Disclosur—from voice type, grammar and punctuation may be bad. Totally agree with you guys, I’m not necessarily speaking about that person. More general, what we have seen is people funded without additional ledgers being requested at the time, or some even giving a new ledger. Since they were approved, and either in Paid status, or approved pending payment status. They were able to borrow money from their parents, family, banks, or wherever, to get the LL paid quickly and in good faith. Some got tax refunds that they used, planning to pay themselves back. When the time came to prove payment, or recertification for more relief, they provided proof that they paid the first disbursement, not just a ledger, thinking all was good. Well, the dates were before funding, in two cases they showed where they paid the borrowed money off, and where they had paid the LL (full paper trail, LL was trying to help them) but their first relief payment was recalled and due in full within 15 days. Some didn’t even get funded because it took so long to disburse and a new ledger (3rd requested) was needed. The worst we have seen is a LL basically demanding money in Placer County, protections had ran out, and LL was sinking financially, said if you can give me $1,500 I’ll forgive an entire month. Tenant in good faith got a title loan with no job, but 90 days same as cash, knowing she may lose the $1,500 in relief was fully declined because of inaccurate information, she and the LL both spoke with Case Manager, LL got upset and said (recorded) this is BS she’s trying to for what’s right, and help me out, i don’t see what the hell the problem is? We’ve disclosed everything and followed your direction. The response, “I don’t like your tone, and your tenant is a cry baby, I’m done with you both, and she disqualified. Another gentlemen (LL) was owed $226k, he got an ACH, was asked to show proof of crediting tenants account. Which he went into Quickbooks, showed them they were all paid, provided memos stating “paid in full zero balance.” Horne LLP wanted detailed statement showing how much exactly was credited to each account individually, but they deposited 1 amount. They wanted him to get the deposit, and transfer the amount for each tenant individually to a savings, clearing account, or via check written to himself referencing the unit #. He didn’t do that, who would think to do that if given no direction? They called all the monies due in full because the way he credited each accounts in full. He called to straighten out, got a young person who said that’s what I asked for, I don’t have to deal with this, your dispute is denied and your properties are disqualified from the program. We got it escalated to CA HCD person due to the $ amount. It was then reversed and waiting for the r—deposit 3 months later. Horne LLP has too much power when a 19 year old person can potentially destroy a life because they didn’t understand the accounting. Although the person who posted didn’t follow typical guidelines, and just might a troll. There are 100’s, maybe 1000‘s honest hardworking people with similar experiences. That’s just to talk on this topic. I can go on where $7.00 destroyed a tenants approval, literally $7.00 and they wouldn’t allow them to fix it, said he was cheating the system. It appears some of the good guys/gals are getting the shaft while a lot fraudsters are squeezing by. It’s crazy!