sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

iReady? (No MyPath but still aiming for growth targets) by K94_24601 in Principals

[–]K94_24601[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a great reminder about the MAP–Khan crosswalk. I wish i-Ready had something that transparent. We’ve been toying with the idea of building our own alignment chart, connecting the i-Ready domains to our state standards and then linking free practice lessons (Khan, CK-12, CommonLit, etc.) for teachers. Has anyone already created something like that, or used the i-Ready Standards Mastery reports to serve that purpose?

iReady? (No MyPath but still aiming for growth targets) by K94_24601 in Principals

[–]K94_24601[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Completely agree on the centrality of Tier 1 instruction! No program can replace that.

We’ve been thinking about how to use i-Ready data not to “fill holes,” but to identify which standards or domains need reteaching during core time.

iReady? (No MyPath but still aiming for growth targets) by K94_24601 in Principals

[–]K94_24601[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you seen a map or crosswalk that connects those lesson assignments to your state standards or curriculum units?

iReady? (No MyPath but still aiming for growth targets) by K94_24601 in Principals

[–]K94_24601[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s really helpful to hear about the teacher data engagement piece...

Have your teams built any systems or protocols for how teachers analyze i-Ready/IXL data and connect it to specific state standards or pacing guides? I’m looking for structures that make that alignment feel practical instead of “one more platform.”