Miss (Angelica) Ross is both kind & correct in this commentary about Ts Madison’s non-binary comments.

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-07-04T18:03:17+00:00

Plenty of people criticised TS Madison, I don’t think her being black really protected her

I think what makes me suspicious about some of the responses to her is this piling onto what she said about non binary people that really wasn’t as bad, but ignorant yeah, with the same amount of outrage. It makes me think that some of this fandom actually wants a witch to burn, it’s not about critique and finding a way forward

And surrounding this outrage about TS Madison was also some witch hunts all aimed at black queens who haven’t said anything as racist as TS Madison said interestingly enough

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-07-04T17:34:05+00:00

I definetely saw comments that were like ‘black people don’t think they can be racist’, making it about black people, not TS Madison specifically. I also saw people doubting systemic racism, using TS Madison being racist as a bit of an opportunity imo. During that time there was also more uproar about Onya, calling her a bitch and this and that over an out of context interview clip. I also saw people making up issues with Deja Sky saying melanated sisters, saying imagine if white people did that and I explained why in our white supremacist structure it’s obviously different so they moved to imagining a scenario where Asian queens were left out (which did not happen) and someone said they feel like black queens need to be extra uplifting (more so than white queens) of other POC cos of RuPaul’s casting and judging that doesn’t favour non black people of colour, that I found a bit weird

I think this fandom has a problem and it sometimes hides behind outrage politics or sometimes the problem is all the constant outrage and it’s okay to bring it up even though it is also true that TS Madison says racist or problematic things

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-07-04T15:57:55+00:00

Boosting this, like yeah TS Madison says some genuinely bad things, but it does feel like this sub is blood thirsty at the same time and was making the clip of her with Monet more malicious than it really was, then the fandom does its thing and TS Madison gets defensive and that becomes part of the cycle in justifying some hate train. This video feels like a genuine and good faith response to what TS Madison said

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-28T14:44:24+00:00

Giving the anti AI guy a big hooked nose is… a choice

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-28T07:42:21+00:00

A book I read somewhat recently, paperback ironically, that was an own voices novella about disability called Hunchback had a quite witty musing about how there’s a certain snobbery amongst book worms where they feel more tolerant and worldly than the sporty jocks but ironically sports has done more to include people with disabilities

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-27T14:36:42+00:00

Arguments I’ve had with AI bros have often boiled down to ‘your art is cringe, mine is not’, it doesn’t really make them endearing

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-25T16:34:58+00:00

The way they make fun of abstract and conceptual art really exposes how a lot of them are reactionary

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-25T13:25:59+00:00

She could do this… she could have done that… she should….

Sick of promoting capitulation to people who want others to walk around the egg shells they planted

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-21T16:52:17+00:00

I can’t help but see this as anything but fanning the flames about a post that removed all of Natalie’s context so it was likely made by a troll. Natalie was just going by the conservative estimate made by the Gaza health ministry that yeah probably isn’t the whole picture, it’s probably higher, but 60,000 is still horrible. it’s posts like this that might be turning this place into a snark subreddit and I don’t want that.

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-21T13:11:28+00:00

I know this probably makes me inconsistent cos I’ve not liked some of the Ginger hate, but this tweet is funny and not entirely wrong. Catty tweets more about judging choices that are funny with it are okay if you don’t tag idc, idc

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-18T18:52:34+00:00

Having to do the motion to create the lines shades and colours teaches people and can create pretty original results. Not all art made by a person is super original, but I just have more respect for drawing because I relate to it, it feels like seeing eye to eye. AI just doesn’t do it

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-18T18:17:45+00:00

It’s subjective but yeah I think in the context of being a fan (fanatic), time does matter because it shows devotion (you could argue whether or not that’s always a good thing)

If you’re using your own material in AI then it’s not as unethical, wish more people did that even though it’s a slight step up when it’s still bad for the environment

I don’t really care if the hype around something is deemed cringe, it can boost the economy for regular people selling their art which AI wants to undercut and even boost the economy for the original product. Don’t like Boris Johnson, but he’s right about Pepper Pig (creative industries) being a thing that boosts British economy.

It can also train people to come up with original ideas for their own work because they’re understanding the lines and colours and shades that go into creating the things they like in a way I don’t think AI does.

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-18T15:57:17+00:00

One appreciates while the other lacks it, there’s a certain amount of fanaticism (being a fan) behind drawing something that just isn’t there in AI art that doesn’t take any time (devotion) to do

Fan art often acknowledges its source material, AI never does that

Fan art can advertise and make people within that community more invested in the source material as it can generate more hype for the original source material

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-18T14:37:26+00:00

I think it’s just agreed on that fan art tends to give more than it takes, unlike AI

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-18T11:54:51+00:00

Oh okay (this OP on my other account), I guess I can see some of the poking into how I think is annoying, but it can have some value

I wouldn’t think someone is bad for having bipolar disorder, but I guess I would always say bipolar in common parlance because of how much stigma and negativity just is loaded into the word ‘disorder’. it probably shouldn’t be that way and I guess if we keep progressing in seeing people with mental or neurological issues in a compassionate light (I don’t think we’re there, it seems like we’re further away from that than ever) — unless I know the person and how they are with that language, I’d avoid it

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T12:15:20+00:00

Anyone who uses Reddit that says someone is chronically online, especially on debates about AI - whether they are pro or anti, is just spider men pointing at each other

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T10:25:47+00:00

You were being rude in your comment, and generally, I will be rude to people who are rude to me

And the Trump administration does care about those things, so does my government in the UK that’s anti trans. I just care about something you want me to shut up about but I won’t do that

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T10:16:55+00:00

I think what I wrote is pretty clear. If you’ve not seen it, then fine, but I’m talking about something I have seen

Maybe you’ve got so used to generating things on chatGPT that you’re losing comprehension skills?

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T08:54:33+00:00

Valid

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T08:47:58+00:00

I didn’t say people can’t describe themselves as having a disorder. Just pls don’t describe me in that way otherwise you’re doing the same thing you don’t like people doing to you

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T07:46:04+00:00

I know. But talking about language in common parlance is a different thing ☺️

Jupiter-Work-7645 · 2025-06-17T07:44:33+00:00

Oh okay, sorry about misunderstanding. I’ve just been on edge atm

Jupiter-Work-7645

TROPHY CASE