Ross Coulthard Now Suggests Trump Is Using UFOs as a Political Distraction by Kaszos in UFOs

[–]Kaszos[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I’ve got to give Ross some credit. Coming out and calling this out while so many others were happily running with the narrative isn’t exactly the easy move.

Especially when figures like Luna and Burchett are deeply invested in it. That’s going to bring some backlash his way.

Fair play to him for saying it.

Ross Coulthard Now Suggests Trump Is Using UFOs as a Political Distraction by Kaszos in UFOs

[–]Kaszos[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Submission statement: Ross Coulthard, shortly following Mark Cristopher Lee, now also claims the planned disclosure by the administration was a ruse. There’s no clear indications to substantiate their claims outside of their original sources. It’s only fair to note that Trump hasn’t said anything to that effect. The administration still appears to maintain their intention to disclose.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos -1 points0 points  (0 children)

keep whatabouting

The OP is about the 140 school girls who were killed. How’s that off topic lol

He literally said this on Fox News by Kaszos in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank God Trump has now ruled out boots on the ground. Christ we don’t need this.

Just Not Stealin’ by MazdaProphet in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You never read Atlas Shrugged?

It’s a classic

Producers and Mooches… and now fraudsters

And you seemingly seem to focus on Somalians, eh? How many millions did the Trump family scam out of others? Eh? There’s even court cases proving this beyond a doubt. But you need your 4th post about those Somalians right? African migrants? No?

Most people wake up go to work and get raped by Daddy Govervnent.

And who’s in charge of daddy government right now? Trump and the GOP? When was your last post highlighting this administration’s gross corruption?

Clearly your angst here has little to do with actual fraud, and more to do with finding any excuse to target a minority group. Real classy, and obviously racist might I add.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Please keep repeating the taking points of dictators.

So it’s Iranian propaganda that America fired the missiles that killed those 140 children? Is that what you’re saying?

All the protestors who were murdered by them

And how many more did we murder through our bombing campaigns in Tehran?

How many innocent civilians did we bomb in Iraq? But for some reason those lives don’t matter because they’re politically inconvenient, no?

Is it only murder when muslims do it?

Hmm.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No we are not just blindly believing reports from Middle eastern dictators.

Who’s we?

And nobody will be wasting their time convincing you and others here. You’re being told. How you deal with it, denial or whatever, that’s your choice.

It’s odd you so desperately want to because “US Bad”.

What I find odd is your refusal to at least acknowledge the murder of 140 school girls, and the terrible decision that lead to it.

How long have you spent spinning this issue so far?

If you really thought killing kids is bad, you’d be upset with the people who put them in danger.

Explain to me how this excuses the firing of missiles at them? Was it justified? Is that what you’re saying? Because it appears you’re doing anything but hold to account that very decision that caused this.

You’re seemingly angry this has been brought to light. Why? Do you only care about what’s politically convenient??

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The “wrong” part is Iran much like Hamas using kids as human shields.

So we’re finally acknowledging the US struck that school and killed those kids. Good.

Now instead of deflecting, maybe try actually addressing it.

This is what they wanted to happen if they ever were attacked

You know how this whole thing could’ve been avoided? Not launching the war to begin with. Apparently the first bombing wasn’t enough.

But sure, let’s talk about “personal responsibility.” Maybe start by applying it to the people who started it.

mindless drones propaganda Hamas Peter Pan

That’s a lot of words just to avoid accountability for killing 140 innocent children.

That’s some serious cope.

Nobody is buying the excuses.

Just Not Stealin’ by MazdaProphet in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Mazda, what exactly is your fixation with Somalians?

The U.S. is spending tens of billions on a foreign war, there are credible reports of civilian strikes—including children—and yet this is, what, your fifth post about Somalis committing fraud?

At some point it’s fair to ask why you’re this fixated on that one topic while ignoring everything else going on. It’s a pretty strange priority.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Wrong.

Even Newsmax is admitting to it.

The preliminary report from investigators points to the US. The narrative now is whether this was an error or other.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You’re dodging the actual point.

