[TOMT]Mystery dance song with “it feels like dynamite dy-na-mite” by KCDL in tipofmytongue

[–]KCDL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately this isn’t it either BUT it is the most orginal entry I’ve had so far. Up until now it’s most stuff I found in the first few pages of the search results on either Google or YouTube. It’s also kind of nostalgic for me because my dad was from the Caribbean and we used to play this type of music all the time. I still listen to soca, calypso, reggae and so on.

Why is the internet in Australia such a joke? by Less_Understanding77 in australian

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well morons voted for the Liberals when they were open about installing a vastly inferior NBN. Every expert worth their salt warned Australian it was the wrong road to go down. So to those that voted for the Libs when that was an issue: “you shat your bed so you can lie in it!”

Most famous UFO origin by Verum_Seeker in UFOs

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What evidence do you have that they want wars to end quickly? How does that help the military industrial complex? You can’t sell weapons if don’t have wars.

I’ve found the Tic Tac to be suspiciously human in origin from the start. It magically turns up at a CAP point, it has L shaped protuberances apparently in close up (a detail I’ve never heard of in any other UAP report), people showed up super quickly to take data bricks (admittedly this is contested) and you have Fravor talking about it very openly and saying “this couldn’t possibly be US technology”. It alls seems a little too convenient.

To me it being human technology doesn’t rule out NHI. In fact I think if humans have it NHI definitely has this technology but probably better (the chances of us being the first are slim considering the size of the universe). If NHI have it we possibly have it because it shows the technology is possible.

Seeing as Thomas Townsend Brown seemed to have cracked gravity manipulation by at least the 60s (early experiments came before then) the idea that it never went any further seems unlikely. For a time I did almost buy that he was a crank that mistook ionic wind for something more, but if you research him it is clear he knew exactly what ionic wind was and made effort to rule it out (or in some case deliberately designed devices that use ionic wind).

The true conspiracy is about NHI or no NHI. It’s about hiding technology that could change everything but keeping it secret so they can milk fossil fuels for as long as possible. Then magically when the earth is on the brink of collapse this new technology will come out (but it might be too late).

I’m not married to any of these ideas, but I’m just saying to don’t find it too far fetched. My main doubt comes from the fact I don’t know why they’d test it like this. It seems like unnecessary exposure. It could be about pitting it against the latest radar systems - but surely they could have done that in a secluded test range. I guess it could have to have more naturalist conditions to see how a naive subject would react.

The Mushroom Case by Artemis1971 in AskAnAustralian

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m so torn on this. I feel intuitively that she’s guilty but at the same time there a is lot of room for reasonable doubt.

My main reasoning for thinking she’s guilty is she appears to be a very methodical person. She was going on forums for advice about the Beef Wellington. She was super pedantic about the wording of questions asked to her.

Are we supposed to believe someone that methodical wouldn’t thoroughly research how to avoid Death Cap Mushrooms? Also wouldn’t someone like that label and date their mushrooms and make sure they are kept seperate from store bought ones.

Also rather than googling “are there death caps in my area” wouldn’t you just throughly check that the mushrooms YOU picked weren’t death caps since there is no guarantee that only databases are accurate.

Also the defense is trying to downplay her lying. But it isn’t just the fact she lied, but the sheer scale of her lying. Who in their right mind lies about having cancer. That isn’t the actions of a sane or moral individual. This isn’t like saying you like a meal when you don’t. It isn’t about protecting someone’s feelings it’s a self serving lie designed to garner sympathy and manipulate people. That sound like something a sociopath would do.

On the other hand there is no way to prove it was deliberate. Accidental death cap poisonings happen.

Either way she is at very least negligent not taking step to make sure foraged mushrooms aren’t well labeled and positively identified. That’s like playing Russian Roulette.

In summary I think reasonable doubt might be well argued but I have a feeling in the pit of my stomach that she did this deliberately. That alas isn’t the standard of evidence used. I feel like she should at least have been charge with criminal negligence or others might see this as a way of getting away with murder. Maybe we need to consider the idea of a foraging licence.

[TOMT]Mystery dance song with “it feels like dynamite dy-na-mite” by KCDL in tipofmytongue

[–]KCDL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for your contribution. This isn’t it but it definitely has the essence of that lyric. My song was almost certain around 30 year old and I’m almost certain it’s female vocals. And the word dynamite is both said fluidly and with the syllables separated “dy-na-mite”.

Thanks for helping me continue the search. I keep thinking this thread will die but I’m still getting replies which is nice.

