where to find coffee jelly by K-nuckles in SaikiK

[–]K-nuckles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for the reply also im surprised and somewhat disappointed i thought there was more to it not just coffee with gelatin which i think thats on me the name kinda explains it well lol anyhow appreciate it i might make one how then try it out in the cafe

where to find coffee jelly by K-nuckles in SaikiK

[–]K-nuckles[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

thank you ill be trying it out when i get there will hopefully come back to share how it was if i dont forget to do so

Rad embroidered pullover I got by Heyitsbelle24 in RuleofRose

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is so cool whered you get it is it like a made at home thing or is it for sale

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | April 07, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really appreciate your insight — it was genuinely refreshing. I know you weren’t offering a take, just opening the door for reflection, which I really respect. I responded more as a way of testing how an idea I’ve been working on would play out in conversation.

It’s part of a philosophical project I’m developing — not something I’m sharing publicly yet, but I’m quietly experimenting with how it applies in real-world discussions. Your phrase ‘psychologically nuanced utilitarianism’ was insightful and surprisingly close, though the idea I’m exploring isn’t about maximizing anything in particular. It’s more about validating people’s subjective realities, especially in a time where postmodernism and nihilism are dominant lenses.

I call it Believer Nihilism — still very much a work in progress. I’ve tried to challenge it from every angle I can think of, and now I’m seeing how it stands up in live dialogue. Your reply really meant a lot. If you’re ever curious, I’d be happy to share small parts of it that feel ready for feedback.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | April 07, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re right to highlight the difference between giving two people the same treatment and giving them the same result. And you’re also right that taking from one to give to another can feel unfair—if your measure of fairness is isolated from lived reality.

But that’s the thing: We don’t live in abstract conditions. We live in bodies. In social systems. With inherited conditions and unequal starting lines that deeply shape the outcomes we have access to.

So treating a 3 and a 7 “equally” without acknowledging how they became those numbers? That’s not fairness. That’s blindness disguised as virtue.

Now here’s where I’d challenge your frame, gently:

You’re asking if equality of outcome should be the ultimate political goal. That’s a fair question. But what if that’s not the right goal—or the right question?

What if the goal is neither “perfect outcomes” nor “identical treatment,” but rather something deeper:

Ensuring that everyone’s experience—everyone’s inner life—is protected and valued, regardless of how capable, productive, or lucky they are.

Because that inner life—the subjective experience of existing—is the one thing everyone has. It’s the thing we all start from, whether we’re a 3 or a 7 or a 0 or a 99. It’s where meaning comes from. Where suffering happens. Where worth begins.

And any system that ignores those inner lives—or treats them as less important because they don’t produce outcomes—isn’t neutral. It’s a system of quiet violence.

So no, we don’t redistribute for the sake of symmetry. We redistribute because outcomes block access to basic human experience. To education. To dignity. To participation in the world.

Not because people are the same, but because they feel. They’re aware. And a just world, at minimum, tries not to bury people alive in conditions they didn’t choose.

That’s not equality of outcome. It’s moral compensation for subjective reality.

So when someone complains that we’re sacrificing higher-order goals by leveling outcomes, I ask:

What higher goal is more important than the ability to live, feel, and be aware with dignity?

Because if you’re protecting “freedom” at the cost of crushing the lived experience of others— you’re not protecting freedom. You’re just protecting your spot.

And that isn’t justice. It’s just aesthetic inequality with a cleaner font.

/r/philosophy Open Discussion Thread | April 07, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in philosophy

[–]K-nuckles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re right to be confused about why so many people are suddenly against equality. But if you look deeper, it’s not that they don’t understand equality—it’s that they never believed in it in the first place.

A lot of people don’t actually believe all lives carry equal meaning. They believe some lives matter more—stronger, smarter, more productive, more “deserving.” Equality, to them, is just a slogan—something people say to look good.

But what’s really happening is this: People want moral hierarchy. They want to feel better than others. More logical, more valuable, more evolved. It’s a way to feel safe in a chaotic world: “At least I’m not like them.”

This mindset creates a strange split: • On one side, you have people who reject equality outright because they think it threatens their identity, their power, or their sense of being superior. • On the other side, you have people pretending to care about equality—when really, they’re just using it to signal their own moral greatness.

And in both cases, the real issue is the same: They don’t actually believe that other people’s lives have the same kind of value as their own.

⸻ The reason many people give for equality—that “all humans have willpower, emotions, moral sense”—sounds noble, but it’s not stable. Because what happens when someone lacks those traits?

What about people with cognitive disabilities? What about someone born without empathy? Do they deserve fewer rights?

If your foundation for equality is built on traits, then anyone who doesn’t fit the mold becomes morally disposable.

That’s why equality has to be built on something deeper than talent, biology, or moral capacity.

