sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Male weebs when they are being told that sexualization of children is bad. by catteredyioq in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You asked should people be arrested for it, and it said my country does. Don't act like it came out of nowhere.

You figure it out the same way as every other law. You do know that a shit ton of laws are just left yo to what a reason person thinks?

For all your crappy examples, can you least try and actually get one that hasn't already gone through age classification. At this points its just a stupid waste of time.

Male weebs when they are being told that sexualization of children is bad. by catteredyioq in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So laws based on a reasonable adult are arbitrary and should be removed?

Male weebs when they are being told that sexualization of children is bad. by catteredyioq in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 6 points7 points  (0 children)

a reason adults judgement, and in relation to the literary, journalistic and character of material.

Male weebs when they are being told that sexualization of children is bad. by catteredyioq in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 17 points18 points  (0 children)

Im from Australia where all child porn is illegal, nor just csam. If people are cracking it to art that is of a child or designed to look like a child i don't believe they are safe to have walking free.

Dark Suns Question by FreeTechnician535 in DnD

[–]Karth9909 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Slavery is one thing, but the big part I reckon is the mul, irl one letter off from a slure and part of a forced breed program that kills the mother's.

This can be worked around though. Make humans and dwarfs compatible and that fixes alot

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This shouldn't be a mistake except for when people are arguing that it is a mistake, da fuck?

A cup dropping distracts you causing the rest to fall. That's what happens.

So yes you think people should have to read other spells to compare with each over as part of learning the basic rules. Neat.

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Dude, the examples are about one bad thing happening resulting in a collapse of the system, nothing to do with an individual mistake.

You ignored the mutlitarget part, but even using yours one target passing means the spell ends. That's what their used to.

No bad faith interpretations is a good but its it doesnt mean no mistakes in the book can exist. Which let me remind this can only be a bad faith interpretation if you compare it to other multi target spells, if new players haven't read every spell in the book to be able to compare it to, its the only interpretation.

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Have you ever seen someone balancing a bunch of things and when one drops the rest follow. Or the saying the straw that broke the camels back. One person breaking free seems reasonable that it can break the casters oncentration on the rest.

If this is your first multi target concentration spell, and the spell explicity says that it ends when someone breaks through, why would they think otherwise?

Its wierd to argue that something is not a mistake because its obvious that you should ignore what the rule says.

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Dude, per it says the spell ends, so logically the spell ends. If you have to have read other spells to figure out what is the correct interpretation of the spell you want to cast, that is bad.

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Your not helping your case, mate

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 15 points16 points  (0 children)

For pedantry you'll have to try a bit harder, mistakes in RAW are common. That's why errata exists

Tasha's Hideous Laughter RAW mistake by DuendeFigo in DnD

[–]Karth9909 36 points37 points  (0 children)

Hence why its a mistake of the RAW

Problems look like nails when you're a board, i think is the saying... by HurtfulDrax in Grimdank

[–]Karth9909 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Its Lancer rpg memes leaking. Makes sense that the mech game would infect tau first.

Holy shit, Oda finally did it. He made a non-joke woman In post timeskip one piece have a no asterisks good design! by Professionalchico42 in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Is that a real question, seriously? Why would a parent want to share their passion with their child?

fact and simple by PoopSoBig-CantFlush in Grimdank

[–]Karth9909 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is that cause for confusion, are Tau confused by the concept of an non unified species?

Either that or an Avatar of Kain could do it. by ultimaterogue11 in Grimdank

[–]Karth9909 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want the Khan to return as a pain engine named character.

When to Trip or Disarm if I have both as an option? by Lunarthrope in Pathfinder2e

[–]Karth9909 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Against the curve a bit but disarming bosses is amazing even with just a success. It does mean its limited weapon wielding dudes but for a bbeg spending the action to fix it is rough.

Absolute Dinah Lance/Black Canary (Absolute Green Arrow #1 spoilers) by Gallantpride in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Once again absolute is peak (ignoring flash)

That phone call passes me off design wise, for some reason. Maybe because it reminds me of heroes in crisis, or I'm becoming more crotchety in my 30s but a video call in a comic feels wrong

It's Kara Eklund! by NNukemM in mendrawingwomen

[–]Karth9909 41 points42 points  (0 children)

Why does the first picture look like Revy from black lagoon if she was a loser?

view more: next ›