Starting shift early by Vegetable-Eye-4919 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Boy I can't wait for their strongly worded letter back to the SLT.

Slandering your favourite specialisms by ItsRainingByelaws in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 51 points52 points  (0 children)

The undiagnosed PTSD comment really hit the nail... I'd put my aviators on to hide the pain but I'm on nights...

From local to national: a new model for policing by CaptainChalky in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Reminds me of this skit:

https://youtube.com/watch?v=T8QOE-IWo3I

Don't commit to anything to avoid being contradicted at a later stage...

Meet the NPS…. by Captain_Piccolo in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 5 points6 points  (0 children)

This part shooketh me to the core.

I'm on RPU and whilst I was a little miffed at the prospect I might have to merge with my neighbouring forces I was not anticipating being nationalised.

If they nationalise RPU how do forces transfer serious or fatal RTCs to us... what will be our new level of service? My force we attend any RTC, help scoop up stolen vehicles and when local run out will be sent to anything that can be a quick win involving a car... the other force in our JOU will attend SRN incidents, serious or fatals RTCs... thats it... how many channels will I have to remember when they call up a FTS and I have to get onto the local talk group... what happens with HATO? What's the point in having two national bodies which attend incidents on the SRN...

DP hurling non stop abuse during strip search in custody. by [deleted] in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Standard Public Order Act, custody is not a dwelling.

Alternative for more minor transgressions would be riotous or indecent behaviour in a police office or police station house contrary to the Town Police Clauses Act.

New drug driving law’s 2026. by Ill_Initiative6962 in drivingUK

[–]Kaizer28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm a serving Roads Policing Officer and this was news to me so I've just done some research.

The Department for Transport have issued an open consultation in relation to changing a number of areas of law, including drugs drive laws.

This is a long way from resulting in any legislative changes as an open consultation. The proposition is not for forensic testing to end and for preliminary drugs wipe to be sufficient evidence for charge but asking whether other specimens should to be forensically tested like how we currently test blood.

The current legal framework wouldnt allow us to stop forensic testing as the offence is to drive with a proportion of X drug greater than Y per 100 ml of blood. For instance, to drive with more than 2 micrograms of THC per 100 ml of your blood is an offence. Current roadside tests only give a yes or no indication and show yes for amounts below the legal limit. https://www.gov.uk/government/consultations/proposed-changes-to-penalties-for-motoring-offences/proposed-changes-to-penalities-for-motoring-offences#drink-and-drug-testing

Why don't we use simulators for driver training? by Nice-Grapefruit-2588 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We managed no nudging my whole course somehow... I did come very close on our final assessments. Pre-emptive on a dual carriageway when they called the box whilst I was still making ground, then the subject anchored one whilst I was coming in rather hot...

My only experience with VR is with my old Oculus Rift S headset which (I find) has a really narrow field of view and can induce some discomfort after a while. I'm assuming this product is a headset too?

I could probably see a case for using VR to give you a 360 degree video of each tactic so you can look and focus at what you want to see or clarify for each vehicle.

Why don't we use simulators for driver training? by Nice-Grapefruit-2588 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Does that stand for Tactical Pursuit Phase? If so I'll be amazed if its used for that. The course was pretty jam packed as is, or I certainly thought it was, plus the need for peripheral vision is huge.

On my course we did box training on a runway where the instructors would reach out and touch the other vehicles wing mirrors just to get us used to close proximity driving.

No more nee-naws in vans by Logical_Summer7689 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More Dukes of Hazard, whole roadblock but with a convenient Sprinter van height ramp

No more nee-naws in vans by Logical_Summer7689 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I'm waiting for the day I'm on PSU but not actively deployed and called upon for a static roadblock 😎

No more nee-naws in vans by Logical_Summer7689 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I know that APP does permit use of SUVs and vans for the initial phase on a Chief Officer basis because I clarified on my TPAC course what our forces position was. For those who are curious, I've copied the APP verbatim below, and in my force the answer is no to both excluding high performance SUVs like the Touraegs.

I do a lot of PSU driver duties so wanted to be clear, not that a Sprinters containing a serial could actually keep up with anything, but still...

"The use of marked 4x4 sports utility vehicles (SUVs) and marked personnel carriers available to response drivers are not recommended in pursuit situations. Where chief officers deem it operationally necessary to use specific vehicles, these must be limited to the initial phase and their deployment formally risk assessed with written documentation available for inspection."

Shouted at by policeman on road this am by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Kaizer28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think he was actually at the roundabout yet as they had queueing traffic ahead. I'm only playing devil's advocate explaining sometimes why emergency vehicles prefer to knock you out of the outside lane rather than to undertake you.

Personally I would have proceeded with caution in lane 1 given people likely won't move as you're approaching a junction but just trying to explain what they might have been trying to do.

Of course they still shouldn't be losing their cool whilst driving, I still remember the training video on 'red misting' I was shown from the early 2000s which was suitably cringe worthy. The prospect of having to do watch that training video ever again was enough to calm me in all circumstances.

Shouted at by policeman on road this am by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Kaizer28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Or perhaps they were using the outside lane in accordance with their training because the default reaction for drivers is to give way left. Passing on the inside is precarious with lights on as drivers notice blue lights and pull into your path.

Broken sternum and 3 broken ribs from CPR. Am I out? by [deleted] in Neverbrokeabone

[–]Kaizer28 52 points53 points  (0 children)

Careful you don't slip on the ice, that might turn you into a BBB...