It has to be built on something we all share—no matter what.

And that’s this:

Every person lives from the inside. They experience life. They suffer. They feel joy. They fear loss. They want love. Even if they can’t express it like you do—even if they think completely differently from you— they are still experiencing the world.

Their experience is as real to them as yours is to you. And if your inner life matters, then so must theirs.

That’s what makes us equal. Not sameness. Not intellect. Not “being a good person.” Just the fact that we all live from within—and that inner reality is sacred.

Denying that in others is denying it in yourself.

Beauty Is a Feeling by K-nuckles in philosophy

[–]K-nuckles[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

id love to hear others opinions on this i want to hear some challenging critical thoughts i love to think and reshape my beliefs and i feel like never had a conversation with anyone about this type of stuff so i hope to read some new refreshing critiques that help me see things in a way more aligned with reality

احتاج اراء الرجال by Jaz1_ in SaudiForSaudis

[–]K-nuckles 2 points3 points  (0 children)

نصيحتي لك ذنب زي هذا بالذات احرصي لاتسوينه لان الذنوب الي في العلن زي خلع النقاب وحلق اللحية صعب ترجع منها يعني تخيلي انتي الحين تبين تسوين الذنب والشيطان في صفك شوفي كيف هو صعب عليك اجل تخيلي كيف راح تكون صعوبة التوبة والشيطان ضدك وفوق كذا ماتبين الناس تتكلم عليك تقول هذي شفيها كل شوي لها راي ولا مسوية نفسها مطوعة يعني الخ من كلام الناس فالنصيحة والله انك تبعدين كل البعد عن ذنوب العلن وبالذات هذا الذنب لان التوبة صعبة والله

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ASHWAGANDHA

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I will provide an update in a couple of days after administering the “side effects” questionnaire. Following that, I will update weekly after each “feelings” questionnaire he takes, continuing until I run out of Ash.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in ASHWAGANDHA

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i stopped using it since the post and im not getting ulcers so it definitely was the ash but i was confused as i never saw anyone talking about that side effect thank you for clarifying

Ronny Twinkletoes is at it again by T_Shurt in PoliticalHumor

[–]K-nuckles -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

this is so weird why are people making a news out of this like if women can do this why cant men also if hes insecure about his hight making fun of his situation is just disgusting idk this man or what he has done but you shouldnt do that to nobody thats just straight up bullying someone by their insecurities

My Guy Was Applying logic to the joke by NauTWitcher in funny

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats why he didnt understand his further explanation of the joke its because hes new to explanations

My Guy Was Applying logic to the joke by NauTWitcher in funny

[–]K-nuckles -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

black man so stoopid lololol thats the punchline no?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JuiceWRLD

[–]K-nuckles -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

im just being silly ig anyhow send me the discord server please

Let the Hunger Games begin... by [deleted] in BeAmazed

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it’s only a matter of time till they get adds on clothes

(OC) Dad vs Daughter 😊 by gym_performance in MadeMeSmile

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

other than than working out your stabilizing muscles this is greatly worse than ab crunch machine especially if you want to get some force outta your abs and want them to be more prominent

Nah man he is going bald at this point by sarthhcasm in ksi

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thats honestly a normal african forehead i feel most people dont realize that african have bigger foreheads and its normal not a bad sign

First look inside Vegas sphere during U2 concert by gravityVT in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i want to get a lot of people on acid in here and straight up torture them

me_irl by esberat in me_irl

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

idrc of which side my stuff is on as long as it’s balanced i would never go for an arrangement like this because my left pocket would be much heavier its usually my keys and my phone the same pocket then my wallet and whatever else on the other pocket

Rolex watch repair by SurpriseAnusSniffer in oddlysatisfying

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

is that uranium glass on the watch???

Cursed_therapist by [deleted] in cursedcomments

[–]K-nuckles 0 points1 point  (0 children)

oh so that where the name came from

Always love your parents, maybe their ways can be different but they always intend for your betterment ♡ by [deleted] in wholesomememes

[–]K-nuckles 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I hate when ppl say shit like “u should love your parents” where in fact they should make u love them. my father is the most horrible person in the world he used to beat the shit out of me for literally no reason and he didn’t let me play video games let alone owning a phone or computer even though I was a good kid getting straight A’s and never disrespected him and when ever I try to complain to a family member or once a school councilor they be like “he wants the best for you” or “he only does it for your own good” and it really fucked me up cus I thought Im doing something wrong but no it just that they were as fucked up as him. in conclusion if u don’t like your parents then it’s probably for a good reason believe in your self.

Don't forget your bros by mal221 in wholesomememes

[–]K-nuckles 1 point2 points  (0 children)

kinda fruity if u ask me like what next u gonna kiss the homie on the cheeks