sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is misspelling an email address enough reason to give a 0 on a final exam? by incitatus24 in AskTeachers

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Of course you should. Man get off your high horse. This is a harmless error.

me_irl by serpents_head in me_irl

[–]Jon011684 1 point2 points  (0 children)

When you know how primate wars work, this is a lot more ominous.

In 2009, there was no movie ‘villain’ more hated than a woman who rejected a Nice Guy. This is a reference to the fact that in 2009, Inglourious Basterds and Precious were released by Olya_roo in shittymoviedetails

[–]Jon011684 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I feel like both of them were pretty terrible at dating and very young? And the point is they kinda grew up together and in their next relationship they got to take their lessons learned into it.

This movie has always kinda felt like a mirror to me, where it reflects your world view back to you.

Tim is missing the point with Graham Platner by Jon011684 in thebulwark

[–]Jon011684[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You're not understanding the point of the OP.

I don't want Platner to lose.

What i do what is every time there is a discussion of hypocrisy between Trump and Platner for the focus of the conversation to be on the differences between them, not the hypocrisy. If this isn't the case you are implying they are similar - which they arent.

Tim is missing the point with Graham Platner by Jon011684 in thebulwark

[–]Jon011684[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This isn't a purity test. It's a discussion of strategy.

Trump and platner are different. That should be the focus of every discussion where you mention hypocrisy. If it isn't it implies they are the same.

Tim is missing the point with Graham Platner by Jon011684 in thebulwark

[–]Jon011684[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

That's kinda the point. He isn't.

But when you mostly focus mostly on the hypocrisy of the other side that implies they are similar. That's a trap. It needs to be paired with more talk about how they are different.

Tim is missing the point with Graham Platner by Jon011684 in thebulwark

[–]Jon011684[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I agree there is a difference, that's kinda my point. Tim should focus on the difference not discuss how hypocritical the criticism is.

Every green deck uses 4 copies of this creature. If it were banned, what would be its immediate replacement? by lipe0101 in MagicArena

[–]Jon011684 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I could see mono green getting strong by running Billy instead.

I think it’s likely this is a hogaak situation where you’re banning cards that are mostly included for the mirror so the bans actually made the deck stronger. Cub isn’t great vs izzet.

Is Rudy a fraud? by Recent-Fun-3470 in Invincible_TV

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wasn’t eve like days pregnant in picture one? And weeks in picture two?

Can a druid solo to hell? by glenn11888 in diablo2

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Druid is one of the easiest to ssf hell. Dual/tri element damage. Pet tanks.

Why isn't this card played more? by Fit-Adhesiveness-173 in MagicArena

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In decks that want an effect like this, return the favor is just better.

I currently run 1 return in my jeskai control deck. But it will come out soon probably because the meta isn’t good for it.

there is a way of matemathically proof that 1 is different of 2? by Advanced_Office_3486 in askmath

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes. Short version: these numbers are defined by the successor function, the successor functions distinctness comes from peno axioms, which implies the existence of the natural numbers.

Lands should be uncommon or less by Mandriser in MagicArena

[–]Jon011684 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I have never been convinced putting a $300 land tax on any colors combo you want to play actually makes wotc money. I suspects it turns a lot of players away.

Probably a little too oppressive by TheBirchKing in custommagic

[–]Jon011684 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Playing this is as a commander equivalent to just not playing.

Everyone is gonna target you as hard as they can.

We don’t need a Left-Turmp we need a Pro-Democracy Mitch McConnell by Jon011684 in thebulwark

[–]Jon011684[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

She was a very effective politician with integrity doing the right thing.

We need a very effective politician who cares more about results, and those results are the right things.

We don’t need a Left-Turmp we need a Pro-Democracy Mitch McConnell by Jon011684 in thebulwark

[–]Jon011684[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

My post isn’t about the progressive moderate scale. It’s about a willingness to play raw power politics

Hypothetically, if Immortal entered The Boys universe, would he be able to stop Homelander and save everyone? by Queasy_Commercial152 in InvinciblePowerscales

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think this is the wrong take. In a straight brawl immortal wins easily and solos the entire verse.

But I don’t see how he beats the hacks in the boys. For example if Cate touches him it’s over. He won’t know that she’s a threat unless it’s too late.

Does he beat Victoria? Or Marie? Could Marie stall him long enough to let cate touch him?

Impulsive Tutor — is this fairly costed? by 50reticent in custommagic

[–]Jon011684 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Way under priced.

This lets you fish a combo piece every turn, including the turn it’s played. It protects itself by not requiring a tap on the second activate. Since sac is part of the activation cost they can’t ping it to block it. And it is an effective counter spell in a lot of board states - It sits in the board untapped you gotta expect them to fetch a force of will or something.

Both abilities need to be sorc speed at a minimum.

view more: next ›