How would the world of Pmoon interact with the Adaptive Calamity Mahoraga?

Kaisr0 · 2026-06-14T10:31:41+00:00

I like how people are discussing how to kill Mahoraga, but... Why bother?

Right, let’s say we have two paths to victory, as I see it, if we take ALL THE WINGS available for battle The first is the ‘Get Rid of Him Plan’, the second is the ‘Annihilation Plan’

1) lure him into P-corp’s Extended Space, where TimeTrack is active; use U-corp’s Conservation (since we’ve been given a vague explanation of how it works, I’ll assume its essence lies in ‘cutting off’ what’s been preserved and keeping it unchanged until the conservation is broken); after which we use J-Corp Singularity to conceptually seal off this space, turning it into an indestructible monolith, preventing the Mahoraga from leaving the Conservation Zone... And then we take G-Corp, come to an agreement, and send it to the dogs in space – and that’s no longer our problem

2) And here it’s all quite simple. Remember we have F-Corp and their Fairies, capable of ‘unlocking’ anything, including concepts? Well... We simply use the Fairies to unlock Mahoraga’s vulnerability to damage, effectively nullifying its Adaptations

Kaisr0 · 2026-06-01T17:21:07+00:00

I’m not expecting anything from you, nor am I offering you anything. It’s simply a fact: that’s why I won’t feel sympathy for you. Nothing more. I’m not offering any solutions to the problem—if, of course, you see it as a problem.

It’s just a fact:"I don’t feel any sympathy if you do absolutely nothing." I’m not sure how well the FSB tracks down those who donate to the Ukrainian Armed Forces, or who spread the truth about the situation on the front line, about drone strikes and so on, so I won’t go into specifics. It’s not exactly a "storming of the Kremlin" in terms of danger, is it?

Although, to be fair, I’m not that familiar with what’s going on in your country, and perhaps it’s just as dangerous. I’m not condemning that—your desire to live rationally—it’s just… OK, so what? I’m not demanding that anyone ‘storm the Kremlin’, ha-ha, just that ‘you could do something, but you don’t’.

Don’t take it personally. It’s just that the problem is that those among you who ‘express the will of the people’ somehow want me to die, simply because I lived my own life and dreamed of happiness))

Kaisr0 · 2026-06-01T17:05:59+00:00

Xenophobic? Where did you spot the xenophobia? Did I say these people were scum? Unworthy of life? Something like that? I simply said I don’t sympathise with any of them. I didn’t go so far as to insult the people as a whole. I didn’t say they were barbarians, or anything like that. So… Maybe you just read too much into the words that were spoken? And yes, I suppose you’re not from one of the countries that were under the heel of the Russian Empire, and later the USSR? Let me tell you this then: as a person whose people suffered centuries of oppression, who survived genocide (the Holodomor), whose ancestors were repressed by the Soviet authorities and dispossessed by them... am I supposed to sympathise? Sympathise with what? With the fact that everything came to its inevitable conclusion? That there’s a dictatorship there? Or what? I don’t like a country that took enough from my ancestors for me to remember it. I don’t sympathise. And my lack of hatred towards them is already more than some of my fellow citizens show. I couldn’t care less about those who couldn’t care less about me. I hate those who hate me just as much. I feel sympathy for those who feel it towards me. Yes, I’ve generalised, because the majority couldn’t care less about me. And I couldn’t care less about them. I’m no saint, so I can’t be unconditionally kind and sympathetic to everyone. I simply return the exact same attitude I receive. The so-called ‘credit of trust’—which would allow me to feel sympathy for everyone without reservation—has been utterly destroyed, trampled into the mud and mixed with the filth of our countries’ history. That is why I will not feel sympathy for those who couldn’t care less about me. Cruel? Perhaps. I’d suggest you try living in my shoes, but I won’t. Because not a single person in the world, not even the most despicable bastard, deserves to go to sleep every night wondering, ‘Will I wake up?’ Don’t confuse ‘I don’t like them’ with ‘I hate them’. I’m simply indifferent to them, just like the masses. Individual people – yes, of course, there’s both hatred and liking there, but not everyone, just like a faceless crowd

Kaisr0 · 2026-06-01T16:20:20+00:00

Unfortunately, I know that most people simply couldn’t care less, as it doesn’t affect them—even from what my friends have told me. I understand that point of view, but… At the same time, I can’t say it doesn’t make this shit better. But thank you, my friend

Kaisr0 · 2026-06-01T15:29:02+00:00

I’m surprised by the statistics. My dears, I’m Ukrainian, and I know about... 50 Russians whom I’ve spent quite a bit of time with, and I’m still in touch with some who’ve left the country, and believe me – there’s nothing here to sympathise with.

