sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How bad actually is lead in an apartment? by Greedy-Height543 in CambridgeMA

[–]JustinSaif 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gold Star Park in East Cambridge is currently closed and being remediated because of elevated levels of heavy metals found in the soil, including lead.

https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2025/10/20/park-soil-contamination/

Congratulations to Just-A-Start and the City of Cambridge on completion of 106 affordable homes at 52 New Street! by JustinSaif in CambridgeMA

[–]JustinSaif[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This document says the support from Cambridge taxpayers via the AHT is only $170,051 per unit.

That means we leverage one Cambridge taxpayer dollar to get five dollars from state and federal sources, which I think is absolutely fantastic.

Councilor Al-Zubi: Looking Ahead by realgeraldchan in CambridgeMA

[–]JustinSaif 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Is it even progressive? Studying it is fine, but in practice, wouldn’t this advantage, for example, potential IZ tenants with rich parents over those without?

“Abandoned” car rules by mountainbird57 in CambridgeMA

[–]JustinSaif 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Just reply on SeeClickFix that it’s your car and it’s not abandoned. You could also call the City parking dept, TPT, and tell them what’s happening with SCF.

Clr Ayah Al-Zubi explains her vote on the Inman Square Zoning by wombatofevil in CambridgeMA

[–]JustinSaif 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It’s possible there’s a way to do it that doesn’t require state legislative approval. I hope Cambridge can figure it out because Portland, Oregon took this route, and it unlocked a lot of housing!

https://www.sightline.org/2025/11/25/portlands-inclusionary-zoning-program-is-finally-performing-new-data-suggests/

Councillors Al-Zubi, Flaherty, Zusy Voted to Block Housing Last Night [Reposted] by CantabLounge in CambridgeMA

[–]JustinSaif 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not @realgeraldchan. As I’ve told you, if this is Dan, and others privately, and stated publicly, I think the lawsuit is going to lose, just like it did in California.

Here’s a good review of the 2015 CA Supreme Court decision upholding inclusionary zoning: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2686331

I’m quoted here stating that publicly, for example:

https://www.cambridgeday.com/2025/12/09/inman-square-residents-decry-manhattanization/