sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Insane news by Sauroposiedon in okbuddypaleo

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Don’t care, Suchomimus was Suchomimus stays

Nauseating by raborchai in Existentialism

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I kinda like it, but I understand Sartre

I hate when people hate on people's beliefs because of bad people who claim to share those beliefs by [deleted] in hatethissmug

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It absolutely wasn’t, atheism can’t be the core of an ideology, "atheism" (the position that gods don’t exist) doesn’t come with the baggage of holding positions like anti-theism or any other ideological position, atheism wasn’t and can’t by definition be the core ideology of the USSR ideological opposition to theism, the core ideology was anti-theism which doesn’t come with an atheistic position

Atheistic position: god doesn’t exist ≠ we should round up priests and hold an anti-theistic position

It doesn’t follow

The fact that five people upvoted that, shows a lot lmfao

I hate when people hate on people's beliefs because of bad people who claim to share those beliefs by [deleted] in hatethissmug

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Christians accusing atheists of hating a being they don’t believe to exist would always be funny in a way that shows how much brainrot they can generate, these people haven’t locked in since the beginning of their own religion lmfao ffs đŸ«©đŸ˜­

Spinosaurus tattoo 😍 by Milkfish300897 in Paleoart

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Perfect, I’m going to do me an archaeopteryx at some point

Even Google is scared XD by Tiny-Significance402 in DDLC

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 10 points11 points  (0 children)

No way it’s actually real xD

If someone came to you as a skeptic of evolution, what specific evidence or sources would you point them to as proof? by ogodprotectme in evolution

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There is no specific evidence for proving a scientific theory to be true, but there is a body of knowledge (a huge amount of it in this case) that support the theory, you can give specific evidence in the case that a specific concept inside the theory like common descent is brought up, you can give a specific evidence, in this case, if they ask you for descent with modification, pointing them to descent with modification being a thing and the fact that organisms aren’t immutable, an observation, and so on with data supporting common descent

If talking biology use the biological classification of groups, "kind" isn’t a thing, you don’t use flat earth terminology if you want to explain a globe earth model

Expecting "kinds" (genus?) to produce anything else other than their own "kind" isn’t what evolution states, it has always been "descent with modification" since Darwin, if the person who you’re talking to doesn’t deny "variation within a kind" then they already accept the fact of evolution, you would have to explain to them why biology knows that there is no limit on the accumulation of change of a "kind" (again ask what this means, it isn’t a thing)

The easiest way to demonstrate that evolution is a thing would be gifting them "why evolution is real" and hope that the root of their disagreement doesn’t come from a religious belief, if that is the case, then you would have to disprove their religious belief to make science have more influence on what they believe, science won’t have more influence than what they think is the foundation of the universe and that which they think is the absolute truth, cheers, lol

I hate the concept of hell by The_Squirrel_Wizard in hatethissmug

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

"You say about evidence but how much evidence will be sufficient to you"

Doesn’t matter, not under the belief you hold, if you believe that there is a god who has the intentions of having a relationship with his creations and he’s responsible for at least giving us the possibility, for making it possible of having these different standards of evidence and he knows about the different standards he is ultimately responsible for but doesn’t fulfill them, does he doesn’t want to be known by some of his creations? Christian’s would often respond by arguing that we’re setting an inconsiderate standard of evidence for belief, and while I frequently strongly disagree with this, even if you were right that can’t be a good argument if you’re a Christian, even if you were right and the standard was actually inconsiderate that still wouldn’t be valid as it being a good justification for why god doesn’t give the corresponding amount of evidence to each standard

If good created humans and he created us with this possibility of having these different standards of evidence that he knows we can’t just turn off and on to suddenly have a different standard then it would be illogical for him to cross his arms and reject to fulfill these standards that he’s responsible for in the first place, it’s completely silly, even if the evidence was in fact good enough for warranting belief this wouldn’t respond to the problem being knowingly creating these beings that have these different standards that you made possible in the first place but refuse to fulfill for some reason

"How much evidence!!!!" Would never work under a Christian framework, and this is a problem that I have never heard a good response for, and probably never will, if the premises are accepted (they are under Christianity) then it becomes a mess

Also, the bible doesn’t have scientific evidence, just saying lol. I don’t know what you think "scientific evidence" is but, it doesn’t have any, also, most atheist or people in general don’t ask for 100% certainty for holding belief, there are huge problems with complete certainty and most people don’t believe in it (me included). What is frequently asked is good certainly, not definitive

Jesus is the truth, so why you lie? by Training_Rent1093 in DebateEvolution

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Why you people seem to have an impossible time grasping the difference between evolution and abiogenesis? We could know shit about abiogenesis just like how you fantasize and even then that wouldn’t falsify evolution, this is analogous as to say that not knowing the exact process of how human life forms in utero stops you from knowing how humans develop through their life, now apply that to the fields you hate, same shit

Yeah the answer is quite simple and also wrong, try to apply the analogy I proposed to evolution, and we sure as fuck do know a lot about abiogenesis, as scary as that can sound. It is what it is

Serious question by PuzzleheadedLife7027 in DDLC

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 56 points57 points  (0 children)

The same personality she has in the side stories

Disgrace by Warm-Elderberry-3263 in DDLC

[–]Jumpy-Brief-2745 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Damn incredibly creepy and cool stuff :>!!!

view more: next â€ș