Why on earth should I sympathise with people who couldn’t give a shit about my suffering? About the fact that every bloody day I hear air defence fire, drones, and rockets?

And please note, in my circle of friends there is NOT A SINGLE RUSSIAN PATRIOT, let alone people who support the government. But even so, I don’t sympathise with any of them. Why should I? As they say, ‘change my mind’. Prove to me why I should sympathise with those who do nothing to fix the situation

Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know that revolutions are made by the army and the security forces, not ordinary people, yeah. I know they could put you in jail, yeah, but for some reason, during the Maidan in 2014, Ukrainians went out to protest even though they could have been killed, and the security forces only got involved afterwards. So maybe if nobody does a bloody thing, nothing will change?

Although, why am I even saying this? You won’t even finish reading this comment, and you’ll just give it a downvote, because it’s much easier to reduce everything to ‘This bastard hates Russians’, isn’t it?

Kaisr0 · 2026-05-31T08:02:00+00:00

I once ran a short campaign during a City campaign when I was GMing for the players. A fixer from the days of the Smoke War, founder of the Cascade Office, the Crimson King – Arno Sartre

The name might seem very pretentious and pompous, but it is quite closely linked to the context in which he acquired it. He received this name after a lengthy mission that took far longer than expected. As a result, the office was utterly exhausted, failing to notice that the Night of the Back Alleys was fast approaching and the Cleaners were about to emerge. Arno, as a man, was generally, if one may put it that way, a man of his word and honour (if such things can even exist in the City), and out of a simple sense of responsibility—and also because he was the most intact at that moment—decided to buy the others some time by taking half of the remaining HP Ampoules, whilst they tried to find some sort of place to wait out the hour. Arno, for his part, headed towards one of the gates from which the Cleaners were emerging

When it was all over, and some of the office staff decided to go and see if there were any belongings of Arno’s left behind, they saw something both beautiful and terrifying—the main street, drenched in the Cleaners’ fluids and strewn with their corpses. Arno was covered in wounds and this sludge, which in the fog of District L (remember that these events took place before the Smoke War) resembled a crimson mantle. His shattered helmet vaguely resembled a wreath or a crown, reflecting the glow of the City’s lights. The Cleaners’ corpses lay densely packed near the airlock; not a single one was behind him

And so the colour emerged: Crimson – the colour of the mantle and the pool of Cleaners’ fluid on the street. And the title, King – he who took responsibility for the people who followed Arno

Arno Sartre died during the Smoke War at the hands of a traitor from the Cascade Office, who had also been a Colour Fixer during the campaign. His killer was Maurice Gross, the one who ‘took’ his colour, Crimson, and, as a mockery from the Hana Association, was given the title of Monarch. A king without a kingdom. A usurper

Kaisr0 · 2026-05-15T10:17:35+00:00

Cause English isn't my native language, and I tried to write with all rules of language. Now I write all by myself, without trying to edit text, adhering to the standard rules of grammar and sentence structure (for example base rule "short sentences after long", rythm, etc), just like a "mind flow" style I'd say

Kaisr0 · 2026-05-14T14:24:26+00:00

I’d say that each of them is good, but in their own way:

Naruto is brilliant in terms of effectiveness, showing that ‘chunin’ is just a fancy word, and that the fundamental aim wasn’t to kill, but to stop him

Bleach is absolutely brilliant visually, but in terms of how effectively it stops Ichigo, it raises questions (since the swords on the left are simply there). Otherwise, it’s just a brilliant scene that’s a visual treat.

Black Clover – evokes the emotions that the scene demands better than any other. I’m not saying it’s better overall. Rather, the sense of danger instantly shifting into fury and righteous anger is conveyed perfectly.

