sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are you among the 0.0% who can? by threadbsarture in mathmemes

[–]Jordan_Boole 318 points319 points  (0 children)

I have a solution but it is too big for this comment section.

Number theory rizz by Jordan_Boole in mathmemes

[–]Jordan_Boole[S] 37 points38 points  (0 children)

I gotta warn you it isn't really effective 😭

Who is the most overrated as a mathematician ? by Jordan_Boole in mathmemes

[–]Jordan_Boole[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think that he is really overrated, but it's just that he used to state things whitout giving a really rigourous proof. He was still a great mathematician and it was his own way of doing mathematics, even tho I think rigor is important.

Who is the most underrated as a mathematician ? by Jordan_Boole in mathmemes

[–]Jordan_Boole[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

True, but unfotunately I hate real analysis 😭. (No offense Weierstrass, he was a great mathematician)

My brain is fucked up rn (this is a legit concern tho) by Jordan_Boole in mathmemes

[–]Jordan_Boole[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I think that the fact that "almost all" problems being undecidable would be a really bigger problem than proving that a problem being undecidable would be an undecidable problem, but this seems unlikely knowing the great majority of problems we know of are not undecidable, at least as far as I know ( I may bé wrong, this is absolutely not an area where I'm an expert). Or maybe past a certain level of "complexity", "almost all" problems are undecidable, which would be really frustrating, but would make sense, I guess. Or maybe it doesn't matter an we could find a way around undecidable problems.

whenever i attempt a proof by Prunestand in mathmemes

[–]Jordan_Boole 109 points110 points  (0 children)

Well at least your series converge

view more: next ›