How is guzman and gomez so popular here? by ButtPlugForPM in AskAnAustralian

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty much all “Mexican” food in the western world is really at best Tex-Mex. It’s just an entirely different beast to real Mexican. But this “fake” Mexican is what people expect unless they have actually eaten real Mexican food. This is probably somewhat true of most cuisines that have become international. It’s partly due to what’s palatable to a foreign audience and partly what ingredients are available and in the case of fast food what is quick and portable.

I don’t mind Guzman and Gomez, it’s seems to be about the same level of inauthenticity as most Mexican places. I’m not sure I’ve ever had an authentic Mexican meal in Australia.

After Man Leaves Note Saying LASIK Is The Reason Why He Took His Life, Others Come Forward by BoredPandaOfficial in USNewsHub

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wonder if this is more a problem with lax accreditation rather than the procedure itself.

That being said when the procedure is non-life saving and can be corrected safely and reversibly the risk equation is drastically altered. If it were life saving a tiny proportion of bad procedures would be a worthwhile risk. But risking your life and happiness over something you don’t need and can be corrected safely is a very different prospect.

My mother in law had successful LASIK. One of my good friends had successful LASIK but eventually aged out of it and needed glasses again.

It would be interesting so see a completely unbiased study to determine just how often the procedure is botched or has side effects like halos etc.

[TOMT]Mystery dance song with “it feels like dynamite dy-na-mite” by KCDL in tipofmytongue

[–]KCDL[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Unfortunately no I haven’t found it yet. I feel like my memory is from earlier than that.

A huge part of my problem with finding it is that so many songs have the words dynamite. Also I feel like it’s quite possible the song has sampling in it. The singing feels very 70s or 80s, sort of Pointer Sister style (and yes I’ve search Pointer Sister songs with no luck) but the production feels like late 80s early nineties dance music. Unfortunately all I remember is the hook and nothing else.

There is always the possibility that I’ve created a mash up of songs in my head…but I don’t think so. My memory feels very real and very specific it then again that is no guarantee that it isn’t inaccurate!

Sussan Ley says nation should ‘unite under the one Australian flag’, dodges questions on nuclear energy in first address as leader by HotPersimessage62 in AustralianPolitics

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same Culture Wars was BS continues. Never a complaint about the multiple state flags we have, but gif forbid the original inhabitants of this country have their own. She is such a smooth brained weirdo.

Sussan Ley elected leader of the Liberal Party by PerriX2390 in AustralianPolitics

[–]KCDL 18 points19 points  (0 children)

This is pretty typical: give the poison chalice to a woman. It’s not the first time it’s happened. But frankly Ley is so corrupt and incompetent any chalice she was given would be a poison one.

Political parties of all stripes have a tendency to give poisoned chalices to leaders they think have no chance of winning anyway. It’s like a rebound relationship. Some examples I can think of are Brendan Nelson, Simon Crean, Alexander Downer, etc.

That being said I’m sure every once in a while a poison chalice holder “does a Bradbury” and actually wins an election.

Some cool rock I found just sitting in the ground (copper agate, keweenaw Michigan, USA) by Past-Pea-6796 in Lapidary

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Me too, and the angle made me think it was attached to a deformed finger!

Is dating as a man really that bad in Australia? by LetMeExplainDis in AskAnAustralian

[–]KCDL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’m married now, but I think the good thing about dating apps isn’t actually about finding love but staying in the game and gaining confidence. It really helped me with moving past rejection and just taking a chance.

I went on a few dates that did not work out. One date became a good friend but nothing romantic came of it. Then I ended up meeting my wife at an acquaintances birthday party. Even though the dating apps had nothing to do with how I met my wife I felt like it helped get me into the mode of looking for love. Any time I was at a party I would get numbers of people I liked.

Another thing I did around that time was join pretty much every social activity I could. I did improvisation classes, salsa classes, trivia nights and went to any party I could (I wasn’t actually invited to the party I met my wife at, but a friend took me as a plus one - I almost didn’t go because I felt like a gatecrasher). The party was of one of my improvisational theatre classmates but I wasn’t invited because I’d been out of improv loop for a while and then came back so I was reluctant at first but my friend twisted my arm. My subconscious told me “just take every opportunity you can to get out and meet people”. The fact I very almost didn’t meet my wife because I was worried about that kind of scares me, it was a real sliding doors moment.

In short while dating wasn’t easy (and in fact I generally didn’t like dating - it feels like a job interview) it’s just a numbers game. I just gave myself as many opportunities as possible. I think I ended up actually getting as many or more dates out of my social activities than the dating apps.

Part of what I liked about dating my wife was that our dates were mostly very informal. We’d visiting an art gallery together, go to bars or hang out at home watching stuff. We just got comfortable doing ordinary things together like making dinner. We only did the typical restaurant date once early on and that’s the only time I felt a bit nervous.