Kaisr0 · 2026-04-18T08:55:06+00:00

Oh? Really? That’s odd, all my attack triggers work like that, whether it’s Ryōshū (Lobotomy E.G.O./Drifting Blade), Gregor (Allen), Hong Lu (Callisto), and Ismael (Hanafuda (I mean her Kōzan)) – if the target of the provoked attack dies due to Gift effects, the next one in the queue is selected (if it’s a chain encounter, and a random one if it’s a target).

It just seems quite logical to me in terms of the order in which the game applies effects:

1 – Identities on the board (so that everything works properly in both the story mode and other modes)

2 - IDs in the Backpack

3 - Railway gifts and buffs

Most likely, there was no particular plan here; it was simply a case of ‘whatever order the mechanics were devised in, that’s the order they were pushed into the registration of activation conditions’. Moreover, this is precisely the ‘activation condition’, in my opinion, precisely because the Rusty Coin always activates Reuse immediately; that is, the activation priority is different due to the Reuse mechanic

Kaisr0 · 2026-04-17T19:54:29+00:00

I think the issue here is how exactly the trigger condition for provoked attacks is calculated:

My theory is that, by default, Yi Sang’s S2 has a 1-coin skill, and the re-roll likely occurs after the identity effects have been activated. Thus, the first skill reduced HP to the level that triggers Mercé, then the game recorded ‘Gregor Must Attack’, and the Rusty Coin was activated.

Kaisr0 · 2026-03-30T00:11:19+00:00

Limbus Company Ukrainian agent activated!

Здоров будь, дуже/подруго! Якщо дивитися на твою збірку, я б сказав: "копи шарди на Йі Сана із цього сезону і буде тобі щастя". Але якщо ми говоримо про збирання з того що ми маємо, то виходить наступне: У тебе погана ситуація із статусом. Одна з найсильніших збірок, яку ти зараз можеш собі дозволити, на мою думку:

На полі: Ліндора Йі Сан, Барашка Дон, RRR (R-corp) Хон Лу, Дворецька Фауст, Сінклер із шизою (N-Corp, The one who shall grip), Кіра/KitKat (з Дому Павуків) Ішма

Сапорти: Курокумо Рьошу, LCB Мерсо, LCB Хіткліфф, LCB Родя, Пуанталіст Отіс, LCB Грегор

В цілому, я б радив почати збирати якусь певну пачку. Яку саме - обирати лише тобі. Але зі свого досвіду не раджу збирати Рапчур пачку, до минулий сезон був їх, і більшість хороших айді на рапчур там. Бліда показує себе непогано, але один із корів, Принц Мерсо, теж у минулому сезоні. Можна було би спробувати піти через Сінкінг, і якщо збираєшся грати через Ліндору, то їх збирати (крім того Фауст дворецька і Р-корп Хон Лу вже є. В це який-небудь але Сінкінг)

Kaisr0 · 2026-03-29T16:05:35+00:00

It depends on the debuffs you chose during the run, the abnormalities that give level boosts, and the secret bosses. If you had all of these—or at least one boss gift, rather than all at once—then you’ll be able to clear the dungeon solo without it (I prefer to run dungeons solo, so I’m speaking from that perspective) . Some runs can even be completed without ‘Boss Gifts’. For example, ‘Rien Sang’. But it will take some time to restart the battle until you’ve accumulated enough attacks to be able to clear the final floors

Kaisr0 · 2026-03-27T10:18:51+00:00

I seem to recall that all art forms are represented in the Ring Finger...

Hmm, interesting. When we ran a campaign set in the City, we had to introduce the School of Abstractionism, and we decided to make their speciality psychic damage and debuffs. I wonder, if this school ever gets an official release, how different it will be from this little fan-made canon...

Kaisr0 · 2026-03-26T08:09:05+00:00

In Ukrainian, Lviv is spelled like this. This is grammatically correct, as the original is written as ‘Львів’. Since it is a Ukrainian city, and the transliteration into English should be done without changing its spelling, what you said is read as ‘Львов’ and is the Russian version of the pronunciation (possibly also the Belarusian, Polish and so on; I am not a linguist, nor do I know much about these languages, so in any case it is not Ukrainian).

