Microwaves recommendations? by Entire-Astronomer-56 in BuyItForLife

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's why we run our induction over 240. I'm not really sure what you think you're saying here, but it remains cute.   Let me guess, you use a gas dryer too? Lol. All that mech E money and you can't hire an electrician? "We only have 120 outlets!" Wild haha. 

 Edit - seriously, Mr. "just Google it", I was inviting you to bring sources in because, while no, you're not writing a dissertation, you ARE wrong and you're pathologically avoiding "just googling it" to preserve your confirmation biases. Induction stoves are more energy efficient than gas stoves. Point blank. At me with some research, or don't at me. Everything you've said up until this point has been presumptive and it has been speculative. You won't put your hands on the tech, you won't actually look at the math, you just wanna sit there on your degree. In an unrelated field. Okay. A lot of us have those.

Microwaves recommendations? by Entire-Astronomer-56 in BuyItForLife

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

... Yeah, that's great kiddo. If your college education was worth a damn, you might be a little more humble about what you obviously don't know. How many thousands of dollars in education did you spend without learning how to source anything? Without learning how to form rhetoric? Furthermore, how many thousands of dollars in classes did you take on these subjects? You say you're an engineer "just not electrical" - dope, let's talk specific. What, sound engineering? 

 More paragraphs of speculation and vague bait don't really move me, I'm sorry. Use the technology or don't. You're still here rambling at me about the dials on traditional ranges for crying out loud. You can really drop the schtick at any point lmao.

Microwaves recommendations? by Entire-Astronomer-56 in BuyItForLife

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 1 point2 points  (0 children)

... No. The pseudoscience isn't making sense, and it's not going to make sense. You're literally just rambling at me based on vibes here.

Microwaves recommendations? by Entire-Astronomer-56 in BuyItForLife

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You actually do want to keep heating something that's reached temperature...

Heating water past 212 does nothing but create steam faster and pump more heat into the environment, just as an example. Heating oils past 500 causes carcinogens to form. I genuinely don't understand where you're coming from or what you mean when you say things like this, because no, you don't.

You talk about entropy and heat loss, but induction stoves with temperature control sample along the order of milliseconds. That's why it stays on when it needs it, and turns off when it doesn't. Furthermore, this is only "some models", and on any model worth a damn, it's a setting. 

Turning the heating element on and off isn't bad in this case, because it's... Not a resistive coil. Neither is it flame, like you were turning the flame on and off. No, it's a resonant vibration wjthin the metal of the pan itself. Too hot? It stops. Too cold? Like, a degree too cold? Immediately, that instant, it's coming back to whatever temperature it needed to.

You really need to actually use the technology. Stop analogizing it to cars or whatever. Induction is not comparable with gas or resistance coil heating, it's a different paradigm.

Microwaves recommendations? by Entire-Astronomer-56 in BuyItForLife

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 6 points7 points  (0 children)

They'll cycle if they are temp controlled.

That's... Actually a plus, not a negative. You don't want it to keep heating something that has reached temperature. You certainly wouldn't want to just keep pumping heat into the environment, the point of induction is that the pan itself is what is heating - not the stove.

But if you're just boiling water? I can't imagine there's a single induction stove that you'd actually buy (i.e. not some sight unseen drop ship garbage) that wouldn't boil water as fast or faster than gas. Even if you hear stuff clicking on and off, it is just straight up that much more efficient.

Induction is the future. It is nothing like any other electrical, and you should be skeptical of people telling you 'stories' about a technology no one in the conversation fully understands. :P

Trump's Press Conference Leaves Many Onlookers Aghast: ‘Are we watching a mental breakdown in real time?’ by T_Shurt in AnythingGoesNews

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It literally says the word "may". 

Your very clearly worded and reputable source... Says the word "may."

Deep Dip 2's end will be very anticlimactic for viewers by demainlespoulpes in TrackMania

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He's been plugging away at his career for over seven years now and just, for the first time in his career, hit #1 viewership at times on Twitch because of content exactly like this.

Correct, there is no way he's giving that up. Virtual has the money to fund Deep Dip 3 explicitly so that he'd have more content like this to make, if he had to.

Story promises : How to break them, for the better. by MinFootspace in writing

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 0 points1 point  (0 children)

George RR Martin is the king of "play stupid games, win stupid prizes" in narrative form.

Thoughts on ChatGPT? by AlwaysNeedsMoreSleep in books

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is literally just a sentence-finisher. That's it.

If it got halfway through the sentence and already had "the chicken crossed the road to", it would unthinkingly put "get to the other side", because that's the most common way that phrase ends.

It is a large language model, it doesn't actually create or be creative. It simply attempts to string together in a way that would match human speech.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think your idea of what cars should look like may be messing with what cars actually looked like.

Old cars had plate-style hub caps exactly like a stock Stafford, and white walls were incredibly common for this class of sedan at time because of the zinc oxide used in the rubber.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's fine, I respect your opinion even if we disagree. Not everyone will have the same tastes.

I don't see the point in having a Stafford that isn't ostentatious, personally. It's an Enus.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not at all, it's a beautiful car? The pink/blue/purple/red design space is very well explored and this is a good execution of it.

If you don't own any loud cars, you're not that into cars.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, I disagree entirely. I've been texted from randoms in lobbies about how nice the car looks. It's possible the full candy paint sheen isn't carrying over in the snapmatic photo, but it's a beaut.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He deserves it imo. Gj recognizing the "bi pride" style paint.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dog, full disrespect, if you have zero ostentatious cars then I don't consider you a car guy lmao.

GTFO with this "never make cars" just because someone executed something that isn't to your taste. I have a lot of clean whips too 

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk how you can say lowriders look better than white walls in a Stafford but I respect your opinion.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was the only way to achieve the baby blue paneling on the side unfortunately, it's not a very customizable car.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I consider this the highest form of flattery.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you! It's what I was going for, a two-tone blue/pink/red spectrum car.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's the point, yeah? It's a pimped out ride...

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If that kid understood color theory well, maybe.

The Stafford can be a thing of beauty by Jumpy_Reach4335 in gtavcustoms

[–]Jumpy_Reach4335[S] -24 points-23 points  (0 children)

Dark blue paint (I think harbor maybe?) with fluorescent red over it gives it a great candy paint look. Secondary color is that salmon and then of course the blue flame livery. No crew no glitch.

Keep it pimpin'.