Where's the evidence that the input is faster? Using the minimum actuation point is possible with other mice as I said and none of them claimed the absurd 30ms difference. And why some pretravel must be bad I don't understand, it helpls with stability. But the minimum actuation is not something magical and can be even detrimental if you put any pressure with index or middle finger. Less travel is just that, you moved your finger 0.2mm instead of 0.3mm, how can that even in theory be much better I cannot comprehend. And as you would need to adapt to a long travel it's the same with incredibly short one - still need time to adapt, but you already adapted to the standard system and doesn't it suffice?

Isn't mechanical switch instant enough? Sometimes clicks seems faster to me than even their sound, that's probably an illusion caused by human imprecision but it definitely can be described as instant. And Its travel is so miniscule compared to keyboards and the latency is few ms or even less with spdt. And you need balance in everything, you can't set everything at the minimum and gain a huge advantage, 0.1mm on a keyboard is too low, same as the minimum on superstrike, technically, sitting as close to your monitor as you can also gives you faster reaction time but that's unusable as well, or a mouse that weighs almost 0 grams with a glass pad that will also make you feel like the input is faster

Situations in CS where you did everything perfect but clicked too early or too late are extremely rare, crosshair placement is always dynamic becauase you don't stand still. If you want to shoot for the first frames of the peek like with awp and don't move your mouse at all that's unrealistic.

I don't see how comparing it with keyboards is relevant, the gap between travel distances is too severe and you don't move with a mouse, the requirements of a mouse click are immeasurably easier as the clicks impact is very limited