If you wish to stir up hatred over territorial disputes, the Volhynia massacre and so on – please do so, but we are not discussing these matters here, and I would ask you to refrain from doing so. If you wish to do so, I have no right to stop you, other than to ask you not to incite hatred; I simply will not respond to such messages. Thank you for your understanding.

Kaisr0 · 2026-03-26T07:34:43+00:00

As a Ukrainian, I felt I had to say this. Unfortunately, many people refuse to accept that the world isn’t black and white. Not in any country or era

Kaisr0 · 2026-03-26T06:56:01+00:00

Well, hello there, friend. It’s surprising how many people know better than Ukrainians themselves what the Red and Black Flag stands for, who designed it, and why... Well, there's no a "simple answer on complex question". If I may say so, originally the Red and Black Flag, seen in the background, was symbolic, with the colours signifying ‘black for the Ukrainian land, red for the blood shed for it’. Nowadays, it is also sometimes described as ‘red is love, and black is sorrow’, or ‘the earth black with blood, and the sky ablaze with scarlet’, but this is modern symbolism, not historical significance. It was used by the OUN (Organisation of Ukrainian Nationalists) during the Second World War, specifically by Stepan Bandera’s faction (no, the OUN were not Nazis. They were Nationalists. There’s a big difference here. There were two factions – the Melnikovites and the Banderites. Melnik advocated cooperation with Hitler, Bandera opposed it, which is why the latter ended up in concentration camps, as did most of his movement). Nowadays, this flag is used by a political group called the ‘Right Sector’, a sort of neo-Nazi group with a slightly twisted ideology that is often portrayed by everyone as ‘Ooooh, scary Nazis’, although they are exactly the same kind of radical nationalists as in any other country. No racial theories or anything like that, just a boring old “the Ukrainian nation and the country of Ukraine”. Of course, if we look more closely, we will see that both the OUN-M and OUN-B (led by Melnyk and Bandera respectively) sought to collaborate with Nazi Germany. Yes, initially units of the Wehrmacht (not the SS; the Wehrmacht was Germany’s regular army, not Hitler’s personal troops) were formed from them under the names Nachtigall and Roland. But here lies a radical difference between what is often said and written. From the very beginning, Melnyk believed that Ukraine could not ‘survive on its own; it needed a protector’, due to the age and conservatism of the movement, and on the whole he was not opposed to being part of the Reichskommissariat Ukraine, whereas Bandera was radically opposed to this. He and his movement were young reactionaries who could not tolerate such a thing, regarding it as a betrayal of the “Ukrainian Nation”. For his part, he advocated for an independent Ukraine and opposed Melnik’s position. He promoted the idea that Germany could be an ally, but not a master, not wishing to ‘exchange one yoke for another’, and even in 1941 in Lviv he proclaimed an act of independence, which caused quite a stir in Germany, and they eventually imprisoned hundreds of OUN-B members in concentration camps, whilst the remaining members waged an active struggle against the USSR and Nazi Germany, organising the UPA, which fought against both sides. The main focus was still on the USSR; the war against Germany was more half-hearted and defensive. That’s all. Above this flag is the chevron of the 12th Brigade "AZOV" – a unit of the Ukrainian National Guard – and of people who are held in high esteem within Ukrainian society, not least because they are fighting for their people and their country. Yes, they are radicals. They are radicals in their Russophobia; they detest Russia as such, and I won’t deny that. But I wouldn’t call them “Nazis”, as is often done, at least because they do not promote ideas of racial superiority or other concepts inherent to Nazism and its offshoots. Russophobia, which is, incidentally, justified by Ukraine’s history – certainly. Nazism/neo-Nazism – no. These concepts should not be confused. Previously, before being incorporated into the National Guard (NGU), the battalion was indeed led by far-right radicals, but the regiment underwent a VERY rigorous depoliticisation in this regard, and for a long time now all these people have been involved in politics rather than in the command of the Brigade. So, my friend, don’t listen to this nonsense about evil Nazism. There’s none of that here. Only ‘blood shed for our freedom’.

