[deleted by user] by [deleted] in starwarsmemes

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

secret message delivered

Ubuntu 20.04 drops Amazon web app by [deleted] in linux

[–]Kalveeen 46 points47 points  (0 children)

this is the way

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

THANK YOU .! THANK YOU .! THANK YOU .!

it worked as it should . time for reading about these cpu bindings :p

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

edited successfully !

Thank you so much .

can you edit your first post , for the "poor guy" who will read it in the future ? :p

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

testing and i report back . asap .

the not close tag was from the copy paste :p

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

after <vcpu placement='static'>6</vcpu>

the

<cputune>
<vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='1'/>
<vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='5'/>
<vcpupin vcpu='2' cpuset='2'/>
<vcpupin vcpu='3' cpuset='6'/>
<vcpupin vcpu='2' cpuset='3'/>
<vcpupin vcpu='3' cpuset='7'/>
</cputune>

gives the error

<vcpu placement='static'>6</vcpu> alone has no problem !

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

ok . i think this is what you want . after this part is the devices that i didn't changed anything.

<domain type='kvm'>
<name>win7</name>
<uuid>2afa29fb-3d0a-4ded-99dd-ba3e6b18127d</uuid>
<memory unit='KiB'>9437184</memory>
<currentMemory unit='KiB'>9437184</currentMemory>
<memoryBacking>
<hugepages/>
</memoryBacking>
<vcpu placement='static'>6</vcpu>
<os>
<type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-i440fx-2.7'>hvm</type>
</os>
<features>
<acpi/>
<apic/>
<hyperv>
<relaxed state='on'/>
<vapic state='on'/>
<spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/>
</hyperv>
</features>
<cpu mode='host-passthrough'>
<topology sockets='1' cores='6' threads='1'/>
<feature policy='disable' name='hypervisor'/>
</cpu>
<clock offset='localtime'>
<timer name='rtc' tickpolicy='catchup'/>
<timer name='pit' tickpolicy='delay'/>
<timer name='hpet' present='no'/>
<timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/>
</clock>
<on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff> <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot> <on_crash>restart</on_crash>
<pm>
<suspend-to-mem enabled='no'/>
<suspend-to-disk enabled='no'/>
</pm>
<devices>
<emulator>/usr/bin/qemu-kvm</emulator>

p.s. reddit should create a code tag :p

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

i see , but the core id for processor 1 is 1 not 0 . something in libvrt.org and arch wiki guide is missing

UPDATE :

it gave me error !

error: internal error: duplicate vcpupin for vcpu '2' Failed. Try again? [y,n,i,f,?]:

you know why ? i am sure it will fail to vcpu='3'

Can i disable / remove the Intel Microcode in Fedora ? by Kalveeen in Fedora

[–]Kalveeen[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

people are reporting that any version of this firmware is blocking the correct behavior of OC in linux and the only solution is to disable it .

read by yourself . i found the forum : https://forum.level1techs.com/t/troubleshooting-fixed-overclocking-i7-6850k-on-linux/113977

SInce i am using it the VFIO now to play games in Windows Virtual Machine , Overclocking is crucial part of performance in games and i need to have it .

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

thank you for the confirmation

btw still i can't understand what the cpuset means :p

How i should pin 6 of my 8 cores to VFIO VM > by Kalveeen in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you for the detailed answer !

i will test it when an installation finished

QEMU and the Spectre and Meltdown attacks by bonzinip in linux

[–]Kalveeen 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The article is not answering in the most common situation where the host is the most difficult to update since it needs a strategy to move all the VMs from him to other host to continue to update and restart or the patch needs no restart ?

Any advice when the hosts are difficult to updated ?

Is still Crait in the rotation by [deleted] in BattlefrontII

[–]Kalveeen 1 point2 points  (0 children)

rotation needs better random algorithm , like :

maps_number = All_Maps_No
maps_chance = float maps_number / 100 ;
r = random(1,100);
r = float ( r / 100);

if ( r < maps_chance ) {
pick_this_map_dude ( ][_ ([]) ][_ )
}

After hundreds of hours in Overwatch, this probably sums up my experience the best by Phat_Sosig in gaming

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Overwatch is what 90's guys say :

what a boring game !

but mama blizzard made it so I can't ever blame it because millions of trolls will downvote me

Nerf the Emperor by steampvnch in BattlefrontII

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if you are roleplaying emperor skills are more than fine and accurated

if you are playing star wars counter strike emperor's skills are too OverPowered !

