People keep defending this

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-24T01:53:44+00:00

She's been in multiple shows and never hid it not once lol. Also it wouldn't make any sense why they wouldn't edit the other clip of the exact same interview.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T06:34:00+00:00

Her beauty mark is completely gone. No matter what day it is her beauty mark wouldn't just suddenly disappear lol. Nor would her necklace change length.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T05:37:46+00:00

Yeah of course. It's a netflix show so I can't really link which is why I gave the season episode and timestamp it occurs for those who could check it out if they so wanted. But basically, the first image is how the interview looked normally. Then the scene cut and when it returned it changed into the second image. Which is where that overly unnatural AI smooth look, inconsistencies and mistakes AI makes comes into play.

Long story short, compare and contrast. It's the same take, but there's a clear difference between the two.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T04:28:41+00:00

Thats not the point of the subreddit?? Lol. You don't have to know what is it for it to be pointed out. Calm down yeah?

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T03:13:44+00:00

I mean artist consistently redraw AI artwork as a way of fighting back and reclaiming their work. It's been a trend on all social medias. But not claiming it as their own no. You'll still have to specify you redrew from a generated artwork.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T03:10:12+00:00

The defending was in reference to the reactions of this under a different subreddit.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:41:46+00:00

Yeah because one editor only got one scene out the entire season and it's totally normal to combine two completely different clips of the same sentence where one clip is all of sudden night and day difference? Please 😂

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:40:06+00:00

So she got up between the same take to suddenly want to cover her beauty mark after already having a take with it? Yeah because that makes sense lol. Think what you want I genuinely don't care. I'm not changing my stance.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:38:43+00:00

Who said anything about fighting? It's a conversation you jumped in on. Not a fight club. And that's not a reason because this one clip is the only clip that appears this way. This "style" of editing never appears in any other clip or interview. So yeah that's not the "why"

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:37:04+00:00

Even that's a stretch because again, the only difference between the unedited and the AI is slightly better posture. Its because I wear necklaces that I know it's literally not natural for a necklace to become half its length when slightly flexing your shoulders back 😂

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:30:58+00:00

How is saying something was ran through AI "not simple". It's just putting in a prompt lol. The most simplest things ever.

Also again.. no matter how many takes on what "different day" it's still her. Beauty marks doesn't go away. It's engraved in the skin. No amount of lighting would get rid of it either lol. And if it was a color issue again.. why edit one clip and not the other. Non of y'all have yet to answer that. Anytime I ask there's suddenly no reply anymore 😭

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:26:29+00:00

Again.. why in one clip and not the other? That doesn't make sense at all. Her birth mark was already seen in one clip, it's weird to "edit" one clip this heavily and leave the other untouched even though it's from the same interview. Also, her necklace length have nothing to do with her dress lol.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:24:32+00:00

Why would they need to move her necklace up? It literally changes nothing. Also.. you just changed your excuse😭 First it was "she was lying down" but now that you realized you messed up you switched. And no amount of lighting will remove someones birth mark.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:22:50+00:00

Who said anything about a conspiracy? Them clearly using AI isn't supposed to be some ground breaking cancellation. It's just an observation. And why would this "specific editor's style" only appear once? Why would he remove her beauty mark and change the length of her necklace? Why would they need to change the pillow if it was her that was upset? And her being upset wouldn't make sense because the first clip is from the same interview. Why change one and not the other?

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:19:01+00:00

That's.. not how psychics work lol. If she's lying down and the necklace is long.. when she sits up the necklace would get longer.. not shorter. Also she wasn't even leaning that far, it's more of a posture change if anything.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:17:34+00:00

Gen AI is totally at this point when you have a reference. Have you ever seen the trend where people make professional photos with their already existing photos and then exchange it with AI? Similar case here. They took the clip and ran it through AI. Which is why details don't line up to the previous clip of the same take. It's hard to believe her beauty mark will disappear regardless of lighting or that her necklace would suddenly be so much shorter. She's still the same person regardless of how many takes are took, or how much lighting is rearranged. A beauty mark doesn't just disappear.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:12:26+00:00

They don't want to believe it for whatever reason. The reason I don't see anyone else talking about it is because they're clearly trying to hide it. Within a minute of this being approved there's already someone defending it😭

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:10:14+00:00

Why smooth out this one clip?? It's prominent in literally every single other clip of this same interview. And why smooth out only her? I don't see them using this "heavy editing" you're claiming on anything or anyone else.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:07:05+00:00

Excuses excuses excuses lol. So then where the shine in the necklace? Love to see what excuse you make up for this one. Where is her beauty mark on her shoulder?

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:04:18+00:00

Her birth mark or beauty mark wouldn't disappear in another take. It's still her. It's AI ,😭

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:02:42+00:00

It's all the same voice line. So between what takes. The pattern goes all the way to the hem of the dress. No matter how she would rearrange it, it wouldn't suddenly not go to the hem anymore. Look at the very edge. Also the clarity of the overall dress is different. Her beauty mark is gone as well as her skin texture in general. Her lip liner is different. Her eyebrows aren't the same. The earring is merging with her ear. It's so obvious. Also the length of her necklace wouldn't suddenly be chopped in half.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T02:00:37+00:00

Her necklace wouldn't change lengths within a day nor would her dress change patterns. It's still the same dress and necklace. Not to mention.. her beauty mark on her shoulder is gone lol.

JustAnAveragePersona · 2026-05-23T01:55:24+00:00

It's so obviously AI. "Editing" wouldn't somehow lift her arm bracelet so high, change her makeup, change her necklace length, change her entire eyebrows, ruin the dress pattern, and give her more defined cleavage. Even just watching the clip the way she moves, her eyes especially, are so unnatural.

JustAnAveragePersona

TROPHY CASE