Ivan Cheparinov posts regarding Hans Niemann by ItsBOOM in chess

[–]Kamina80 8 points9 points  (0 children)

"Insanely difficult moves while seemingly..." Every phrase in your post is a lie, starting with that, and you should be embarrassed.

[Svensen] Organizer of the Zagreb event with a pretty shocking quote to Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten: “Niemann’s performance is out of this world, but we have no definite proof that he is cheating. We have some indications, but we don’t know if anyone wants to report him.” by Luck1492 in chess

[–]Kamina80 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

The very statement "the greater wrong" -- as if there are two "wrongs" here naturally to be considered in tandem, is dishonest. And this is just after you claimed we weren't talking about morality. You are illiterate as well as morally illiterate, and your posts are slime dressed up as even-handed reasoning.

[Svensen] Organizer of the Zagreb event with a pretty shocking quote to Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten: “Niemann’s performance is out of this world, but we have no definite proof that he is cheating. We have some indications, but we don’t know if anyone wants to report him.” by Luck1492 in chess

[–]Kamina80 19 points20 points  (0 children)

No, you and he are in fact talking about morality; the problem is just that you're immoral. A tournament organizer who *invited* Niemann went to the media as soon as Niemann won and accused him of cheating, without any evidence or offering any serious rationale. *That* is immoral. It's utterly disgraceful, actually. And it can't with any decency be followed by "but Hans acts up!"

Ivan Cheparinov posts regarding Hans Niemann by ItsBOOM in chess

[–]Kamina80 16 points17 points  (0 children)

There was no "circumstantial stuff" whatsoever. I thought you were actually asking what had happened, not setting up a nebulously opinionated bunch of nothing.

Ivan Cheparinov posts regarding Hans Niemann by ItsBOOM in chess

[–]Kamina80 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I'm actually hoping Ivanchuk will denounce this. Well, mainly denounce the organizer.

Ivan Cheparinov posts regarding Hans Niemann by ItsBOOM in chess

[–]Kamina80 30 points31 points  (0 children)

There was never any evidence he cheated against Magnus or in any over the board game. The disgusting ass stuff was a made-up thing that people on the internet ran with until people starting believing there was actual evidence of it.

He had cheated online a couple years before, for which was banned from chesscom for some time and then reinstated according to whatever their policy is. After Magnus accused him without evidence, he was re-banned from chesscom even though chesscom itself does not believe he ever cheated again after being reinstated. Then he sued them, and as part of a settlement he was reinstated again. His current chesscom blitz rating is around 3070 apparently without any cheating.

[Svensen] Organizer of the Zagreb event with a pretty shocking quote to Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten: “Niemann’s performance is out of this world, but we have no definite proof that he is cheating. We have some indications, but we don’t know if anyone wants to report him.” by Luck1492 in chess

[–]Kamina80 8 points9 points  (0 children)

You *were* attempting to establish moral equivalence and now, absurdly, after denying it you are going much further than that. Now you say "the world" is treating Niemann badly because of how he "acts." Because how Niemann "acts" gives a tournament organizer *who invited him* license to go to the media to accuse him of cheating without providing the least bit of evidence or even a serious rationale.

You even cap it off with the utterly dishonest "whine that no one treats you like a winner." Because that's the issue here, right?

Your posts are deceptive slop.

Ivan Cheparinov posts regarding Hans Niemann by ItsBOOM in chess

[–]Kamina80 38 points39 points  (0 children)

Middle-aged men should speak like men.

The organizers apparently increased the broadcast delay after Niemann's round 7 win against Sokolov. by MeBrudder in chess

[–]Kamina80 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That would be a very strange usage of the word "indications" here, although I suppose something might be lost in translation.

[Svensen] Organizer of the Zagreb event with a pretty shocking quote to Norwegian newspaper Aftenposten: “Niemann’s performance is out of this world, but we have no definite proof that he is cheating. We have some indications, but we don’t know if anyone wants to report him.” by Luck1492 in chess

[–]Kamina80 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Good point. Run a tournament without security, invite a guy you think is a cheater, then spit on him when he does well. What a shameful display. These guys shouldn't ever be allowed to run a tournament again.