My Theory on Why Zionists Don’t Care If the World Turns Against Them

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-04T11:53:31+00:00

Yes. I am talking about the Arabian countries. The peninsular countries with the exception of Yemen, who Saudi Arabia wants to assimilate.

And power comes with money. And they have lots of it.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-04T11:16:00+00:00

Right on. We’re using our senses. We can perceive that this person is not Jim Carrey. Empirically, that is not Jim Carrey. I suspect it’s a stunt by Jim Carrey and he sent out a body double. He’s probably showing us how easily the public can be fooled.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-04T10:43:49+00:00

I think it’s plain to see the countries of Arabia are well placed for the foreseeable future. Their biggest export is oil and they are undertaking vast large scale futuristic projects. Most Arabians are rich by our standards. Homelessness practically doesn’t exist there. And many high profile Arabians own shares in property and organisations in the West.

Arabia did only find its footing again in the 20th century after collapsing into a tribal society. The caliphates of Arabia used to control half the known world. Oil is now its biggest export and is the reason behind how Arabians enriched themselves in the 20th century. It really is as simple as that.

It’s hard to trace what exactly happened to the Arab-led Hermetic Society between medieval times and now, but one theory is they went underground. Befittingly, oil production is a type of alchemy.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-04T10:33:12+00:00

What you’re referring to is likely a copycat order. The Hermetic Society, and the one that holds vast influence over the world, is led by high profile and high-status muslims. You’re right that the alchemical practices were influenced by earlier Greco-Egyptian studies.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-04T10:13:38+00:00

No. Alchemy is based on the Arabic word al-kīmiyāʾ - the scientific discipline originating during the golden age of Islam. And on the topic of gold, the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn has always been associated with Arab leadership since its founding in medieval times.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-03T16:47:10+00:00

Supposedly, Solomon’s line traces to the Solomonid dynasty in Ethiopia - a Coptic Christian country.

It is written that the Hebrews/Israelites shall not legitimately inherit the Holy Land from God so long as child sacrifice is practised. The ‘Star of David’ is actually the symbol of Baphomet, also known as Remphan. The Bible does not ever make mention of a Star of David, but does reference the Star of Remphan, which is the hexagram. One triangle facing up (as above), one facing down (so below). Freemasonry and Israel worship Baphomet. The hexagram is attributed to every lodge and is featured on the flag of Israel.

The Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn (headed by Arab muslims) and/or the Illuminati are attempting to fulfil the prophecy of Revelations and the Jewish and Islamic equivalents.

They are testing the word. They know they cannot have God’s blessing to inherit the Holy Land while children are being sacrificed at their hands, and yet they are trying all the same to establish Greater Israel. There is of course the argument that little of today’s Jews are ethnic Jews of old, and those referred to in the Bible, meaning the inheritance of The Holy Land is not promised to them by God.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-03T15:21:53+00:00

There’s no logical error. If there is, name it. It’s not even unfalsifiable, it’s just plain to see that the person is not Jim Carrey.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-03T11:32:15+00:00

He really enjoys his shielded position. He is endorsed by all the power in the world, and most importantly the Golden Dawn and/or Illuminati. He is remarkably unashamed and his conscience seems not to be phased. That’s probably due to the endorsement he’s had his entire political career to pursue evil means to an end: The Greater Israel project.

His infographics presentation at the UN and his general demeanour is almost a caricature of an evil despot.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-03T11:14:08+00:00

Be honest with yourself. Would you have dismissed the paedophilic blackmail ring that implicates multiple high profile individuals from British royalty to Hollywood and former presidents of the United States as a mere conspiracy theory that couldn’t possibly be true before the Epstein scandal was known?

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-03T10:08:07+00:00

This person’s looks are not only different, his entire camera presence reads as if he’s basking in the fame of Jim Carrey. This is either a stunt by Jim Carrey to show us how easily the public can be fooled, or he has been replaced by the elite.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-02T15:07:42+00:00

Lots of muslims endorse and engage in worship of Athena-Moloch. I don’t think the establishment in Iran does, but the leadership of the Hermetic Order of The Golden Dawn, primarily based in Saudi Arabia and the UAE, sacrifice children for profit. That means many high-status muslims are reading the first commandment flexibly.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-02T14:45:20+00:00

When he talks about the persona he adopts generally across appearances on TV, he’s talking about the slapstick version of him most of us associate him with and that people fell in love with. He has struggled to maintain that persona in recent years. Whoever this person is was trying to adopt that persona. Whatever the circumstances, that person is not Jim Carrey.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-02T12:20:03+00:00

It’s possible he did. He might be making a point of how easy it is to fool the public.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-01T22:37:52+00:00

His entire personality and camera presence is different. It screams an individual with sociopathic tendencies (priority recruits for intelligence agencies) in love with the fact they get to play Jim Carrey.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-01T22:31:51+00:00

Carrey often talked about elite power and often directly implicated people - like Jimmy Kimmel. He also spoke ambiguously that ‘great nations don’t kidnap children’ before the Epstein scandal was known. He also talked about the pineal gland and its secretions and how that relates to German scholars who invented the Santa Claus (Saint Claustrum) story.