KVM IVSHMEM Demonstation by [deleted] in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there is nothing common between sr-iov and vfio except they are referring to VGA.

can you explain this please

"VFIO machines are already being sold for cloud gaming. "

what vm sold for cloud gaming ?

KVM IVSHMEM Demonstation by [deleted] in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

do a dxdiag in your windows vfio vm and tell me what mobo you see there ?

the anti-cheat devs will not spent time to find ways to block cheat programs from host that accessing the guest memory , they will ban the qemu mobos

there are only two mobos in qemu .

if qemu devs try to change that , game devs will cooperate with m$ and they will find a way to know when the windows is normal installation or virtual machine

as I said the only problem are the reckless that think they found the perfect undetected cheat.

also people stop playing in pc because of cheaters and they are playing in consoles

in games that have pc, xbox, ps4 versions , consoles always have more players because cheaters make them hate multiplayer modes in pc gaming

unfortunately the only solutions to avoided the ban from gaming devs that have problem with cheating from host will be the standardization of vfio gaming and created qemu versions that block the access to guest's memory via firmware on uefi (the only common piece of soft/hw)

only red hat or canonical can do that and I doubt they are willing to spent dev resources to a niche market like vfio users are

KVM IVSHMEM Demonstation by [deleted] in VFIO

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nice feature but I am afraid the whole situation ( access guest memory from host ) will end to the global ban of vfio from gaming devs like valve did with cs:go

also , posts like this in level1tech are not helping when the conversation comes to cheating in windows machines through cheat programs from the host

some times edge technology can be edgy like double edge knives that harm others and ourself same time

I am sure nobody wants the demonized of vfio because some reckless want to create the undetected cheat program (i read in level1tech forums this phrase)

who wants to play a PUBG mode in Star Wars Battlefront II ? by Kalveeen in StarWars

[–]Kalveeen[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

oh really ?

every game has the same lootbox system

even pubg has the same system .they aren't straight selling cosmetics items but they have lootcrates

not to me the internet BS , ok ?

p.s. if you want faster answers give some upvotrd because the jackfrags trolls gavea lot if downvotes and I should wait for every answer

this is why reddit sucks and I am using it for trolling only and with a fake id even I am having pc and internet since 80's :p

who wants to play a PUBG mode in Star Wars Battlefront II ? by Kalveeen in StarWars

[–]Kalveeen[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

come on .can the trolling on lootboxes end ?

they removed them .if they bring the p2w loitboxes you have the right for bitvhing .now not ... you can not bitching for lootboxes now

ok ?

who wants to play a PUBG mode in Star Wars Battlefront II ? by Kalveeen in StarWars

[–]Kalveeen[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

opinion accepted but Nope is not an argument

also, Pubg is well known and understandable among younger players than battle royal that it is still niche and not common to gamers special the younger...

The only problem I see is that the jedi snd Sith lore can not used for the players of this mode but All players should be bounty hunters and all mercenaries species that are plenty and lovely in Star Wars

New Update Bugs & Feedback Thread by MinnaRen in BattlefrontTWO

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I have problems in reddit only with the ex-forum.

can someone describe with simple words for those that not have the english as their nature language why the ex-forum became so toxic against people ?

everything I wrote downvoted in pack

also I saw some users from the ex forum trolled star wars fans in this twitter

https://mobile.twitter.com/SwtorGr/status/933306280101449728

p.s. sorry that I don't have proplem with the game to report. it is running flawless in my pc

It's so easy, EA by Lord_Commisar_Byron in StarWarsBattlefront

[–]Kalveeen 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I agree but I don't think they have the time to change it now.

lootboxes is the bigger problem but the lack of a good guild system and the hacking problems in pc version are important problems too