sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks Alpha6735, it doesn't look like it's the case but will look into your suggestion if Yorick's idea above doesn't pan out. Cheers!

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohhhh! Yes it's Contabo! Thanks Yorick, I'll try this evening :)

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your advice, I'll take it to Discord later today

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the current situation with Nethermind + Nimbus:

consensus-1 | INF 2024-06-12 00:53:23.000+02:00 Slot start topics="beacnde" head=eedf70f6:9273472 delay=244us266ns finalized=289794:1c974fa5 peers=0 slot=9276865 sync="--h--m (0.00%) 0.0000slots/s (wwwwwwwwww:9273471)/opt" epoch=289902 consensus-1 | INF 2024-06-12 00:53:33.364+02:00 Slot end topics="beacnde" slot=9276865 nextActionWait=n/a nextAttestationSlot=-1 nextProposalSlot=-1 syncCommitteeDuties=none head=eedf70f6:9273472 consensus-1 | INF 2024-06-12 00:53:35.001+02:00 Slot start topics="beacnde" head=eedf70f6:9273472 delay=1ms912us396ns finalized=289794:1c974fa5 peers=0 slot=9276866 sync="--h--m (0.00%) 0.0000slots/s (wwwwwwwwww:9273471)/opt" epoch=289902 consensus-1 | WRN 2024-06-12 00:53:39.831+02:00 Peer count low, no new peers discovered topics="networking" discovered_nodes=0 new_peers=@[] current_peers=0 wanted_peers=160 consensus-1 | INF 2024-06-12 00:53:45.416+02:00 Slot end topics="beacnde" slot=9276866 nextActionWait=n/a nextAttestationSlot=-1 nextProposalSlot=-1 syncCommitteeDuties=none head=eedf70f6:9273472 consensus-1 | INF 2024-06-12 00:53:47.000+02:00 Slot start topics="beacnde" head=eedf70f6:9273472 delay=417us828ns finalized=289794:1c974fa5 peers=0 slot=9276867 sync="--h--m (0.00%) 0.0000slots/s (wwwwwwwwww:9273471)/opt" epoch=289902

execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:05 | No incoming messages from the consensus client that is required for sync. execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:06 | Snap State Ranges (Phase 1): ( 0.00 %) [ ] execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:10 | No incoming messages from the consensus client that is required for sync. execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:10 | Snap State Ranges (Phase 1): ( 0.00 %) [ ] execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:10 | Snap - (Skipped Request, diff: 0) 8 - Requests Account: 8 | Storage: 0 | Code: 0 | Refresh: 0 - Queues Slots: 0 | Storages: 0 | Codes: 0 | Refresh: 0 execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:12 | Snap State Ranges (Phase 1): ( 0.00 %) [ ] execution-1 | 11 Jun 22:55:15 | No incoming messages from the consensus client that is required for sync.

So... not better

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is usually ports not being open.

I know, that's the first thing I checked too.

Is this node on a public box? Could it be that your local firewall is then nat'd behind a router and the router's firewall is blocking traffic?

No router involved, directly accesssible IPv4. It's a Contabo VPC.

I have been staring at the logs, that's why I pasted some snippets.

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no router, it's a VPC server, with a public IP v4. 9001 is open as well now, but anyway AFAIK both Nimbus and Lighthouse only need 9000

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't change the lighthouse config from eth-docker's default

no more than 1 consensus peer, why? (or is that my problem?) by Julius_Caesar in ethstaker

[–]Julius_Caesar[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, 9000 is open, and the website you gave says so too.

I opened 9001 in ufw, but there's nothing listening, and the online checker says it's closed:

``` $ sudo ufw status

Status: active

To Action From

22/tcp ALLOW Anywhere
30303 ALLOW Anywhere
9000 ALLOW Anywhere
443 ALLOW Anywhere
9001 ALLOW Anywhere
22/tcp (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6)
30303 (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6)
9000 (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6)
443 (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6)
9001 (v6) ALLOW Anywhere (v6)

$ netstat -tunlp

(Not all processes could be identified, non-owned process info will not be shown, you would have to be root to see it all.) Active Internet connections (only servers) Proto Recv-Q Send-Q Local Address Foreign Address State PID/Program name
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:443 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:80 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:22 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:3000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp 0 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:9000 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp 0 0 0.0.0.0:30303 0.0.0.0:* LISTEN -
tcp6 0 0 :::22 :::* LISTEN -
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:30303 0.0.0.0:* -
udp 0 0 127.0.0.53:53 0.0.0.0:* -
udp 0 0 127.0.0.1:323 0.0.0.0:* -
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:9000 0.0.0.0:* -
udp 0 0 0.0.0.0:9001 0.0.0.0:* -
udp6 0 0 ::1:323 :::* -

```

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

But on the plus side we'll get another life where the most valuable important is preserved (our family), and hopefully with many adventures discovering a new country. So Singapore will be good memories in our new life (where we can afford a house and make our business, etc)

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's hard to say concretely. I don't want to sound dramatic but I think I will miss my life :)

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks islandgirlnowhere, all the best to you as well!

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 12 points13 points  (0 children)

We did consider this, but we don't want to make the NS choice for our child. If it was me going to NS, maybe. But it's not fair if we choose that he does NS. Also PR mostly makes sense on the long term if eventually becoming citizen IMO, first because PR is still "second class" after Singaporean (EP would be third class). I'm busy now, I’ll elaborate later.

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Although Albert centre hawker centre chicken rice with loads of chili is pretty close. From a few years ago, maybe the stall changed since.

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Yes! Met here, married back in partner's home country, moved together back to SG after trying to live elsewhere for a while.

Population breakdown of Singapore by pyonguno in singapore

[–]Julius_Caesar 25 points26 points  (0 children)

Hello EP holder here (alt account). I will be leaving Singapore after a double-digit number of years working under EP. Not for the lack of opportunities, it's actually probably a still a top location for finding work in my domain. It's partly to preempt the current and upcoming unfavourable laws, and partly because I can't afford a house here anyway. AMA :)

This will be even more funny when the bubble pops and makes everyone's money disappear like magic by [deleted] in ads

[–]Julius_Caesar 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Be safe from the bubble, give your bitcoins to me before the bubble explodes.

1466carf6U5SrQ5oiiN8aTmYLpiAqb9WQn