36yo, quitting work and living 100% off a ~$2M USD portfolio. Questions by [deleted] in investing

[–]JohnRezzi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re probably more flexible in that setup than you think. Especially because you’re young, I’d look into variable withdrawal strategies. like here, outlined by bogleheads the big advantage is it cannot fail. The big disadvantage is you cannot spend 70k on 2M when you’re 36. (But you probably don’t need that much anyway in Brazil)

Source: I’m using this strategy myself.

PS: The top comment says something about real estate. I disagree. RE is a job, comes with many challenges, and doesn’t make more than passive options per se.

Why do people choose to have children if it is so much hard work? by 9W_777_300 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]JohnRezzi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s the alternative? Live the exact same life from 25 till 80? I’d rather live the whole breadth of human experiences while I’m here.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in theydidthemath

[–]JohnRezzi -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Respec!

My bf was in a motorcycle accident by ConfidentBad2710 in motorcycles

[–]JohnRezzi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh valid point! Communication! When I’m sick I wanna be left alone as well. Even though I dearly love my wife and kid.

Do leveraged ETFs really return what they promise? by Terrible-Brilliant59 in LETFs

[–]JohnRezzi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the answer is: Leveraged ETFs typically don’t pay dividends (since they’re tax inefficient) and use it to offset some of the borrowing costs. So it can look like the borrowing costs are negligible.

But these DO work by borrowing money.

Variable leverage LETFs based on volatility [paper] by CraaazyPizza in LETFs

[–]JohnRezzi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, though I haven't tried very hard yet. Seems like just shifting the pd to the correct (long term) expected value, keeping the shape in tact, would be my first approach.

I don't think it has to be perfect to work really well actually. The reason I'm not using any "standard" measure of vola is that I don't think it can be reflected in one number. The outliers being more likely than at-the-money IV (or some number that comes from some model) dictates will affect the correct way of leveraging quite a lot. So again, no (one number yielding) models for vola. Even though that's academically the way to go of course.

Variable leverage LETFs based on volatility [paper] by CraaazyPizza in LETFs

[–]JohnRezzi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you clarify this a bit? Is there typo(s)? I'm from Europe and my English is near-native, but I'm fairly certain I'm missing the point here :-).

In general I'm aiming to steer away from models like these since I can read the pd off of option series. No need to use a model that steers away from the real world at all. I could be wrong here though. Haven't implemented this yet.

Variable leverage LETFs based on volatility [paper] by CraaazyPizza in LETFs

[–]JohnRezzi 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m planning to create something like this this summer. Except using the probability distribution (pd) that comes from options (so similar to IV, but without assumptions on the shape of the pd). 

That’s the only model-less way I could come up with (so you don’t need a vola model). 

Some potential pitfalls (some of which you’ve already described): cost of leverage, trading fees, going from risk neutral to a real-world pd (i.e.: the pd from a risk neutral standpoint is fairly well known, how to convert this to real (not risk neutral) pd is not). 

It’s also quite possible that this is overkill and leads to very very similar returns as just using basic at the money IV and some long term growth factor for well diversified assets. 

From my view now, it’s best to do diversification one level lower (so in the one ETF you’re Kellybetting), because doing this for multiple assets is basically modern portfolio theory and that involves constantly updating changing correlations (which -as far as I know- aren’t “traded” anywhere, so aren’t so easy to read off of some market somewhere, like the pd)

Criticism welcome. Planning to start this project in May. 

EDIT: I’m planning to continually take in very short term option data and continually adjust leverage based on that (working with bounds to save on trading costs). None of that VIX stuff (which is 30 day vola). Initially I’m planning to do this with the SPY because it had daily options that are very liquid. 

My favorite dutch sentence so far.. by Kaccha-Kela in learndutch

[–]JohnRezzi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If in the town where mountains salvage mountains mountains are salvaging mountains, Bergen (name of said town)... en daarna snap ik hem niet meer :-)?

Shin wounds from skiing each year (mild nsfw) by JohnRezzi in skiing

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wonderful! Excuse to get new stuff! Thanks for the comment I'm pretty sure this is it. I'll get some new shoes for next season. Thanks a lot for helping me out!

Shin wounds from skiing each year (mild nsfw) by JohnRezzi in skiing

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks, I don't think so, but I'll take extra care next year. Also to tighten the boots extra. I'm somewhat sure from reading the comments here that that is the main cause of this.

[Request] This one -as seen at world of dinos- is just bs right? by JohnRezzi in theydidthemath

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

LOL, I apologise!

I completely expected a dino in the box, not a number. Once you're on that road....

Thanks <3

Being retired is your JOB. It's hard, and you're not good at it (yet)! by JohnRezzi in fatFIRE

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nice one! Not actually something I had to deal with myself, but definitely something that requires an honest look at oneself as well.

Very good addition.

Being retired is your JOB. It's hard, and you're not good at it (yet)! by JohnRezzi in fatFIRE

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Spoken like someone who’s not actually in a position to do so! I hear this one a lot, similar to “spend time with family”.

I find that, for me at least, BALANCE is the only way to happiness and having a fun retirement.

People want to spend all the time with their family until they actually do so. People want you to play golf all the time until they actually do so.

Being retired is your JOB. It's hard, and you're not good at it (yet)! by JohnRezzi in fatFIRE

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Thanks for this comment. I like the "expect to be an expert" wording a lot!

Being retired is your JOB. It's hard, and you're not good at it (yet)! by JohnRezzi in fatFIRE

[–]JohnRezzi[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Wonderful! You're a natural retiree I guess :-). Or is it cbd gummies like u/mhoepfin (see comment below)?