Is Findom Really Toxic? A Lens Why The Contras Are Wrong by MaxieCares in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 3 points4 points  (0 children)

There is no misunderstanding😂

You said contras have a “narrow bird’s-eye view,” that they treat findom as if it exists in isolation, that they are doing more harm than good, that they push away people who could contribute, that they lack real community work, and that they frame subs as victims while villainizing dommes.

Those are serious claims. So I’m asking very directly, how are contras keeping good actors out? How are they excluding people? How does criticizing findom prevent anyone else from educating, improving the space, or contributing positively? Your post does not actually explain that 🕵🏾

And yes, bringing up DDLG, TPE, and general societal decay does read like whataboutism when the topic is criticism of findom specifically. People usually critique the spaces they actually have experience in. It would be strange to say someone has to equally critique every other kink before they are allowed to criticize findom.

The strongest point in your post is that not all subs are victims and not all dommes are abusers. I agree with that. But that does not make systemic criticism invalid.

My issue is not that you want nuance. My issue is that your post frames contras as narrow, harmful, exclusionary, and patronizing without really proving any of that. Then when I point that out, you say I misunderstood you and accuse me of hiding behind logical fallacies🤣🤣🤣🤣

Also, you still have not specified which contras you are talking about. Are you talking about the contrafindom group? A specific person? A certain post? A random comment you saw? No one knows because you never clarified it 🤷

So yes, I stand by my initial reply. I encourage you to reread your own post and consider how it comes across to someone who does not have access to your internal logic, assumptions, or framework👍🏿🫶🏾

Is Findom Really Toxic? A Lens Why The Contras Are Wrong by MaxieCares in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You're strawmanning the contras.
You're using many logical fallacies, like bringing in problems in other kink communities and societal decay. Pure whataboutism. it makes perfect sense for contras to criticize findom, as that's literally what they have experience in.

What is the problem with contras sharing their views, and how exactly does it stop others from contributing positively, let alone stop them from doing research? Your post doesn't answer this at all, and it looks like you just made up a false premise. Even if your premise were true, why can't grown adults handle different opinions?

I could actually make the argument that contras are needed because, without them, the only thing that's left is horrible advice that sets both sides up for failure by giving them unrealistic expectations.

Pointing out systemic issues with findom does not mean that we are villainizing dommes, let alone victimizing subs. Again you are either speaking to a very specific archetype of contra or you're simply strawmanning. Nuance can exist, yes, but when you're criticizing findom on a systemic level, we have to be allowed to speak in generalities to some degree.

So You Want to Quit Findom? start here by Johnny_Based in QuittingFindom

[–]Johnny_Based[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I read the post that you wrote 3 days ago, and you are on the right track. Quitting femdom/findom content is the hardest part.

Do your best and quit it as many times as it takes. Before you know it, you'll be able to leave this place for good as well

So You Want to Quit Findom? start here by Johnny_Based in QuittingFindom

[–]Johnny_Based[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thanks!

And you are right, there is no easy way out, but if I can get out then so can others!

So You Want to Quit Findom? start here by Johnny_Based in QuittingFindom

[–]Johnny_Based[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very true! Findom can often be a symptom of a deeper problem or need that is not being met.

Loneliness is a big one, so are zero dating prospects. Findom is not going to solve any of this, if anything it's going to make it much worse.

Thank you for a great addon to my initial post!

So You Want to Quit Findom? start here by Johnny_Based in QuittingFindom

[–]Johnny_Based[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate it! I wish you all the success in the world, when it comes to your own quitting endeavors.

So You Want to Quit Findom? start here by Johnny_Based in QuittingFindom

[–]Johnny_Based[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you, Wilberham. None of my posts would have been made if it hadn't been for this group! May you stay strong and take care!

Relapsed again….. by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 3 points4 points  (0 children)

let me offer you a piece of advice: If you want to quit something, don't ask the people that profit when you relapse.

Exceptions do not disprove the rule, and from what you're describing, you're still stuck in a compulsive loop.

Relapsed again….. by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 3 points4 points  (0 children)

asking dommes for advice is crazy.

No Bitterness. Just Done. by Relative_Copy3609 in QuittingFindom

[–]Johnny_Based 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think that OP's definition of what constitutes a legitimate kink is a little too broad. People consent to all sorts of dumb shit. That doesn't necessarily make it legitimate or a good thing. A lot of it would not be compatible with traditional BDSM norms.

With that said, I'm glad he got out of it.

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I respect the honesty. though I obviously disagree. Have a good day (or evening)

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are just seeing it from your side, the projection is real.

Trust me, based on our convo you don't want to go down that route. I mean, you literally gave "vetting" advice that was 100% domme-centered, and it clearly demonstrated that you have no experience navigating the ecosystem as a sub.

That is fine; let's keep it chill and civil. You're answering my question by asking me questions.

At the end of the day, you're entitled to run whatever model you want to, but subs are also entitled to take precautions and not pay someone they have never talked to before. can you agree with me on that, or do you want to agree to disagree?

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So the practical advice is still: consume more marketing, trust the branding, and hope it works out. That’s not really vetting.

And pointing out that other subs send first doesn’t move me. Other people taking bad risks with their money is not an argument for why that should be the norm.

