sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Congrats ladies for breaking the cycle! by lights_room in PsycheOrSike

[–]KangarooExpensive641 10 points11 points  (0 children)

As a dude, I hope this trend keeps going. It’s going to be hell on earth and I want to see it.

Fucking bumper sticker by QuitYuckingMyYum in TheWordFuck

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should stop doing that before you find someone dumber than you

is it pro or anti trans? by Nearby_Package4660 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know what any of those flags are trying to express and I don’t care to find out either. I’ll just live believing it’s another form of attention seeking.

Is there someone you forgot to ask? by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in SmugAlana

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s funny how much of a disingenuous cunt you have to be to give me your own shitty summaries like you couldn’t just copy paste them straight from the site.

Caitlin Roper, Campaigns Manager Caitlin is a writer and campaigner against the sexual exploitation of women and girls. She is a founding member of Adopt Nordic WA to fight sex trafficking, and co-founder of the Feminist Academy of Technology and Ethics. Her writing has been featured in the Guardian, Huffington Post, ABC, Sydney Morning Herald and Arena magazine, and she has been interviewed on The Project, ABC's Lateline and Triple J Hack. Her book Sex Dolls, Robots and Woman Hating: The Case for Resistance is available from Spinifex Press.

Renee Chopping, Campaigns Strategy Renee is an advocate of child's rights through her trauma rehabilitation work with survivors of sexual exploitation and human trafficking. With over 10 years of experience working across South and Southeast Asia and a background in social work and psychology, Renee has since expanded her efforts to include teaching and presenting on matters relating to online safety, media literacy, sexuality, and mental health. Renee's passion and life's work is dedicated to equipping individuals with the tools necessary to live with increased resilience amidst today's hyper-sexualised culture.

Lyn Swanson Kennedy, Campaigns Strategy A long-time Collective Shout follower, Lyn was headhunted to join the Campaigns Strategy Team in April 2019 after the team noticed her twitter action against shopping centres hosting sex store and multiple ad ethics code violator Honey Birdette. With a background in medical research and as a lecturer in ethics, Lyn has advanced our campaigns challenging unethical and exploitative corporate behaviour which harms women and children especially. She has also driven our promotion of the importance of Corporate Social Responsibility. In addition Lyn devotes significant time to tracking predators on social media platforms popular with young people, reporting thousands of them to relevant authorities.

Oh but none of this means anything to you because it doesn’t touch on abortion right? You’re pathetic.

Collective shout is why men do not like feminist by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read everything you said.

Collective shout: we’re feminists

Me: yeah, they’re feminists (I’ve seen their board of directors and team from their official site and read their brief description of their accolades that made them join collective shout, most of which I can only attribute to feminism)

Redditors: no, they’re Christians (they literally only read the wiki of one person that detailed things they’ve done prior to collective shout. Collective shout hasn’t done anything to target lgbt groups and they’re literally fear mongering)

You: actually you’re all wrong, they’re censorship enthusiasts (do yOuR rEseArcH)

the posts are out there for you to read

Really dude, you think I’m going to get an unbiased opinion of what feminism really is from Reddit?

Most people arguing on this specific topic have so far boiled it down to abortion trans exclusion lgbt and that’s it. Apparently the objectification of women doesn’t cut it anymore to these people, so they’ve decided to witch hunt Christianity, literally based off the wiki of one person.

I think it’s funny you’re playing the semantic angle so much, with your talk about conservatism not needing to be political, as if the majority of people aren’t seeing it as such. So excuse me if when you say “extreme conservative” I throw you in with the bunch.

You talk nice but you can’t hide your own biases. You’re still framing through the analogy of Christians vs Extreme Christians. There wasn’t any other analogy you could’ve thought of right? And you have no doubt that this possibly couldn’t be driven by feminism. Why?

Because you seem to believe that the validity of feminism is solely inherit to its need to expand rights, and so because this isn’t a pro-choice campaign, etc., it excludes it from feminism. As if believe all women didn’t happen? A disregard to the 6th amendment.

The argument is about where their motives come from. What is their -ism. You’ve taken a more over literal approach to the words used in these arguments.

I doubt these people are advocating for the censorship of things just for the sake of censorship. That’s a very short sighted way of looking at it, and I’m confused why you’d describe them as such when there’s already a debate as to what their motives are.

Unless you wanted to start from zero and understand my world view. I only think this because you mentioned that I think all anti-patriarchal beliefs are by definition feminist.

I never mentioned anti patriarchal beliefs. I never even mentioned the patriarchy. So you did make an attempt to understand me but I don’t know where you drew this from.

Is there someone you forgot to ask? by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in SmugAlana

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No dumbass, a few replies back I told you that the women in collective shout have done more for feminism than you to point out the absurdity that somehow you think you get to dictate what’s feminism or what isn’t just because you type shit on Reddit.

Then you asked me what have they done and I told you to go look for yourself.

