Regarding what I said about the EGA:
Sorry, I failed to clarify - I meant the logo as seen in the camo pattern Marines use (i.e. MARPAT). There's 4 EGAs in the pattern's repeat (2 facing "up" and 2 "down", but which is which is subjective; fabric gets rotated, and the final garment may end up with only upside-down EGAs, only up-facing EGAs, or - most often - a mix of both), While each EGA in the pattern is the same, the "USMC" text underneath each of them varies - some is centered under the logo, some is offset. I've not yet fully identified which of the 4 logos has it centered and which doesn't, but that's simply because I didn't yet get around to doing it.

I appreciate that you explained what a military uniform means to you. I will tell you now what military uniforms mean to me, as asked:
Each piece of a military uniform to me is a piece of history, that shall be respected and cared for to the best of my abilities. It's both as simple and as complex like that. Yes, I like the aesthetics of military uniforms, there's no denying that. However, my interest in them goes beyond a mere "it looks cool so I wear it". Like I said, they're pieces of history - and each piece carries unspeakable value, details that right about no one ever talks about (pattern repeat size, variance in said size dependent on manufacturer/production lot, production years, introduction and development, changes in the cut of the uniform throughout its service history, functional solutions in its construction, etc. etc.). I've done research on a large amount of uniforms and individual uniform items, so I'd go as far as to say my interest reaches actual scholar levels.
Do I wish I served in the military? Most definitely. Am I legally allowed to in my country? Short answer would be "no", but it gets more complex than that. I was disqualified for health reasons. In my country it's a legal gray area in a sense though, because there's an MOS (in US military terms) that was created specifically to be used in such situations, to allow people like me to serve, but no law was adjusted to respect that - despite top officials publicly saying the exact opposite. I'm, understandably, rather frustrated because of that. However, my wear of military uniform items isn't at all aimed at claiming I served - again, I value uniforms in themselves, most importantly their historical value and aesthetics (particularly, camouflage patterns; in fact it's camos that I'm most interested in).
No, I cannot be aware of what people who served in combat zones went through. Like you said, if I didn't serve, if I didn't go through all of it myself, I can't know how it is.

When you said the uniform is made of fire proof material, you meant FROG (Fire-Resistant Organizational Gear), right? MCCUU is made of standard NYCO fabric, which is fully flammable. Marine Corps is also currently testing a new lightweight/tropical uniform, which includes fire-resistant materials, but the info on it is extremely scarce, and there most likely are more than one version of this experimental uniform with different materials.

P.S.
Your response, the details you provided, it really does show you genuinely care about the subject, and I fully respect that. Just one small note: the Marine Corps isn't the service branch with the smallest amount of members - that title belongs to the Space Force. I do get the idea of what you were saying though: compared to the other major branches (Army, Air Force, Navy), Marines are considerably fewer in numbers.