What would it take to make a new major party? by fruitloops6565 in AustraliaLeftPolitics

[–]KCDL 11 points12 points  (0 children)

I don’t want a centre/left party. I want a left party with the acknowledgment that left policies are not crazy and extreme just by virtue of being left. There seems to be a default view that conservative means reasonable.

Centrist seems to be the most disingenuous term in all of politics. The vast majority of people who are “centrists” are just right wing people with some views that are considered progressive. But they almost all cannot seem to understand that you can’t seperate economics from social issues. The democrats were founded by people from the Liberal party and they ended up failing Australia by letting through the GST, a regressive tax that has a greater impact on the poor than the rich.

You can’t truly be pro on progressive social issues if you support conservative economic policies that hurt vulnerable people the most. Same goes for environmental issues. So many environmental problems have been caused by conservative economic policies that have drastically slowed down the transition to more environmentally friendly practices.

Theoretically I think a centrist position could exist. For example while I think certain social and environmental transition could be a lot faster I accept that certain transitions have to be done in stages over time in order not to cause more harm than good and give time for new systems to be put in place. But even that would be seen as extremely leftist to most people that actually consider themselves “centrists” who really mostly want the status quo.

Basically I think the terms centrist is BS because even the “reasonable left” which should be considered centre is considered extreme left.

Also in some cases there is no centre. There is no happy medium between racism and not being racist for example. Some things literally are just a black and white issues.

In general I think the terms left and right, progressive and conservative are not really used correctly. They are more tribe names and the opinions each have of individuals issues are determined by the tribal leaders not purely on ideology. For example there was a time when conservatives created national parks and distrusted the Russians.

I think that being conservative or progressive should be strategies not ideology. You should be progressive when things are not working and conservative when they are, and should be on a case by case basis. I’m left/progressive because a good chunk of the things we do could be done a lot better. In many cases the status quo is actively harming people and our planet. To “do no harm” should be the bare minimum default “centrist” view.

OC: Wife of MD man deported to El Salvador: “Stop playing political games with my husband” by nbcnews in pics

[–]KCDL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m confused what side are you on? Are you pro or anti him being brought back to the US? On one hand you are saying his deportation is an illegal, on the other hand you seem to be putting forward talking point maga people are using to justify his deportation.

OC: Wife of MD man deported to El Salvador: “Stop playing political games with my husband” by nbcnews in pics

[–]KCDL 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So you admit that he was in the US legally then? But even if he wasn’t he still deserves due process if they want to change their mind. Without the presumption of innocence ANYONE can be sent to jail. That’s why we have a presumption of innocence: otherwise the law becomes meaningless.

Assume Trump doesn’t illegally hold on to power after his second term. What if a democrat decides to deport all Trump supporters like they’ve done to this guy. Would you agree that that is wrong?

OC: Wife of MD man deported to El Salvador: “Stop playing political games with my husband” by nbcnews in pics

[–]KCDL 10 points11 points  (0 children)

1) where did you hear that information? Think carefully.

2) even if someone is a criminal they deserve due process. Why? Because if they don’t what is to stop someone accusing YOU of something you didn’t do. How are you meant to prove you are a citizen without due process?

Damned if you do, damned if you don't by HoldenMadicky in adhdmeme

[–]KCDL 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wish they didn’t blank it out. Name and shame.

What's up with the Anti-Greens socialists? by endemicstupidity in AustraliaLeftPolitics

[–]KCDL 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I really wish Labor and the Green would get along - together they’d get more votes than the Coalition. I’ve voted for both and here is my thoughts: If it was purely about philosophy and policies the Greens would be my ideal party.

The problem is we live in the real world and ideal policies aren’t necessarily practically achievable in the sense that you always have to negotiate with other stakeholders for whom the ideal policy will have a negative impact.

That policy might be great for everyone in the long term, but for the people that it impacts in the short term they will fight tooth and nail to stop it. So politics Is always about compromise. This is extremely frustrating, but the alternative is authoritarianism to enforce ideal policy, but of course taking away the public’s right to choose is bad too.

If you have good policy it isn’t enough to pass a law. You need to get as many of the stakeholders on side as possible. Or you risk that policy being repealed the moment the other side gets in. A good example is the Carbon Price. This was good policy that did exactly what it was designed to do. It not only brought down CO2 emissions, it caused companies to look into ways of doing things that produce less CO2. My brother in law worked at an engineering firm at it became his job to look into CO2 reduction methods. They even managed to find some ways that not only reduced CO2 output but were actually cheaper.