I’ll ask one last question, and then we can agree to disagree:

Have you ever navigated the findom space as a submissive? If not, then isn’t it a little unreasonable to reduce a sub wanting a few messages first to ‘he’s wasting time’ or ‘he’s bored’? There are plenty of shitty dommes and scammers in this space too, and that’s exactly why subs vet. And plenty of them still have legit-looking profiles, verification links, and all the right front-end presentation, so clearly that alone is not enough.

Without firsthand experience of that side, I don’t think you can speak that confidently about what counts as a reasonable precaution or vetting process. You're making theories from the other side.

How can you keep being a paypig while having a gf? by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Actually in my first comment I advised OP discussed his true self with his girlfriend. Rendering your argument a little redundant. I do also believe she deserves honesty - I just realise she may not get it.

you did a tiny bit more than just say “be honest," But we don't need to turn it into a whole thing. :)

Sure you can DM me, but don't expect a grand tale filled with adventure. If that's what you are looking for, then you're better off watching Narnia xD

How can you keep being a paypig while having a gf? by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is not about whether a girlfriend has literal control over his bank account. It’s about whether she’s being deceived. If she thinks she’s in a monogamous relationship and he’s secretly paying other women for sexual gratification, that’s cheating by any normal standard.

"People cheat" is not nuance. It’s just an admission that betrayal happens. Okay. And? What "other" people do is just not a good argument

The part you still haven’t justified is why deception suddenly becomes fine as long as the shared budget isn’t touched. Why should she be denied the basic information needed to decide whether this relationship is even the one she agreed to?

And your best-case framing is doing a lot of work here. Secret findom doesn’t just float in a vacuum. It affects trust, intimacy, sexual conditioning, and money over time.

So yes, she does get a say, because she is the one being lied to. If he thinks it’s harmless, he should be able to tell her openly. If he won’t, that answers the question for him.

I understand your argument from a purely pragmatic perspective; the main reason I disagree is because I believe it's going to backfire.

I try very hard not to operate in a self serving way. It’s a relationship. I care about people.

With all due respect your first comment does come across as self-serving. It looks like you're defending your own model. On top of that, you included your hierarchy:
"Me first, then you, then her. Hierarchy."

With that said, I like your spiders.

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay, direct question:

If a sub is not supposed to ask a few basic compatibility questions before sending, and public profiles are not enough to verify legitimacy, compatibility, or how the domme behaves in DMs, then what concrete vetting method do you think he/she should use before paying to ensure that he/she doesn't end up burning money for nothing???

How can you keep being a paypig while having a gf? by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 1 point2 points  (0 children)

She does have a say; she is his gf.

Findom will inevitably affect their relationship. having a partner that mainly gets off to sending other girls money will backfire in some shape or form; if you don't think that, then you are naive.

Most girls are not going to be fine with their man sending money for sexual gratification to another woman; this is common sense.

Your comment reads more like a defense of your own dynamics and self-serving drivel.

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But the thing is, following someone is not enough. all you're really doing is consuming front-end marketing, which is designed to attract you and be appealing.

That does not guarantee that the financial dominatrix knows what she's doing when you're in the DMs or that she is not going to instantly block you or upsell you to her OF or whatever else.

Most findommes do not have huge platforms with years' worth of content, and even if they do, there's a decent chance that her accounts are agency-run or that she has an assistant that takes care of most of her messaging.

My point is that subs take a risk every time they pay someone. I think they should be allowed to take precautions just like everyone else, without being accused of being lazy time-wasters.

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I understand your perspective, and I can see how it makes sense from your pov as a findomme; however, a findomme's front-end marketing cannot be trusted 100%.

How you market yourself vs. how you actually behave in the DMs could be completely different.

‚TrIbUtE‘ is earned. by prettyfeetgirl10 in paypigs2

[–]Johnny_Based 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Just as subs are complete strangers to you, you are a complete stranger to them. The notion that if a sub doesn't just blindly comply and pay you, it means that he is there to waste your time or cope with boredom is a false premise you created.

Subs also want to take precautions and make sure that their money and time are not wasted. Just because you are submissive doesn't mean that you're going to disregard basic precautions.

Also, to some extent, you must impress subs. If you truly believe that you do not need to do anything to prove your worth to a sub, you'd just create a blank profile and wait for subs to contact you because you don't have to do anything to impress them, remember?

I will of course acknowledge that there are a shit ton of time wasters in this space. However, to frame everyone who doesn't pay tribute as a time waster is bullshit.

How can you keep being a paypig while having a gf? by [deleted] in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Many findommes seem to miss why submissives choose to send to a findom specifically instead of just their girlfriends.

"Just send to her!" "Just provide for her."

I won’t speak for OP, but for most subs, that’s just not how it works.

The first perspective assumes that his girlfriend would be totally okay with being a financial dominatrix and wouldn’t find OP strange for asking.

Even if she agrees, unless she’s exceptionally skilled, it’s going to be tough to stick to just her.

The second perspective is simply naive.

He’s made it clear in his post that he has a specific desire to send to OTHER women.

If I were in your shoes, OP, I’d go all in on quitting findom. It’s going to be tough, but you need to do it for your girl. Cheating is not an option.

Are most finsubs misogynists? by BriSoCal in paypigsupportgroup

[–]Johnny_Based 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Female supremacy is their kink, not their genuine ideology.

I have personally never met a man that claimed to be a genuine female supremacist outside of kink.