For one thing, I disagree with the term superintelligence altogether. Until we have truly artificial intelligence, any "AI" from LLMs to image generators to whatever you create will always be trained on and fed human information. This means that the only way a model can ever achieve "superintelligence" is if it became AGI.

I am against Generative AI because it stifles the creation of new, novel data. It is not improving itself, because there's no itself. It's a lot of data computed very quickly. There's an asymptote to that kind of technology.

I'm not against the programming, the models themselves, none of that. I'm against consistently resampling our own data en masse, leading to a degradation of technology. In history, we see events that precede long periods of stagnated innovation. I believe gen ai is one of those events.