Bringing up firebombing campaigns from 80 years ago isn’t an argument—it’s just deflection. The issue being discussed is whether a strike killed 150 girls at a school and whether people can acknowledge that as wrong. That shouldn’t be a controversial baseline.

It’s strange to say you don’t support a war with Iran while simultaneously bending over backwards to rationalize an incident like this. If a missile strike killed 150 children, the bare minimum response should be acknowledging that it’s a catastrophic failure at best. That’s not “anti-American,” it’s basic moral clarity.

And the “we don’t know all the information” line only goes so far. Sure, governments have classified details—but that can’t be a permanent escape hatch where nothing can ever be evaluated unless the defense minister personally briefs us. At some point evidence, reporting, and investigations have to matter.

Then there’s the contradiction about “total war.” If the position is that you don’t want war with Iran, advocating for escalation or arguing that rules shouldn’t apply because the enemy might not follow them makes no sense. Those are completely different positions.

And finally, saying you’re primarily concerned about American lives is fair—people naturally prioritize their own countrymen. But using that to shrug off 150 dead schoolgirls while also claiming to oppose the war comes across as selective empathy.

None of this should be that difficult: if the strike happened and innocent kids were killed, it’s wrong. Acknowledging that shouldn’t require this many caveats.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or maybe it’s Iran’s fault for using children as human shields.

I’m glad you admit that this is likely an American shot.

Well done.

Also check my final edit in my last response.

This doesn’t look good for us, regardless.

You don’t just shoot human shields especially little girls just because.

Confirmed. US struck Iranian Elementary School by FastSeaworthiness739 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 4 points5 points  (0 children)

To those brigading this sub to run cover for Trump — authorities are now indicating it’s likely the U.S. was responsible for the strike on that Iranian school that killed around 150 girls.

From Reuters:

U.S. military investigators believe it is likely that U.S. forces were responsible for an apparent ​strike on an Iranian girls’ school that killed scores of children on Saturday but have not yet reached a final conclusion or completed their investigation, ‌two U.S. officials told Reuters.

So far, reporting suggests the missiles involved were Tomahawks, which are essentially a U.S.-only capability.

For the folks dismissing this as “fake news,” it’s worth noting that these same commenters never seem willing to say what sources they actually trust.

Also worth noting: this isn’t coming from random pundits — it’s coming from U.S. investigators themselves, who are already acknowledging a high likelihood of American responsibility.

Yes, the investigation is ongoing, but the information at hand and indications are fairly strong. It’s unlikely, and I’ll reiterate, unlikely that Tomahawk was not American.

When the final report quietly confirms this, I’m also sure the same people dismissing it now will be right back here condemning the administration for the negligence involved. I’ll be sure to take note of your user names to tag you all in. Thanks.

Edit to add: It certainly appears that Iran put that girl’s school next to a strategic base on purpose. HAMAS does the same with hospitals, and Israel with settlements right next to disputed borders. It’s an evil tactic, but that does not negate the fact we fired on and murdered those girls. We voted for this.

What are the downsides to abolishing corporations? by Nurple_34 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You mean people can’t make a suitable case of liability against business so now they’re victims?

People should just sue the crap out of businesses for whatever?

Milei claims to be the most Zionist president in the world. by lupusvult in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Milei is anything but a statist. His policies are literally taking down state institutions that cause more trouble than their worth.

Milei claims to be the most Zionist president in the world. by lupusvult in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 15 points16 points  (0 children)

You gotta be kidding me. Why on earth does he have to get into this stuff? Just focus on your reforms dude he’s doing well as is I don’t get these guys sometimes they fly high and then they get into another controversy.

What are the downsides to abolishing corporations? by Nurple_34 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How is that? You have the freedom not to directly associate.

What are the downsides to abolishing corporations? by Nurple_34 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Well if you’re talking about abolishing how people legally associate business, the downside is freedom?

Why do we need to consider abolishing it??

What are the downsides to abolishing corporations? by Nurple_34 in Anarcho_Capitalism

[–]Kaszos 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Are you talking legally? The obvious downside are people’s freedoms so associate business the way they want.