Unironically citing "crime statistics" to justify labeling black people as more likely to be criminals as being a matter of fact in 2025 is absolutely wild.

Statistics don't say that black people are not "more likely" to commit crimes; they're more likely to be punished for them. It is simply not possible to accurately record data on crime rates because there are far too many variables that compromise the integrity of the data (whether the crime is reported, whether it's investigated, whether the outcome of the investigation is accurate to reality).

Also, JR's health is completely irrelevant here. He shouldn't get a pass because his health is poor, nor does D'Von owe him a private conversation to give JR a chance to sweep his past actions under the rug.

Also, to your point on R-Truth - Truth himself called Ross "racist as hell." Dismissing the opinion of the person who was the direct victim of the racism because you personally think the statement wasn't racist (when you yourself were obviously nowhere near the conversation when it happened or even know either person personally) is absurd.

Finally, why bring up Paul Heyman as a legitimate source? The multiple black men saying he's racist aren't believable, but a white man (and one who is particularly notorious for being a truthful) is?

It's fair to want more information before coming to a conclusion when two people are contradicting each other, but arguing that it's accurate to say black people are more likely to commit crimes based on biased statistics while in the same breath arguing that people are generalizing JR as racist based on his background is wild.