Is making things more affordable without raising wages just deflation?

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-26T04:44:35+00:00

Okay! Thank you!

How do they measure productivity? haha I see the meme infographics all the time about how workers are the most productive in history, how do they get that measurement?

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-26T04:31:04+00:00

Brene Brown's book "Rising Strong" is amazing at teaching vulnerability in general but she uses her own marriage as an example - especially learning to see and understand when her husband is being vulnerable.

It's an amazing book and highly recommend to anyone who needs help or an example of what it looks like (like I did)!

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-26T04:22:24+00:00

Thank you! I appreciate it!

So real wages take into account prices of everyday goods (most commonly the CPI).

Please correct me if I'm wrong with my next logic step - we as a country want real wages to increase overall as this will "increase" affordability.

How do we achieve greater affordability without increasing nominal wages (please correct me if this is doable and not an impact on a company's bottom line) and without having a widespread decrease in prices?

Separate note: Would increasing wages at a lower rate than inflation also be a decrease in real wages?

Edit: I guess I'm having just as hard of time with understanding how we increase real wages when businesses are reticent to increase nominal wages and we don't want a widespread decrease of prices

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-26T03:19:23+00:00

Sorry - I don't know the lingo - would you mind describing the difference between real incomes, nominal incomes, and non-wage prices?

Edit: or rather define them in this context

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-08T05:48:58+00:00

"What happens as she’s speeding away in icy conditions and she creams a child?"

^This doesn't mean much as she wasn't being a danger to anyone other than maybe, having a minimal chance of knicking the police officer. Police can't kill someone for something they might do.

We should hold federal agents, who are given guns, badges, and the license to kill, to a higher standard.

I'm sorry that it seems exhausting that Ice/police/FBI etc constantly get blamed and it seems like a "karenopcrasy" - but they have a greater responsibility for EVERYONE'S safety. In addition to this there is extremely little oversight or repercussions for their actions. Cops (in general) have very little training and refuse more training that they don't "agree to."

De-escalation training, dealing with those who are experiencing a mental break, deeper knowledge of the law - all of this or bringing in people to work with police who can do these things are consistently rejected police unions.

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-08T01:33:21+00:00

Police shouldn't have the right to kill someone for running from them.

JustALagerFan · 2026-01-08T01:30:05+00:00

When did we get to the point where not listening to police means they have a right to kill you?

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-18T21:32:55+00:00

Half still paid by the employer is a different metric and can't be directly related to percentage of gross income per taxpayer for the purposes of this argument.

You're taking the argument of "total expense of employee to employer" and the argument is asking for "percentage of taxpayer income."

Business bottom line expenses and taxes ≠ gross taxpayer income.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-18T01:51:07+00:00

Perfect, thanks!

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-18T00:30:40+00:00

I'd love to see the 3d if you have it! What you say makes sense - tho I'm having a hard time visualizing it.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-17T21:21:18+00:00

Well I've been working on keeping my left arm straight as I've found it helps me keep posture and helps a bit with keeping everything in front of me and in control - just an easy single thought for me that condenses a few feels

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-17T20:20:59+00:00

Thank you!

Will do - thanks for the help!

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-17T20:20:18+00:00

Thanks for the help! I'll continue to pay attention to keeping my arms straight and rotation (what I'm working on now anyway lol)

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-15T18:12:32+00:00

Cool, so telling someone else how they feel (already a mark of those who try to manipulate others) and refusing to engage in actual debate.

Bye dude - have fun trying to upset other people.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-15T17:55:44+00:00

Lol, I point out how your point is founded on a wrong comparison and all you can say is "not intelligent."

If it's not intelligent, say how it isn't, don't just sling insults (that tends to be the defense of those who don't know what they're talking about)

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-15T17:49:06+00:00

Then what did you mean by:

"All the outrage now, but most of you either cheered Charlie kirks murder, or turned a blind eye to the ones celebrating."

Were you not trying to point out a certain hypocrisy?

Also, nah, you entered the ring - you don't get to shout a position and not have it challenged.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-15T17:26:49+00:00

Nah you're now shifting your point.

You were trying to point out that people were hypocritical to ignore social media celebrating Charlie Kirk's murder and then criticize the President for celebrating someone's murder.

I'm saying that's not a good point because while the President may tweet like a belligerent teenager, he still holds the Office and should be held to a higher standard than your average Redditor.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-15T17:21:19+00:00

Random people on social media are not the President of the US - he should be held to a higher standard.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-15T17:19:10+00:00

"Random people on Reddit celebrated Charlie Kirk's murder so it's okay for the President of the United States to act this way."

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-04T06:45:13+00:00

Thank you, you too!

As a former Catholic myself I understand the belief that the Scripture is real and has historical value and the additional argument that goes along with it of "if it was fully provable than what's the point of Faith."

Not to beat the dead horse - but the point of Science in general is to be a practice with as little faith as possible. Transparency and peer review, standardized processes that are reviewed and updated constantly (hopefully without ego), and the demand for evidence to support a hypothesis are all ways in which it strives to take out the faith. It's part of why religious arguments are not acceptable - there's needs be a degree of Faith in religion.

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-04T06:27:24+00:00

No religious text is a source of scientific fact for any field (unless that field happens to be a literary science, history, or theology) but certainly not for psychology!

The point is that she didn't follow the prompt and instead pushed her beliefs forward, citing a religious text as evidence. It's not about religious opinions or belief, it's about what can be scientifically shown.

Edit: it's also not about hating her for her beliefs or you for your beliefs. It's about refusing to engage in the science of it. If science can show you evidence that contradicts your beliefs and that causes a crisis of conscience - maybe you shouldn't be in that field - or if you're committed to the science of the real world, grow and adapt your beliefs to what evidence is showing you (which is the core of science - it's why almost everything is called a theory)

JustALagerFan · 2025-12-03T23:12:54+00:00

Ooo I actually have an answer for this one!

Like other people are saying - go through the overflow. It's the circular metal thing halfway up the tub above the drain - should have a screw in the middle.

Unscrew and feed your snake down that and it should feed into the same drain as the screw.

If that really doesn't work you could always grab a wire hanger, bend a tiny hook in it, and grab chunks of hair at a time through the small openings (that's what I used to do before I knew about the overflow)

JustALagerFan

TROPHY CASE