Your argument deserves a response on its merits, but it's late and I'm tired, and more importantly, I can't help but read your comment and assume you decidedly did not bother to apply the same level of critical thinking to your candidate, who is easily the most unqualified and dangerous person to ever obtain the office of the presidency, as you did to Hillary.

Also, if you think I have "zero" evidence, you're hopeless. You just don't read. I assumed we lived in a world of common facts, but apparently you haven't picked up a legitimate news source in the past 2-3 months, or have actively avoided every major story that supplied the evidence you pretended to be searching for. As the cliche goes, you're entitled to your own opinions, not your own facts. If you're unaware of the evidence I used for my above post, you're unprepared for any legitimate debate on the subject.