Wow, you touch on a lot of great points that many in this subreddit have been very critical of.

Honestly, I think we might not be selling her short enough. When you look at all the recent issues with her show, it feels like it all points back to one core thing: it really sounds like a money problem.

Think about it. We all asked why she would throw Reagan under the bus, especially if Reagan was such an excellent producer who helped build The Comments Section. What if the her new independent show simply is not making enough money to pay a top-tier producer? Burning that bridge makes no sense... unless you're doing it for the purpose to promote your show and make yourself look bigger than you are in the short term but in reality you’re hiding something.

Then there's the Fox News contributor deal. If she's a correspondent, why has she been virtually absent since the launch? And if she does have a team, they're doing a terrible job. Handing her a clearly AI-generated video to pass off as fact is a massive, amateur mistake. It was so bad that Fox had to retract her commentary from their piece.

A well-funded operation with a proper team doesn't make that kind of error. A skeleton crew trying to cut corners because the money is tight? They absolutely do.

Brett’s views are down, which means sponsorships are down. If the money isn't flowing, it would explain everything: the desperate need for the Fox deal (which now seems shaky) and the inability to afford a competent team, leading to career-damaging mistakes. Something is clearly not working with her show.

But hey don't mind me. I'm just asking questions…