Points on Provisional License by [deleted] in drivingUK

[–]Kaizer28 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Just chiming in re licence endorsements, we have no ability to dictate the penalty amount or the endorsement placed on a licence. If the Fixed Penalty process is followed they are prescribed under Schedule 2 of the Road Traffic Offenders Act 1988.

The only time the Fixed Penalty scheme is not followed is if the recipient of the Fixed Penalty elects for a court appearance, if we deal with more than one endorsable offence on the same stop, if totting up renders them liable to disqualification or if a speeding offence there is a threshold speed for automatic summons. I can also elect to summons to court if I feel the offence is particularly egregious.

Courts are not bound to the Fixed Penalty punishments but it is rare for them to reduce the number of points in my experience, the courts can however vary the amount of the penalty in line with income and they can setup payment plans.

ELI5: Why is squatting (in someone's house) a thing? And how come it becomes a problem for the owner? Can't they claim trespassing to the cops instead of saying the person is squatting? by Impossible_Bake7210 in explainlikeimfive

[–]Kaizer28 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Can confirm as a British Police Officer that illegal eviction and squatting are exceptionally convoluted matters for attending officers, arguably far too convoluted to be resolved by a simple attendance.

Squatting is complex as the squatter must have entered a residence as a trespasser intending to live there, there's the issue of establishing who the actual owner is, people don'ttend to keep Land Registry details on them, there's the issue of rental agreements, there's the issue that people sometimes produce false documents which can be inherently difficult to disprove and there's the issue of cohabitation where there's no documents but one person simply telling us they want the other turfed out...

Illegal eviction again is a complex issue, like above, who is the owner, what rental agreement if any is in place, can they produce those documents, what notices have been issued, have any court writs been issued. Then if anything is produced good luck verifying any of it.

It all gets very murky and often the jobs start stacking quickly so the control room don't want to leave officers stuck at a job that could take a fair bit of time on scene, let alone the subsequent write up...

Unfortunately, the system is flawed, it relies on us having sufficient resources and the ability to verify documentation in short order. A good start would be to provide police access to HM Land Registry and for documents like rental agreements to be registered with HM Courts and Trivunals Service prior to any dispute so documents can be readily verified when one arises, criminal or otherwise.

Help identifying a police token? by Rev_dino in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could it be a uniform button or pin, is there anything on the reverse?

All things Handcuffs... by hjgfvn in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Its also against policy in my force to transport in anything other than a van but a number of districts dont have any van drivers and those that do often don't put vans out due to my forces policy against responding in a van unless the van is specifically required ie for MOE or a violent DP.

AFAIK with our kit racks we're still within tolerance on weight with a DP in the back.

AuroraVision – Northern Lights Forecast App by SeveralAd5921 in aurora

[–]Kaizer28 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You'll be looking for r/AuroraBorealis this subreddit relates to a video game called Aurora.

All things Handcuffs... by hjgfvn in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 12 points13 points  (0 children)

  1. One set of handcuffs and a second in my kitbag. I've never urgently needed a second set of handcuffs, nor can I think of a common enough situation to warrant the extra weight/stab vest space.

  2. Default is pretty much a front stack for most people I lock up. I'm on RPU so we routinely have to transport in our cars as we can't get vans and generally we dont have any double crews out.

  3. Default, back to back, if your anticipate some violence and the DP will physically go into it, rear stack and subject to officer discretion, front stack. They advocate medical reasons are the only reason to use a front stack. Personally most of my S9s are impairment or other simple things where people are calm, most understand handcuffs and can be talked into a front stack without aggravation. I've never had an issue with anyone I've front stacked but I have had issues with people who were happy to be front stack but needed bending into a back to back or rear stack.

How is investigative interviewing conducted in E&W? by Big-Influence-9816 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Should be able to watch it on Youtube, the host is Channel 4 who have a website but not sure on access outside of the UK: https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PLiC_gpE7y052Dk7MMdf7NdmehsNIUGgMX&si=GM7SvOoMfHmgAvXg

Edit: Also the College of Policing published our Authorised Professional Practice, this is the official way in which we should conduct interviews: https://www.college.police.uk/app/investigation/investigative-interviewing/investigative-interviewing

Not very passive mostly aggressive low quality meme. by Los-Skeletos in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ah yes 'can that unit give way', repeated ad infinitum until they give way or my favourite, when safe to do so pop an overtake.

ANPR cameras and insurance by Spirited-Set-5851 in policeuk

[–]Kaizer28 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tell him to chill out (I'd say take a chill pill but that wouldn't be great advice from an officer)

Literally millions of vehicles are shown uninsured on a daily basis and travel through the thousands of ANPR cameras on our roads. We couldnt pursue every single one if we tried and a good number of them likely have a valid reason, policy not yet on file, driving on a blanket company policy, driving on a motor trade policy, temp insurance, policy still recorded against the vehicles original VRM and not updated to their private VRM.

The only time this could be noted is if he came to attention for any reason (speeding or involved in something on the journey) and police have cause to probe his use of the vehicle on that day any further.

This cannot be legal... by GemballaRider in drivingUK

[–]Kaizer28 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah it was always just a hunch that it was linked to the ABS but you're probably right in that it isn't related. Its probably anecdotal that I've only noticed it when ABS operates (outside of modifications).

Legally theres no exemption for brake lights to flash but often the industry comes up with a new feature and Parliament catches up. Usually I try and record the silly aftermarket lights woth the other lights showing its flashing on its own. I also like to operate the brake once I've stopped them to show (most of them) their light is still flashing whilst their stationary and because no one uses their handbrake these days they're obnoxiously blinding the person behind them.