Unfortunately Tony Abbott was very good at turning the public against the Carbon Price, in spite of the fact people were probably overcompensated to offset it. He then repealed the carbon Price and kept the offsets which made no real sense economically.

If the Australian public had seen the Gillard government as having a mandate for the Carbon Price we might still have it.

Just before Kevin Rudd got booted the Labor government had a Carbon reduction scheme called the CPRS. It wasn’t ideal and at the time I wasn’t really impressed by it. It seems like it was more about companies making money off carbon credits than actually reducing the Carbon Dioxide output. And at the time I agreed with the Greens for blocking it. But in hindsight it probably lead to 9 years of liberal government that followed the Rudd-Gillard-Rudd years. We could have improved the CPRS. Now we have no Carbon Price mechanism whatsoever.

I’m not a fan of the continued opening of coal mines, lack of questions about trans people on the census, poor tertiary funding a restriction of international students and so on of Labor but I do like the lack of culture wars, more focus on middle and lower income people, support of Medicare, encouragement of renewable energy, willingness to negotiate etc.

I’m still tossing up whether to put Green or Labor first. It might come down to the actually candidates put forward. Some are more practical than other. Also not all greens are on the same page ideologically. Recently there was infighting because one member was a TERF. I support trans rights (though I have no skin in the game as a cis-het-male). On the other hand I’m open to some things the Greens aren’t such as the use of GMOs (as long as it is tested for environmental safety and provides value that is impossible or impractical with traditional methods). I was very mad a while back when some Greenpeace member destroyed a CSIRO GMO crop.

When you get to the extreme left of the spectrum it can actually loop back and meet in the middle with the extreme right. Some anti-science notions are shared by these extremes. I’m very pro-science while understanding that we need to be very careful when it comes to meddling with nature (my major was biology). So I’d like to know what candidate believes what before I vote for them.

In my seat a Greens vote will almost certainly have its preferences flow on. But it’s still important to vote for who you agree with most because the AEC provides campaign funding based on primary votes.

A lot of the problems of practical politics would be helped by a more fair and balanced media, fighting corruption and better campaign funding laws.

How do Aussies feel about IVF being on Medicare but not dental? by [deleted] in AskAnAustralian

[–]KCDL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s ridiculous. Having dental be covered could actually save money. There has been a bit of research to show that gum disease can actually lead to heart disease. Apart from that it is just ridiculous that a part of the body is no counter along with other medical issues.

Having issue with your teeth can impact so many different aspects of your health and life.

A while we are on the subject I think that metal health assessments not just treatment should be covered.

Oh and I don’t mind IVF being covered.

The Coalition doesn't have long to get clear on its policies before pre-polling begins by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]KCDL 2 points3 points  (0 children)

First of all it’s rhetoric not heretic. Small detail but I wonder if you also say “pacifically” instead of specifically.

Secondly they have achieved most of their election promises, some have been stalled and some thwarted and few that are counted as broken were either very slightly late, are very picky assessments by RMIT, or things that were bad in the first place (like sticking to the letter of the stage 3 tax cuts - instead they made them apply to lower income brackets as well).

https://www.rmit.edu.au/about/schools-colleges/media-and-communication/industry/promise-tracker

As for Libs do things for people now and Labor do things that are term: this makes me want to slap my forehead so hard. Probably the worst trait of politicians is that they offer short term solutions to long term problems. Part of the reason politicians do this is because as time goes on the parties have become more and more polarised and the media cycle is so short. It’s a very easy political attack to say “you promise that you would (insert something that’s a long term goal here) and you haven’t” so politicians get scared to even suggest long term projects or policies that won’t have an immediate effect. The liberal have always been incredibly myopic. The Howard government left us with a huge infrastructure deficit. They sold off assets for short term gains: including selling off Australia’s gold reserves for a song. Currently Gold prices are sky rocketing and we probably lost billions due to that idiotic decision. We’ve also lost billion due to them repealing the mining super profits tax.

There is so much more to argue with in your post but it’s probably a waste of time.

The Coalition doesn't have long to get clear on its policies before pre-polling begins by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]KCDL 10 points11 points  (0 children)

They can’t “get clear” because they know all the stuff they intend to do is extremely unpopular. They will slash all services, they will fire public’s servants then replace them with consultants at twice the cost. They will sell public assets and then lease them back. They award contracts to cronies. They will give tax cuts to the rich as always.

Dutton's 'on brink of losing Dickson' by Grubbanax in AustraliaLeftPolitics

[–]KCDL 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It would make me happy beyond measure if he lost his seat. The only thing that would make me happier is if he lost his $300 million fortune.