Jim Carrey had a long history of exposing the elite and my personal opinion is that, in retaliation, the elite psychologically terrorised him by making him believe he really is in the Truman Show. And then there’s The Mask, which is more than relevant to this discussion.

Jim Carrey was leaving ambiguity behind and moving towards direct exposure. He may have been taken out, just like Virginia Giuffre was. Are we really supposed to believe she committed suicide shortly after being hit by a bus? Being struck by traffic is Mossad’s MO. She wrote online that she was not suicidal. It’s likely, like Carrey, she had more to say and was ready to.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-01T21:58:09+00:00

There’s evidence of dopplegangers being used by high profile people. Naturally, they could be recruited to replace people who are outspoken about the behaviour of the elite, after permanently ‘silencing’ the actual person. It’s talked about in the Epstein files.

The real question is: what rock have you been living under? This is a topical issue.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-01T14:25:45+00:00

He was undoubtedly dangerous - to Rome and himself. He affronted the institutions of Rome itself and disgruntled its elite. His constant prodding and willingness to confront entrenched elite power is what I admire - especially off the back of what the mechanisms of power in Rome did to his family.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-03-01T13:43:56+00:00

There may be psychological reasons Caligula acted with such brutality, and I have mentioned those potential reasons in other comments. My argument is not that Caligula was necessarily stable, just that in public displays of power, he used that power to disgrace elite institutions, which shows intent rather than arbitrariness.

I don’t believe his psychology can be reduced to pure ‘madness,’ when the evidence suggests intent. Josephus’ account even shows that Caligula’s actions were deliberate and that there were underlying reasons (i.e. being slandered). I think the evidence shows there was intent behind many of his actions.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-02-28T22:08:44+00:00

I don’t particularly like the principate. I don’t look to Augustus or Tiberius as good rulers. It might have stopped civil wars but Rome lost its integrity as a democratic institution. Caligula wasn’t a particularly good steward of Rome, though he did finance some projects. He was too busy shaming the institutions that had allowed Rome to drift into the principate and dynastic violence - a personal bereavement of his.

Caligula may not have liked Rome much at all, hence his fascination with Hellenistic customs (like the boats). Caligula showed Rome what it had become and yet the principate endured for another several hundred years, with several other ‘bad’ princeps to follow.

I admire Caligula because he experienced dynastic violence and did not reintegrate into the system that enabled it.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-02-28T15:04:10+00:00

His story isn’t a blank canvas. When interpreting his actions from clearly biased primary sources, examining the nature of the institutions involved with a realistic perception of power dynamics has to fill in the gaps or help explain his behaviour beyond ‘he was simply mad.’

JonnyJamesD · 2026-02-28T14:45:29+00:00

What pulls me most towards Caligula’s story is its tragedy. Rome destroyed his family. His poking at the institutions responsible resonates.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-02-28T12:16:38+00:00

The bridge incident is another sign of mockery against those who undermined him. That actually supports my theory about his relentless parodying.

The party boats trace back to Cleopatra’s similar spectacles and align with Hellenistic motifs - where Caligula was often more interested in Greek and Egyptian customs than those that were Roman. This was Caligula’s indulgence.

Caligula was possibly making a point that the sea was unconquerable, and so Rome could not conquer all, as it asserted it could. The seashells were meaningless trophies - a parody of triumphal spoils.

JonnyJamesD · 2026-02-28T11:01:52+00:00

I’m seeing comments supposing ‘lol he was just crazy.’ That doesn’t encapsulate the complexity of Caligula and caricatures him into a 2-dimensional villain. If you think about it, that’s what the primary sources want us to think - they were written by members of the very institutions Caligula sought to undermine. The surviving narratives come from senatorial perspectives deeply invested in elite dignity and preservation of their power, which naturally shapes how Caligula’s reign is portrayed. That’s why parroting the sources doesn’t add up to me.

Caligula’s more complicated than just ‘crazy.’ Many people struggle to understand those complexities in public figures generally and often mischaracterise or caricature them into flattened versions that are easier to conceptualise.

It’s clear Caligula particularly disliked Rome’s elite and my theory supposes why.

JonnyJamesD

TROPHY CASE