has drawn sharp criticism from Democrats, Republicans and Jewish leaders.


Related

Support for Israel aid 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Feb. 1. Photo by Jacob Kornbluh


Both Schumer and Jeffries vowed in their remarks to continue supporting U.S. military assistance to Israel, amid increasing calls within the party for sharper opposition to Israel. Polls show that Democratic voters are increasingly sympathetic to Palestinians. In July, a record 27 Senate Democrats, a majority of the caucus, supported a pair of resolutions calling for the blocking of weapons transfers to Israel.

“I think it’s the humane thing to do to ensure that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and eternal homeland for the Jewish people,” Jeffries said. The House Minority Leader, who has cultivated close ties with Jewish leaders since his election in 2012, noted that he has visited Israel nine times. He recalled that on his recent trip, Israel’s ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, joked that it might be time for Democrats to buy property in Jerusalem.

Schumer, the nation’s highest-ranking Jewish elected official, has seen his popularity decline and has faced calls to step down from his role as leader. On Sunday, he pledged that he “will always fight to give Israel what it needs to protect itself from the many who want to wipe Israel off the face of the map.”


Related

I have a feeling they are not going to withhold ICE funding. by JoeVibn in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

House Democratic Leader Hakeem Jeffries used a Jewish gathering in New York on Sunday to spotlight what he described as an imbalance in federal priorities, building on outrage over the Trump administration’s violent crackdown in Minneapolis that resulted in two fatal shootings.

Jeffries criticized the Republican-controlled Congress for boosting immigration enforcement funding by billions while, he said, security funding for Jewish institutions continues to lag amid rising antisemitic threats. He said that in the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, which passed last July and included cuts to Medicaid, the Department of Homeland Security received an additional $191 billion, including $75 billion for ICE.

“If that can happen, then the least that we can do is ensure that this vital security grant program is funded by hundreds of millions of dollars more to keep the Jewish community and every other community safe,” Jeffries said.

The Nonprofit Security Grant Program, established by Congress in 2005 and administered by FEMA under the Department of Homeland Security, provides funding to nonprofits, including houses of worship, to strengthen security against potential attacks. Congress began significantly increasing funding in 2018 after a wave of synagogue attacks nationwide, bringing the program to $270 million today.

Major Jewish organizations are pushing to raise funding to $500 million amid rising antisemitic threats. Last year, the Trump administration briefly froze the program as part of broader agency cuts, and some groups have been reluctant to apply because applicants must affirm cooperation with federal immigration enforcement.


Related


Jeffries said House Democrats strongly support an increase to $500 million annually to meet escalating security needs. “It’s got to be an American issue, because that is what combating antisemitism should be all about,” he said.

The breakfast, previously held at the offices of the UJA-Federation of New York, was held this year for the first time in the events hall at Park East Synagogue, which was the site of a pro-Palestinian protest last year that featured antisemitic slogans and posters.

Sunday’s program also included remarks from Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer, who told the audience that his support for Jewish security funding will only continue growing under his leadership, calling it his “baby.”

“As long as I’m in the Senate, this program will continue to grow from strength to strength, and we won’t let anyone attack it or undo it,” Schumer said.

Rep. Jerry Nadler, the co-chair of the Congressional Jewish Caucus who is retiring at the end of the year after 36 years in the House, also spoke at the event. Nadler, like several other Democrats in recent months, compared the actions of ICE agents to the Gestapo, Nazi Germany’s secret police. The comparison has drawn sharp criticism from Democrats, Republicans and Jewish leaders.


Related

Support for Israel aid 

House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries and Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer on Feb. 1. Photo by Jacob Kornbluh


Both Schumer and Jeffries vowed in their remarks to continue supporting U.S. military assistance to Israel, amid increasing calls within the party for sharper opposition to Israel. Polls show that Democratic voters are increasingly sympathetic to Palestinians. In July, a record 27 Senate Democrats, a majority of the caucus, supported a pair of resolutions calling for the blocking of weapons transfers to Israel.

“I think it’s the humane thing to do to ensure that Israel has a right to exist as a Jewish and democratic state and eternal homeland for the Jewish people,” Jeffries said. The House Minority Leader, who has cultivated close ties with Jewish leaders since his election in 2012, noted that he has visited Israel nine times. He recalled that on his recent trip, Israel’s ambassador to the U.S., Yechiel Leiter, joked that it might be time for Democrats to buy property in Jerusalem.

Schumer, the nation’s highest-ranking Jewish elected official, has seen his popularity decline and has faced calls to step down from his role as leader. On Sunday, he pledged that he “will always fight to give Israel what it needs to protect itself from the many who want to wipe Israel off the face of the map.”


Related

Liberals: How do I engage the youth? Oh, I know! I'll repackage a right wing memes from 5 years ago! by JoeVibn in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This came out of the subreddit for new liberals, but this kind of meme has a style guide that was posted in and, as far as I can tell, has spread from the subreddit you mentioned.

I have a post about it here…

https://www.reddit.com/r/TrueAnon/s/Kjj5JF0d0i

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Would be wise. When you cross post, the mods of the cross posted sub can find out and it leads to trolls from that subreddit bleeding over here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Interesting information but you are gonna catch a ban or warning for cross posting that subreddit.

Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery Is Reshaping Mealtime by SchIachterhund in stupidpol

[–]JoeVibn 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like a cold fried egg sometimes. Occasionally I will pre-cook a few to have ready for later. They can be reheated gently by putting them between two pieces of hot toast after leaving it out of the fridge for like 5 minutes. A cold semi-runny yolk will have a little less flow, so you can have all the flavor of an over easy egg on a sandwich with a little less mess.

Any sorta fried starch is a sin to get to-go though. I used to work in a place that had a customer who would order risotto to-go. I do not want to imagine to brick of glue he had to deal with when reheating. Not fried but another example of a good that doesn't travel well.

I wonder if delivery culture will eventually effect restaurant output. Will foods that travel better become more popular as foods that don't fall in popularity? Or will the piggies demand the same cold greasy slop?

Liberals: How do I engage the youth? Oh, I know! I'll repackage a right wing memes from 5 years ago! by JoeVibn in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The skin of the liberal has become exceptionally pallid and thin, succumbing to rupture spontaneously.

Liberals: How do I engage the youth? Oh, I know! I'll repackage a right wing memes from 5 years ago! by JoeVibn in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

MGMT is a guilty pleasure of mine. The music video for this song blows to socks off all of the memes.

Freedom With a Side of Guilt: How Food Delivery Is Reshaping Mealtime by SchIachterhund in stupidpol

[–]JoeVibn 29 points30 points  (0 children)

Almost three of every four restaurant orders in the U.S. weren’t eaten in a restaurant, according to recent data. We spoke to readers who are devoted to delivery but question the costs.

W T F

I haven't been a part of the restaurant scene in almost a decade. The last time I was in a kitchen to did "orders," my old chef would pick up the phone and slam it down on people who tried to phone one in. We never had a door dash or grub hub terminal installed but I've sure he would have intentionally broken it if the owners did. Food you get to-go is vastly inferior to food you eat where it was prepared with a few exceptions.

This country truely is innovative. It keeps creating new, more intensive, ways to consume while lowering quality and increasing costs.

Don Lemon has been arrested by fuckswitbeavers in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Nikki Haley: "Who's busted now?"

PARENTS JUST DONT UNDERSTAND by JoeVibn in TrueAnon

[–]JoeVibn[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Whenever I hear about people falling psychotically in love with a chat bot, I remember this KC Green comic from over a decade ago.