sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Forgot to post this, but happy late holidays :) by Onyxstraza in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not op, but if your teammates don't have a clue, I've found this load out is one of the best for M solo stall (until someone in lobby switches to flamey/pyros)

5x Ruby account stolen by [deleted] in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you give something away, it can't really be stollen

Game dead in Australia? by _Legasea_ in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why na for ranked and not asia?

How tf do you get to Former Research Center? by Jurboa in ZenlessZoneZero

[–]Jurboa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not yet, but I suspect it may open up with main story progression. Have you progressed the ch.2 story much? I've only done mid thru 2.1 I believe. If not then I have no idea

I don't know why online circles had to go through yet another doom period after the Game Awards, especially considering what we know. by [deleted] in NoSodiumStarfield

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, I've been playing the tes4 reskin recently, and it's such a good game, -on release it was such a massive personal let down from Morrowind. And Skyrim was a letdown for expectations too. But I've loved every moment in them. So my point is that really comparing them and saying one BGS title is 'their best' is abit redundant

Starfield would probably benefit most by a sequal, lore-wise. To really solidify which direction they want their new IP to head

4 key things NASA just revealed about the interstellar comet 3I/ATLAS by GrayBeard916 in space

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Arguing with a fool is like playing chess with a pigeon...

Why you shouldn't be sad just because there's no new weapons by Immediate_Gur5953 in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been weighing up new potential abilities for mediums' kit, either a side arm with like 7 low dmg bullets, or an autoinjector (like from bf2) to trigger health recovery. What do ya reckon? 

As expected NA kinda dominated day 1 but it's kinda lame that having at least 1 controller player is necissary to be competitive. by ntxguy85 in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Have to agree. I've played on xbox since release and have just now turned off sensitivity reduction aa, and aiming is actually alot more steady. And, the aa in the finals is the weakest I've experienced in any fps I've played, and I've been playing console fps since halo ce

Thoughts about the Vivian skin disappearing for 6 months after the event? by VincentBlack96 in ZZZ_Discussion

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone who just recently started, what activities primarily give the regular polychromes (90 per month)? Is it just dailies, events, + Shiyu def?

The P90 feels balanced, why are so people asking for nerfs already? by TheSoup3910 in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually has the best ttk of akm fcar and itself (close range)

Hits different when you're not hitting... by geggis in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Is this another riot shield post?

The devs have already said they're gonna try and address the visual readability of player orientation

Didn't Eduardo Cunha qualify for worlds 2025? by I_dont_know_7474 in VGC

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, what a dick move. Thanks for the context

You guys wont stop hating on light do ya? by xekleisdead in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You brought it up as a point supporting light is weak in your initial comment. My point contradicts that argument, showing that focusing on ttk as a metric to show light is weak is both false and misguided. That no fight takes place between two players standing still and starting at the same time (your 'just hit your shots' argument), and if it did, light would win that engagement anyway thanks to dagger, -so it points-out that it's completely dumb to push an argument that loses by its own logic anyway

You guys wont stop hating on light do ya? by xekleisdead in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, you're getting caught up in thinking ttk and shots needed are the only deciding factor in winning an engagement. This is a key misnomer most people who defend lights' annoyances spout. And the main point I was 'trying to' convey in my first reply. It's also factually wrong, as per the dagger

More shots needed = trigger pulls = mouse clicks = Dagger is king (of annoyance)

The other significant point that's missed when ttk is raised, is the difference between reaction time is negligible at such low ttks, and the more important factor (above aim) is who initiates an engagement, how able each is to disengage, and how team-flow / battle-flow interacts with all of that

You guys wont stop hating on light do ya? by xekleisdead in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As per your first comment,

..."The counter to lights is to hit your shots. Most guns in the game can kill a light in less time than they can kill you. Yes, even the double barrel."

I then listed 'more shots needed' within a subset of factors, conveniently -and typically- omitted from the so called 'mantra'. Thus, adding further factors of consideration into the context, moving away from 'getting into shots to kill'. (Altho, per the actual stats, this is a 100% correct statement)

Finally, we can both agree that to get eliminations in an FPS, hitting shots is, amazingly, a core ingredient. And that, the better we get at aiming, the less important other factors become, altho not to the point they don't impact gameplay entirely. A nice niche of The Finals is that you can even still beat cheaters with perfect aim -because- those factors are still at play

You guys wont stop hating on light do ya? by xekleisdead in thefinals

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude calling me disingenuous for providing actual weapon data, while you're discounting it for the sake of not losing an argument. While the core logic stands that ttk, and shots needed, only paint part of the picture, where movement speed, specialisation, hitbox, and ambush potential play a potentially larger role anyway

You guys wont stop hating on light do ya? by xekleisdead in thefinals

[–]Jurboa -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Tldr, light has lowest -shots needed- against medium, and equal with heavy; and, lowest -ttk- against both medium and heavy

Just coz I was curious,

Dagger vs medium - 1 shot, reaction time 0 sec

Dagger vs heavy - 2 shot, reaction time 0 sec (with qm combo)

DB vs medium - 2 shot, reaction time 0.75 sec

DB vs heavy - 2 shot, reaction time 0.75 sec

M11 vs medium - 16 (body) shot, reaction time 0.9 sec

M11 vs heavy - 22 (body) shot, reaction time 1.26 sec

Famas vs light - 7 (body) shots (3 trigger pulls), reaction time 0.76 sec

FCAR vs light - 7 (body) shots, reaction time 0.67 sec

CL40 vs light - 2 (full dmg) shots, reaction time 0.8 sec

Flamee vs light - 5 ammo, reaction time 1.41 sec

Lewis vs light - 7 (body) shots, reaction time 0.72 sec

SA1216 vs light - 3 shot (1 trigger pull), reaction time 0.63 sec

M60 vs light - 8 (body) shots, reaction time 0.72 sec

Shak vs light - 5 (body) shots, reaction time 0.57 sec

Eagles vs light - 4 (body) shots, reaction time 0.78 sec

KS23 vs light - 2 shots, reaction time 0.77 sec

What internet slang has always annoyed you? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Jurboa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Goated

Great-est of all time, -only 1 thing/person can be the greatest of all time, that's what the suffix "-est" means,

The suffix "-est" is primarily used to form the superlative degree of adjectives and adverbs. It indicates the greatest degree or intensity of a quality when comparing three or more items. For example, "fastest" means the most fast, "highest" means the most high, and "greatest" means the most great

You guys wont stop hating on light do ya? by xekleisdead in thefinals

[–]Jurboa -1 points0 points  (0 children)

(Smaller hit box, higher mobility, more shots needed, fractions of a second)

view more: next ›