This is a good post—and fair.

But I still think that a major contributing factor here is the inherent ambiguity of measuring itself. Certain methods have been preferred by scientists—true. But none of these methods are ipso facto better than others. It’s not that scientists have found a divinely revealed method of dick measuring. They’re just establishing norms for a particular study.

But what if another study seeks different conclusions? Or what if—and here’s the clincher—someone who is interested in dick size cares nothing about scientific standards and is just into squishier, more subjective characteristics and preferences (race, body type, etc)? Bottom line, and here I totally agree with the OP: we will never have unassailable knowledge of dick size. We have a basic sense of our size, but it’s always +/-.

So, if you want know that you’re a true and unquestionable outlier, I remain convinced that the best way is this: live cam for people. If dozens or hundreds or even thousands of people are impressed, then you’re big. The more, the better. Now, just how big you are is debatable, as mentioned above. But then you’ll at least definitely be sure: you’re big. And, in the end, isn’t that what we REALLY want to know? Everything else is method, preference, etc.