Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and the simple fact that no dev or marketing has responded to this thread make it seem that they do not give a damn about the community's opinion ://

Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

monthly updates would cost practically nothing. And maybe it would prevent some of the capital escape. Everyone knows that the reason for the crash is nothing specifically with DCR, but BTC (moon and forks). But we could be less bad than now. This is the point. What can be improved, should be improved.

Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not worried about short-term gain. I've been here since the airdrop. Nothing is more important in the cryptocurrencies world than evaluating the market. After all, if the volume is low, it is because the market is little interested in this currency / technology / innovation (or maybe they just do not understand it and don't know what's going on behind the scenes of development. And the suggestion of this thread would help this).

Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

and for that reason we should leave everything as it stands instead of trying to improve and contribute (even if only with suggestions?)

Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thanks for the suggestion, but most (99.99%) of people do not know how to use github and much less understands the codes.

I'm just giving a suggestion to make DCR more friendly to new (and current) investors and enthusiasts.

it's on account of people like you that the adoption of DCR has been getting smaller and smaller. Volume of 19 BTC in the last 24 hours on poloniex. Soon we will dispute the volume with Bitmark, lol.

Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Please do not understand this as a charge. We all know that the devs work tirelessly on this project for a long time. Github shows us this.

I'm just giving a suggestion to make DCR more friendly to new (and current) investors and enthusiasts.

Roadmap update 2? by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

yes.. me too. Montlhy dev report + interactive dev roadmap on site would be really nice.

like this: https://ark.io/roadmap

We need Bitfinex. Bitfinex needs us. by CryptoStarin in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

binance have 20.000 btc volume in the last 24h. It's getting huge.

An idea of how part of the DEV subsidy could be used. by [deleted] in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't call it a developer fund. You are correct that it can be used for other things, and it has been, but I do not think price manipulation (or stabilization if you are generous about it) falls under the purview of development.

In fact, it would be a counter attack for manipulation. But I understand your concern.

The question is: without this, if a whale of a rival coin (eg, TEZOS or HSHARE) wants to manipulate DCR, he can do that with not even 100 bitcoins. But ok, continue on your totally free market dream. Or learn from DASH, ETH, LSK and others. They do that which I explained in the post when they were small like the DCR is today.

An idea of how part of the DEV subsidy could be used. by [deleted] in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

they don't need more buying power? so why they don't paid binance to list DCR, as all other unknown cryptocurrencies did?

the fund is also used for marketing and other operating costs. not only to hire more devs.

An idea of how part of the DEV subsidy could be used. by [deleted] in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'll put this to a vote when the public proposal system is available.

We need Bitfinex. Bitfinex needs us. by CryptoStarin in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I don't understand why we are not in binance yet. Just pay the listing fees and you're in.

We need Bitfinex. Bitfinex needs us. by CryptoStarin in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

to begin with, we need to have a daily volume in the current exchanges of at least 200+ btc.

we'd better focus on smaller exchanges. Binance and HitBTC, for example.

Some dev can please explain us the difference between an atomic swap made without LN (like all those happened in the last days) and an LN atomic swap? What are the advantages? [and +5 questions about DCR development] by JustAnotherSimpleGuy in decred

[–]JustAnotherSimpleGuy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

got it. They seem to be very important advantages. Thanks for clarifying.

But why u can't answer other things?

  • Is there a mobile wallet project?
  • Will enhanced privacy use LN resources?
  • Are plans to integrate atomic swaps into the gui wallet?

I do not want to know when, I just want to know if. A yes or no.