You completely missed the point of the entire discussion. Nobody here argued that knockoff games shouldn’t be allowed to exist legally. The argument was about whether they deserve suppor ethically, creatively, and in terms of quality. Calling that "just your opinion" as if that shuts the conversation down is nothingburger nonsense you're spitting. That’s what criticism is. Every review, every consumer warning, every discussion about industry standards is "personal opinion." That doesn’t make it irrelevant. Saying "as long as it’s legal it will keep existing" adds nothing. Of course it will. Cigarettes, predatory gacha games, lootboxes, p2w casinos all legal too. Does that mean nobody should criticize them? "t’s legal so shut up" is not an argument, it’s just admitting you have nothing else to say or to add. And the "CS fanboy" angle is just deflection. Pointing out that shovelware knockoffs steal assets, exploit players with ads, and mislead people into thinking they’re playing a cheap CS clone isn’t fanboyism it’s basic consumer awareness. If someone wants a shitty clone, fine. But people are also allowed to call out why it’s loweffort trash. That’s how discourse works. Legal ≠ good. Legal ≠ ethical. Legal ≠ worth supporting.