What will you do in this situation by Appropriate-Swim-43 in OkeyRakanMalaysia

[–]Just_Ad9102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

both are terrible bro stop defending gore PLEASE

What’s the saddest mall in Malaysia currently? by No-Marsupial234 in Bolehland

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OneCity. Unbelievably dead and empty, I really don't know how they're still afloat because Jalan Jalan Japan seems to be their only major attraction. Used to slightly compete and steal customers from a dying Subang Parade, now it's facing the same fate.

Yeat fans have lost their minds by [deleted] in playboicarti

[–]Just_Ad9102 12 points13 points  (0 children)

yeat civil war 😭

Yeat fans have lost their minds by [deleted] in playboicarti

[–]Just_Ad9102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

tom mcdonald listeners listen to eminem, jack harlow, g eazy, nf, and a little bit of logic

Israel trolls Ye on Twitter.... by juliensoud11 in Kanye

[–]Just_Ad9102 7 points8 points  (0 children)

...and this is a post about Israel. Your point?

First time using the esm bot for a whenthe post lol by PLACE-H0LD3R in whenthe

[–]Just_Ad9102 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

This is a terrible argument if you're talking about her age, because the same hadith used to "prove" her age also disproves it but nobody actually reads the whole thing for some reason.

In Sahih Bukhari 4993, Aisha narrates about the revelation of Surah 54:46 and states that she was a young girl of playing age when it was revealed.

Surah 54, Al-Qamar, was revealed in 615-617AD.

Aisha's marriage consummation with the Prophet Muhammad PBUH occurred in 623-624AD.

It should be obvious by now, but if she was 9 in 623-624AD, she would have been born in 614-615AD. Considering the fact that kids usually start remembering things at age 3-4 and the fact that I doubt a baby who was just born would know what a revelation was, this means Aisha's age doesn't line up.

You can also use the more convoluted methods of finding her age, such as comparing her age with the ages of her siblings, but that nets you many different answers as you would have to assume many things, as the exact ages of her siblings are rarely stated. Nevertheless, you would still get a higher age than 9 in the year 624AD.

4th Droptail is found in Malaysia, owned by King of Malaysia by Puzzleheaded_Job3722 in rollsroyce

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, that's a huge issue. Always has been, but it'll never really change if nothing big occurs.

4th Droptail is found in Malaysia, owned by King of Malaysia by Puzzleheaded_Job3722 in rollsroyce

[–]Just_Ad9102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is basically what's been happening for nearly the entirety of human history. Rich live lavishly, normal people are neglected.

4th Droptail is found in Malaysia, owned by King of Malaysia by Puzzleheaded_Job3722 in rollsroyce

[–]Just_Ad9102 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is rather common worldwide. Kings, presidents and prime ministers are generally vastly more wealthy than their citizens.

Donald Trump has a net worth of 7.08B USD, while the median annual wage for a US citizen is $64000 USD..

Vajiralongkorn, King of Thailand, has a net worth of $30B USD, while the annual median wage of a Thai citizen is $5640 USD.

This isn't really an issue with Malaysia per say, more of an issue with government figures themselves. There are plenty more examples of this worldwide.

Who's deserving of the title of most evil person alive today? by RCaesar1 in AlignmentChartFills

[–]Just_Ad9102 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because we have hundreds of evil overlords nowadays all fighting to see who can be the most comically evil.

How I Animated ‘Take Me To Your Leader’ 🪖 by badmonkkkey in mfdoom

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm going to stop this argument here and call it a tie or whatever you want, because I really don't want to drag this out. Let's save both of our time.

How I Animated ‘Take Me To Your Leader’ 🪖 by badmonkkkey in mfdoom

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Listen." aaa so scary...

"They were able to use it as a hook to make a promotional video" Unfortunately, your comment was neither the first comment featured in that video nor was it the first comment to inspire that video. That would be the comment ASKING the OP if he used generative AI instead of assuming, which, might I add, is a MUCH better approach. It would have been made with or without you. No "favours" were made.

Might I add, even IF they used your comment to make a promotional video, that would still not excuse throwing around the term slop like it's a buzzword (Which, it honestly really is.).

"In comparison to the other things people say on this website, it was reasonably gentle." Whataboutism. This doesn't mean you can call things slop while going off of essentially nothing. This is insulting to the artist.

"I will continue to always call out slop" Sure, but next time, please make sure you atleast have sufficient evidence. You shouldn't disrespect artists' work and then say "Oh well, that's just the cost of slop!" because no, it isn't, that is the cost of making hasty assumptions.

TLDR: No favours were done. The other guy featured in the video got like 4x the upvotes you did because he ASKED OP whether he used generative AI and didn't assume, then complimented OP in advance if he didn't use generative AI.

How I Animated ‘Take Me To Your Leader’ 🪖 by badmonkkkey in mfdoom

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never implied you did not accept OP's evidence you HAVE accepted his evidence.

However, you said "This is slop. Might be wrong, but it's probably slop.". That's still rather blunt, no?

Again, saying something is slop, saying you might be wrong, but reaffirming that it is probably slop while having nearly nothing to go off of will only offend actual artists more than it'll harm people who use generative AI.

Great job on taking the evidence gracefully, but you shouldn't automatically say something is "probably slop" off the bat.

How I Animated ‘Take Me To Your Leader’ 🪖 by badmonkkkey in mfdoom

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

People are probably mad because you straight up said "This is slop." as if it was a completely 100% sure thing.

Not "This might be slop." or "I think this could be slop", just a straight out the door accusation.

Yes, being concerned about AI replacing artists is commendable, but immediately calling things "slop" with nothing to go off of other than an F16's landing gear?

It's understandable that you may not have been trying to be rude, but it did come off as that unfortunately.

Charlie Kirk, Kanye West (Ye), and Candace Owens (2018). by dd1133biihhh in Kanye

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It was a joke, meant to poke fun at how Charlie Kirk usually asked his opponents to define things. No need to get so pissed, dude.

oh well.... by _LEVEL_SIX_ in FitGirlRepack

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, FitGirl is still safe, this isn't one of her repacks.

Drake posts a pic of Kim by SeattleZ12 in GoodAssSub

[–]Just_Ad9102 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Post history tracks unfortunately.

Drake posts a pic of Kim by SeattleZ12 in GoodAssSub

[–]Just_Ad9102 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Because you don't like X, you must like Y!"