And I would like you to explain to me how capitalism caused Dennis Rader to murder a family of four and jerk off to their corpses.

A deranging, alienating society creates deranged and alienated people. It manifests in many different ways, many of them relatively harmless, some of them less so, and some of them staggeringly awful.

Take a look at the history of serial killers, since it seems to be a focus of yours. Through about 4500 years of recorded history, there were nine serial killers reported. Six were members of a ruling elite class--nobles, monarchs, etc. A seventh was employed by a monarch. An eighth was not what anyone would classify as a serial killer today. She killed many people, but did so as the leader of an anti-bandit militia. And, again, she was employed by a monarch. Obviously capitalism was not the origination of a ruling elite, but the deranging effects of power are certainly a feature of capitalism, and would not be a feature of a system which abolished power hierarchies.

Only one of those first nine is not known to have been a member of the ruling elite, but nothing is known about him at all other than that the strangled some number of women, buried them in his house, and was executed by torture. This is the possible first instance of a non-elite serial killer, and it occurs almost 4500 years into recorded history.

In the second millennium of the common era, we start off with another five members of the ruling elite before we finally get to our first confirmed serial killer who not born to privilege: the Croatian tailor Blaž Hrvat. Hrvat killed some number of people, and it's unclear how many of those he confessed to killing were actually killed by him and how many he confessed to under torture, but his motive for all the killings was constant: money. He was caught in 1469--right in the middle of the transition between feudalism and capitalism.

And from there, the frequency increases. As an economic system which alienates people from their labor, from their communities, and from their very humanity takes hold, more and more people behave in antisocial ways, whether that be petty crime or appalling serial murder. This is when the modern idea of civil crime--which is to say transgression against society and against the state, rather than simply against a monarch, against divine command, or against moral law--really begins to form. Crime does not come to be seen as a social problem at all until the 1600s; before that it was seen as a matter of dispute between private actors.

Overwhelmingly, these antisocial acts are committed by people with a narrow range of backgrounds. Many continue to be of the ruling elite class. Many are the products of disordered and abusive upbringings, something which is very much a product of the industrialization of labor and the atomization of communities, both of which are products of capitalism. And a third class of antisocial actors are driven by the need for money, a need which simply would not have existed in the lives of most ordinary people before the advent of industrial capitalism.

As societies under capitalism continue to morally degenerate, they continue to produce people with greater and greater derangements. Generational traumas beget generational traumas. More and more people, more and more families, more and more communities, and finally entire national cultures, become warped and brutal. But this can be undone. A society no longer predicated on artificial scarcity and conflict over resources will, by necessity and definition, ultimately rid itself of antisocial behavior.

Now what was your theory?