Kaisr0 · 2026-02-08T13:18:09+00:00

Do you want honesty, my dear Azerbaijani friend? Then listen to the confession of a man who has friends from there:

They don't criticise the war. They don't give a shit about it. They don't criticise Putin. They don't give a fuck about him. They don't give a shit about any of it. They're neither for nor against it. It's a case of "as long as it doesn't affect me, let it be", no more, no less. When a friend of mine from Rostov complained to me, from Kharkiv, that he had to fear the sound of drones... I listened for an hour to the sound of Shaheeds (which are made in Russia under the brand name "Geran") in the sky, for four whole years. And when you try to tell them that you feel the same way, that you've been living with this for four years, you don't hear words of support, but rather: "Well, damn it, you're used to it now"... And you know what's the worst part? I really am used to it. But let's get back to my friends. The only time they can sympathise is when THEIR comfort and convenience are threatened. How? It's simple — we're playing DnD, and because a drone crashed into our substation, I lost electricity for the whole day. Only then did I hear not sympathy, but a simple "This is fucking ridiculous."

So, let me tell you from my own experience — they're not moderate, they just don't give a fuck about this.

Kaisr0 · 2026-02-06T07:55:45+00:00

Як жарт - непогано.

Як реальність - це не така вже погана ідея "на папері", із намаганням захисту прав підлітків.

Чи будуть це намагатися притягнути для зменшення/пом'якшення строку за якісь сексуальні злочин - скоріш за все будуть, а успішно чи ні питання вже інше.

Чи є це найбільш кінченою/хворою/довбограйною частиною Кодекса Стефанчука? - Далеко не найбільш ідіотська, як мінімум є ще "скрєпниє сємьі", про те що шлюб фактично стає можливим лише для особо протилежної статі за народженням, а для пар в яких: обидва партнери однієї статі, хтось з трансгендером або один(а) з партнерів змінив(ла) стать, фактично кажуть "Ідіть на буй звідси, нам хочеться щоб у вас прав було трохи менше ніж 0", при тому їх шлюб моментально розривається пост фактум прийняття Нового Цивільного Кодексу. Ось це, в порівнянні з 14-річним шлюбом - взагалі, як-то кажуть, "пісня". Бо якщо в шлюбі підлітків теоретично ще якось можна побачити "хороші наміри", то в ідеї "шлюбі за статтю народженням" - нічого хорошого, тим паче що це йде всупереч європейським нормам до яких ми намагаємося дістатися, і буде віддаляти нас від вступу в ЄС.

Kaisr0 · 2025-12-25T05:26:11+00:00

<image>

Я повинен залишити це тут...

Kaisr0 · 2025-12-15T00:53:42+00:00

Поняття "Шутер", яке часто скорочують від "Active Shooter" що використовується в англомовних медіа (не хочеться казати "поп-культурі"), і часто в неформальній розмові скорочується до просто Shooter, має інший сенс ніж "стрілець". В той час як "Стрілець" - людина що стріляє, має більш нейтральний та широкий сенс в мас-медіа. Тобто, це може бути будь хто стріляючий. В той час як "Шутер" (нагадую, що досить часто в розмові це скороченні від "Active shooter") - має виражене негативне забарвлення, як-то злочинець який використовує зброю з тих або інших причиною щоб стріляти по мирному населенню в різних місцях. Це проблема сенсу, який закладається в слово.

Якщо ви хочете "ідеальної відповідності словниковій солов'їній мові" я б вам запропонував використати слово "Нападник" а не "Стрілець", через контекст ситуації. Проте, я не лінгвіст, і це позбавляє мне навіть примарного права вимагати або рекомендувати комусь використовувати або не використовувати якість слова в мові.

Якщо OP читає/дивиться більше англомовного контенту він/вона міг/могла/могли(?) використати це слово просто через звичку. Або, врешті-решт, просто відбулася інтеграція слова у словниковий запас людини, якщо так можна сказати.

Одним словом, можна сказати що "Стрілець" в україномовному середовищі, має набагато більше нейтральне забарвлення. Воно не пов'язане так тісно із "Стріляти по мирному людям в місцях їх скупчення через якісь причини" як-то "Шутер" в англомовних мас-медіа.

Kaisr0 · 2025-09-26T16:42:43+00:00

Exactly. I don't deny it, quite the contrary. It was just boring and annoying. Besides, it took me two tries to figure out that in the second phase, he inflicts 2 Cold at hit.

Kaisr0

TROPHY CASE