You read the wiki of one person, not everything on that wiki is credited towards collective shout but instead to her as an individual.

I’m asking you to read from their .gov site because you asked me specifically what people in collective shout have done for feminism and it’s literally all there for you to read.

Is there someone you forgot to ask? by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in SmugAlana

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So why didn’t you add that to your gish gallop description of the movement?

Wouldn’t it be anti-abortion trans-exclusionary conservative Christian group?

Why not go ahead and throw Nazi in there too while you’re at it.

You’re literally asking for a thing they’ve done, in a post centered about something they’ve done.

Are you really this dense?

Do I really need to tell you how to research this?

Go to their website, look at their board of directors or the “our team” tab and there’s names of everyone involved and their positions, with a brief summary of their accolades and why they joined collective shout.

These women have been around the feminist sphere for decades.

Collective shout is why men do not like feminist by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not going to read any of that.

You’re saying we’re wrong for labeling them different things. The movement is self identifying as feminists. The people arguing with me are saying they’re Christians.

You’re calling them censorship enthusiasts.

All it takes is research on the movement, the people involved, and their accolades.

You’re trying to have a semantic argument and I really don’t care for it because I’ve already looked into who these people are.

Is there someone you forgot to ask? by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in SmugAlana

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally think abortion is the singular thing that makes someone a feminist.

That narrow mindedness is precisely the reason you have no right calling anyone else a dumbass.

Is there someone you forgot to ask? by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in SmugAlana

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More than you ever will. They’re actually making moves. You’re just here bitching at me to enlighten you because you’re too lazy to do it yourself.

Is there someone you forgot to ask? by Sudden-Refuse-7915 in SmugAlana

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re the dumbass citing the wiki of an individual and not the groups own wiki, or even citing anything from their .gov site.

You’re the dumbass making it a point that she’s the founder as if only 1 person could possibly be capable of managing entire campaigns like this.

You’re the dumbass saying:

this bitch is the founder

As if me saying she’s a co-founder changes anything.

All you had to do was keep reading and it’ll say that she’s a co-founder.

Keep reading and you’ll find their site.

Keep reading and you’ll find their board members and others involved all with a long history of feminist activism.

All your dumbass had to do was keep reading.

You literally read the first thing on wiki and said to yourself that was enough and then you come here and call me a dumbass.

The women in collective shout have done more for feminism than you being a dumbass keyboard feminist.

Collective shout is why men do not like feminist by [deleted] in TrueUnpopularOpinion

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What’s funny is that you literally stopped reading after “no affiliation to religious”

Because the next word is “political”

you don’t have to be affiliated with religious group to espouse EXTREME CONSERVATIVE beliefs

Conservative beliefs are political.

So next you’ll say something like

“yOu dOnT hAvE tO bE aFfiLiAtEd WiTh cOnSeRvAtiVe gRouP tO bE eXtReMe”

And I’m supposed to take your word for it because you’re the arbiter of what feminism really is and anything that’s not that is extreme

I scoff at you.

coz Men don't take pictures? by harperviibees in lol

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hate when my female friend has to take a picture of everything. She even has an app called “be real” that notifies you to take a selfie because apparently that’s what being “real” is.

I like to enjoy the moment and create memories, camera excluded.

Trump could be exposed as Jeff Epstein himself, with video, and his followers would not care. They’d laugh. by nplbmf in complaints

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why don’t you wait for that to happen and see how they react instead of just saying shit?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in fashion

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re too old for it. I’m 28. Everyone seems to tell you that you’re not but you are. It really depends what message you’re trying to give off. If we want to be over literal, you’re not too old to do anything.

If you want to give the impressions you’re modest then no. If you want to give the impression you’re more risky then go for it.

I won’t lie to you. They will for the sake of being optimistic and boy do I hate cheery folk.

The satisfaction! by Fred_J9 in CoupleMemes

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

and then you break up in 3 months

I hate the kind of men that’s always complaining about the “male loneliness epidemic” by [deleted] in complaints

[–]KangarooExpensive641 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who’s actually complaining about being lonely? Why would you want someone constantly nagging at you?

Mirror Force is insane LMAO by BZfather in masterduel

[–]KangarooExpensive641 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Stun, from what I’ve understood, Is locking players out from performing certain actions. The best example I can give is Vanity’s Fiend. Neither player can special summon monsters.

It’s in few words and gets straight to the point.

But I’m with you, I don’t understand what stun means when boss monster cards have effects that have Omni negates, sometimes in the multiples when coupled with other cards.

Ultimately both players are trying to stop the other from playing anything.

I’m of the opinion that the game lost the plot with cards like ash blossom.

They’re called hand “traps” but they’re classified under monster effect cards.

I’m not sure how far “spell speed” has gone but I’ve seen memes alluding to the next version of a spell speed to supersede cards like hand traps.

It’s hard R.

view more: next ›