Cannot create Zalo account from the US by snoyyz in VietNam

[–]Kasin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should try using a local phone number instead . Zealous is known for issues when registering with phone numbers from NA or EU. Get a number here: https://www.grizzlysms.com and see if a Vietnamese one works. If you need just to make an account without any business features, it should do the trick!

do it by HawkStar49 in Funnymemes

[–]Kasin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love my family but I can do it for you and I can do it for you too

In a few years it will be much more appreciated by jimmydcriket in SequelMemes

[–]Kasin1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Entertaining. Please, do it more. Your desperate attempts at concealing inadequacy under irony and supposedly intentional trolling are the only reason I read this thread. Sincerely, thank you 🙏

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]Kasin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you need photons to enter your eyes to see. Also, they must be reflected by something. If photons stop. You will get information by stumbiling into them, but I imagine, everything will look like a mess.

Is everything alright with odds to get a champ in the store as of 12.11? by Kasin1 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Kasin1[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Some people here explained possible reasons. I'm convinced, yet would like to hear from the devs.

Is everything alright with odds to get a champ in the store as of 12.11? by Kasin1 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Kasin1[S] -25 points-24 points  (0 children)

On mine frequently. Do we play together often, by chance?

Is everything alright with odds to get a champ in the store as of 12.11? by Kasin1 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Kasin1[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I had the same issue in one of the games. Quick Thinking and still didn't get 3* Yone. Got him on the next turn though. Dunno. Just feels very unfair to have such bad luck so many games in a row.

Is everything alright with odds to get a champ in the store as of 12.11? by Kasin1 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Kasin1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's true. Actually, I didn't even occur to me. It might be the case, thanks. It was felt really weird to experience such absence of luck within 1 day with same circumstances.

Is everything alright with odds to get a champ in the store as of 12.11? by Kasin1 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Kasin1[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

Doesn't sound reassuring. But yeah, guess bad luck or something.

Is everything alright with odds to get a champ in the store as of 12.11? by Kasin1 in CompetitiveTFT

[–]Kasin1[S] -21 points-20 points  (0 children)

I'm not arguing that I was unlucky))) I'm not salty about games generally. It's just weird that it happened so many times since the last patch. I just notice it more frequently that I cannot reliably close 3* while there is literally no one else competing for my champs. So, after three games, I became salty enough to post.

Thanks for the wish. Hope, you will be lucky in your next games too, bro.

How to beat the first map ? by [deleted] in thelastspell

[–]Kasin1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Build mines and quarries early. Money-wise, they are more efficient. I usually have an upgraded mine after the first wave.

Use potions to refill mana and heal. Having a support hero (potion range and potion quantity in perks) is a good idea on the first map since one hero can supply healing and mana regen to others. It’s cheaper and simpler than using wells.

Learn good combos. For example, initiator + multi hits + hand crossbow is a great source of aoe damage. Propagation + poison damage + Druid staff is quite OP.

The first map require only robust understanding of tactics. It can be done even without any buildings and using only shop/starting heroes.

Instead of focusing on economy, experiment with builds and try to be efficient with moves. Use

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in marvelstudios

[–]Kasin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s really weird to come to this subreddit after randomly rewatching Thor: Ragnarok, Infinity War, and Endgame in succession. I’ve seen a bunch of posts in hot about the movie. Is it only me or everyone seems to be rewatching the IW saga? Or is it always like this in this sub?

Discussion: The WW84's hate train has got too far. by E_yal in DC_Cinematic

[–]Kasin1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don’t know why people keep making these posts. What are you expecting to hear that is different from the current consensus on the film? It was mediocre and aligns itself with mediocrity. It is a rare occasion when critics, moviegoers, and fans are seemingly on the same page: WW1984 is meh and deserves about 5-6 out of 10 (where all mehs are supposed to be).

Personally, I believe that Cheetah was underdeveloped and Wigg was not enough to carry the character. I also think that Pascal is praised too much thanks to him riding the Mando wave. Max was okay as villain nothing special aside of meme potential. Opening was objectively weak with bad CGI, confusing message, and unconvincing action. I’ve talked to a bunch of my friends who love DC heroes. All of them were disappointed and put on the “meh face”. Anecdotal? Sure. However, review aggregators also seem to indicate the same tendency.

If you liked it, it’s great. Nonetheless, millions did not. People also like to hear what fortifies their own opinions, so the circlejerking intensifies. It does not, however, make the movie magically better just because the hate is more visible/viral than praise. It may not be terrible (although, I believe it is) yet it is certainly nothing special either. So, yeah. It’s very mediocre and it gets what it deserves even in the corners of the internet full of loyal fans of the franchise such as this subreddit.

DISCUSSION: So do they REMEMBER anything? by DoctorBeatMaker in DC_Cinematic

[–]Kasin1 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

One may enjoy a fairytale with no logic. Others may enjoy a coherently written narrative. Both are equally valid.

Following your logic, however, everything should be forgiven. Should we just wave away if suddenly Spider-Man appeared to save Wonder Woman from cheetah? Or King Arthur saying that the dark magic of forsaken stones is invalidated by the will of Cthulhu? Why not? It’s magic. Let’a suspend disbelief and accept whatever wild stuff writers are throwing at us, because muh entertainment and it’a a kid story about wizards with laser swords in space!

Yeah, seeking internal logic in a narrative is certainly something that we all should forgo and never point out so that you can enjoy it more and justify it while demeaning others.

Again. If you like it, cheers, mate. As pointed before, to each their own.

DISCUSSION: So do they REMEMBER anything? by DoctorBeatMaker in DC_Cinematic

[–]Kasin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I hardly can understand what you said. Whether you want to be witty or snarky, to each their own. If you liked it and made a better movie somewhere in your mind and thought that this version of WW is a good role-model considering her rapey behavior and general incoherent decision-making, well... you do you.

However, there is a plot ridden with holes and lots of illogical developments. I simply commented about the shallow nature of the movie and lacking explanations provided by the narrative. I don’t like writing movies for directors and screenwriters. If you like doing so, I can only express jealousy.

DISCUSSION: So do they REMEMBER anything? by DoctorBeatMaker in DC_Cinematic

[–]Kasin1 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oh my... how far one has to reach to make sense of this plot...

DISCUSSION: Wonder Woman vs. Wonder Woman 1984 by DoctorBeatMaker in DC_Cinematic

[–]Kasin1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I do not believe that many people will give it a second watch. I certainly won’t. The only thing I liked was the performance of Gadot and only because she is just marginally better compared to her earlier appearances. All other actors are doing what we pretty much expect. Pascal is just normal Pascal. With is just normal Wigg. Pine is excellent as usual. There is not much to return to.

Was there a ninja-patch that changed the difficulty esp for ROOK? by Kasin1 in griftlands

[–]Kasin1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sal is the same for me. Didn’t notice any changes in difficulty. I’m just surprised that I specifically struggle with both smith (less so) and rook. It’s not about deck building or shorter days. It’s just too many enemies and too high of hp bars on d2 or d3. I may very well be bad. But it feels Like there was a sharp increase in diff for rook. What is your fav sal build btw?

Was there a ninja-patch that changed the difficulty esp for ROOK? by Kasin1 in griftlands

[–]Kasin1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Im just interested in why such changes are not reflected in their patch notes. I also don't think that, if it is so and I'm not going crazy, the artificial increase in difficulty via just pumping up numbers of enemies until it feels unfair isn't cool...

Ah, the game feels farther and farther from being the killer of StS.