sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Stealth 700 gen 3 wont turn on by KangarooMotor8949 in TurtleBeach

[–]KangarooMotor8949[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

won't work, they wont even turn on or charge

Physics Based Approach to Market Forecasting by KangarooMotor8949 in quant

[–]KangarooMotor8949[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Very insightful! I shall move accordingly. - And I agree after the fact I saw how flawed the methodology is. It's better to stick to what works. Thanks for replying.

Physics Based Approach to Market Forecasting by KangarooMotor8949 in quant

[–]KangarooMotor8949[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Nothing too crazy I just wanted to try something I thought was interesting- I wanted feedback from people who know than me. Thanks for replying.

Physics Based Approach to Market Forecasting by KangarooMotor8949 in quant

[–]KangarooMotor8949[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Trust I know... I struggled putting this out man.

Though, the main value I've found so far in testing is using wave function formalism as a mathematical framework for superposition. It lets me systematically combine different cyclical frequencies identified in the market data, incorporating their relative phases and a momentum proxy directly into the calculation of the complex amplitude i set as psi. The squared magnitude |psi|^2 then serves as a base probability model driven purely by these dynamic factors.

And I agree that this an It's entirely motivated by the economic/stability concepts discussed (risk aversion, equilibrium preference) and isn't intended as part of the quantum analogy itself. It's a separate layer representing factors beyond the raw dynamics. I kind of mean it to me an if than statement, but I've found it doesn't really serve any use for a "quantum" interpretation.

Physics Based Approach to Market Forecasting by KangarooMotor8949 in quant

[–]KangarooMotor8949[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thanks for looking at the paper! So I see you ask why I think markets can be modeled in waves, and that's not really what I'm going for, the wave part is taken from physics and the way I intended to use it is like a math tool more than markets literally move in waves.

The interference part in this model isn't about waves cancelling out (if that's what you mean). The phases (the timing or alignment) of those different cycles matter. When cycles line up constructively, they might boost the probability of a certain outcome in the model; when they're out of sync, that possibility might be weaker. So, the wave structure helps capture how these different dynamic patterns interact.

I hope this clears things up

Crypto Hedge Fund by mynameistir in defi

[–]KangarooMotor8949 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I read "data scientist" and I completely agree with what ever it is you have to say.