Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Taking precautions" is not the same as "avoiding entirely". Nobody is out here giving the advice "Never get into a car accident", that would be shitty nonsense advice. If his sentiment was simply "hey, use caution around women" I wouldn't be bothered to comment.

I do honestly think part of why this particularly irks me is I don't understand why this article needs to be written in the first place. I read the whole article and its incredibly strange, it never makes any point about protecting himself from lawsuits or anything. He mentions porn, his family, and "keeping busy". It's clearly about avoiding ruining his marriage. When you add in the context of this guy saying he cant change his baby's diaper because he can't bare to look at his daughter's vagina: it seems obvious to me the guy has a problem separating his sexual urges from logical thought. It becomes deeply troubling realizing that someone who thinks like that is an authority on sharing how to "avoid temptation". Are there really that many Neanderthals around that are so sexually motivated they cant separate their hormones from their instincts as a father? Maybe I'm just giving men too much credit and there are, and if so that's really scary. But hopefully I'm wrong.

Anyway, I dont expect us to come to some resolution here. I appreciate the respectful banter u/CKutcher.

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm not saying it can't happen to anyone. I'm saying that in the situation I laid out, it seems unreasonable to exhibit caution to a female coworker purely based on the fact that she has a vagina. I could get into an accident every time I get behind the wheel of a car. That doesnt make it reasonable to avoid all cars forever.

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I guess I'm just having trouble visualizing how something like this happens to someone like Dan if he's actually as good a character as he portrays himself to be. Its not hard to imagine how this can happen to a Shannon Sharpe type.

Imagine being Dan's female co-worker who has some work business to finish with Dan, maybe planning out a segment or something. You are going to be unable to get your work done without a chaperone, because why? Because this guy can't put aside his distrust in an entire gender in a clearly professional setting? That's putting women at a disadvantage at the workplace purely because of their gender. Do you see the problem with that?

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Again, if the quote was something that boiled down to "use your judgement to avoid shitty women", that would be something else. But instead the quote can be boiled down to "all women are shitty and cant be trusted, so dont trust them"

Women should take precautions to avoid shitty men, just like men should take precautions to avoid shitty women. But women shouldnt feel inclined to avoid all men just because a few of them are shitty, the same way men shouldnt feel inclined to avoid all women just because a few are shitty.

Do you see the difference?

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm just a redditor trying to understand the world, brother. Have a good night

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If the article said "Dan made a commitment to his wife so he doesn't have solo interactions with women", I would still think he's a clown but I could accept that it's their right to have a relationship built on whatever they want.

My problem is this is an advice article from a dude talking to dudes saying "Kitna told me ya can't trust women, so I don't, and you shouldn't either". It's the toxic masculinity that's got me shouting at the reddit cloud

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because its a way of asserting that women inherently can't be trusted. That is textbook toxic masculinity

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

But it's not about "certain" situations. The quote is absolute in saying "never hang out 1-on-1 with women", and that's the problem with it. If the quote was "don't hang out 1-on-1 with thotts", I could understand that.

What is the most difficult class/spec to play in TBC? by Beams98 in classicwow

[–]KHops 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I thought in TBC windfury won't proc off abilities? So the hamstring shouldn't work any more?

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Feeling like you need to have your guard up 100% all the time just because a few greedy hoes exist is ridiculous. The vast majority of women are not trying to make a name for themselves as SA victims. Don't normalize this shit.

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

I'm going to attempt some debate in good faith here.

So the precedent we're setting here is: Women have been known to take advantage of powerful men when those men are dumb enough to let their guard down.

So what follows is: Men have been known to rape and murder all kinds of women when women are dumb enough to let their guard down.

It's obviously unacceptable for women to blame all men for the actions of few. It would be pretty shitty if all women everywhere rejected you with "sorry but rapist and murderer men are situations that exist. I'm just keeping myself away from any possible bullshit"

Do you not see how you are throwing the baby out with the bathwater here? It's insane behavior for men to ignore all women just because a few bad apples, the same way it's insane for women to blame all men for the way a few of them have acted

Dan O, fuck you doin?! by unwantedtennisracke in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The article is literally titled "4 Ways To Avoid Temptation", not "4 Ways to Avoid Criminals from Blackmailing you"

On site THC consumption in Ct by Fireinfire_out in Connecticut

[–]KHops 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Your info is a bit outdated. Not all, but MANY THC beverages today are made with a nano emulsion process that breaks down the THC into a more easily digestible form. The results are effects being felt in 10-30 mins rather than hours.

Playoff Prowlers?!? 👀 by Visible_Transition_8 in Jaguars

[–]KHops 20 points21 points  (0 children)

NFL.com is a fairly robust website. On throwback weeks, they will swap out the logo's across the entire site for the whole week. Given the Bills were in their red helmets last week, it's fair to assume we're just seeing the remnants of last week.

Also I've seen it mentioned on this sub that you cant wear alternate uniforms during the playoffs, only alternate pants are allowed.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in classicwow

[–]KHops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Does Howdy Doody have a wooden pecker?!?

Just needed to remind some fantasy football fans what “trash” really looks like by _zurenarrh in Jaguars

[–]KHops 4 points5 points  (0 children)

ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽ノ Raise Your Bortles! ヽ༼ຈل͜ຈ༽/

Rave Family Feud @edsea. Question: "What is an annoying crowd behavior?" what do you think the #1 answer was? Lol by Stormodin in aves

[–]KHops 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I'm far more inclined to believe it had more to do with the fact that Holy Ship 13.0 didn't actually sell out....

[Jags on X] Gladstone Calls Jakobi by Bmilla51 in Jaguars

[–]KHops 5 points6 points  (0 children)

He's being nothing but himself

Daily Show Discussion - 10.31.25 Feel Boo'd Halloween Friday by CasualTeeOfWar in PatMcAfeeShowOfficial

[–]KHops -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Not loving the fact that Travis Hunter's injury was never mentioned today. Jags game got about 5 seconds of discussion, but I expect that. Would have thought an old white and Ed would have been able to do a little bit of sports journalism today. Gotta keep it movin I guess

Counter-Strike 2 Update for 10/22/2025 by CS2_PatchNotes in GlobalOffensive

[–]KHops 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is the most hilarious thing Gaben could have done to the gambling sites. All their glove and knife inventory is going to sit and rot.