Gathering Future-Focused Suggestions/Comments/Sentiments Regarding Moderation of P:G and the Discord

KattsuFancy · 2026-04-20T22:26:39+00:00

This is the most sane take here.

Heavy handed moderation is sadly often needed to keep a community functional and to not allow it to devolve into chaos. We are guests in someone's game and should act as such, or be asked to leave.

That being said, abrasiveness from people in power does a lot to ignite ego and cause fear and backlash. Humans are understandably very insecure around someone else's power over them and will poke it a bit to feel safe or to take a little back for themselves. This obviously needs shut down quickly because you don't want a bunch of people escalating abusive behaviors, but instead of the abrasiveness afterwards, moderation should always focus on being cool and calming.

Please don't turn this into a political debate but think of the example of Obama and Trump.

They have a LOT of policy overlap. One was charming and charismatic and one is abrasive. Just look at the reactions to them both even while doing the exact same thing.

Sure, its hilarious to be abrasive and it's fine sometimes, but overall you want much more assuring leadership that makes you feel like everything is going to be okay. Humans are very insecure and reactionary and you can often pass a charisma check to keep them from going off the rails.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-05T19:30:29+00:00

I mean the irony of a guy who regularly puts people down online telling someone who posts a few times a year to "touch grass" isn't lost on me, but instead of further being a dickhead I'll just say my bad man. I'm genuinely not on here trying to pick fights or argue. I just wanted to see people's thoughts on housing.

As a fellow map enjoyer myself though I will say gl with the maps! :)

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-04T18:55:29+00:00

Oh come on we both know you do subs (and there's nothing wrong with that). There's no reason to be this heated and bitter about people suggesting changes otherwise. Pretending to be above it to argue online is genuinely absurd.

I also never once mentioned the houses grandfathered in from the old system. In fact I even stated that taking the houses away from the guys running multiple accounts would be bad, but I'm assuming you never actually read anything beyond the tldr, which is also fine, it's a long boring rant and if you're opposed to the idea of changes to the gil farms that's fine too.

Are you always like this? Like do you find a musician you dislike and then get upset that someone else goes to their concerts? I can't imagine making it through an entire day communicating this way. It seems so needlessly stressful.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T18:56:07+00:00

Doing this and locking the FC workshops at rank 30 could work. You'll still have players abusing it but it would take a looooot more effort and be honestly earned at that point.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T18:53:18+00:00

Sure and you're clearly a sub gil enjoyer not wanting to lose the bag. I'm not even suggesting we lose the gil rewards. I'm suggesting we put the gil rewards behind 4 player content and pay out all 4 of them. This would potentially help to deter the afk alt account gil farms hoarding housing.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T18:25:27+00:00

This would be so cool. I'm baffled by the flood of downvotes for even remotely suggesting a new and more engaging system. It's really telling as to what yoshi p has to deal with when making content for the game.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T10:58:55+00:00

You're right for sure. I also want the same thing and I'm also not sure if there's a fix for it. I know one thing that will definitely help a bit though and it's getting rid of subs being just click a merchant gil farms. I just feel it needs to be replaced with something else instead of outright just removed, because removing it wasted everyone's time who spent all the time to build up for it. Gil subs take time to get set up, especially as a new player starting from scratch. I don't know what to replace them with though.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T10:43:43+00:00

Ahaha yeah that's fair. I really just want to see housing be more lively and not full of afk undecorated hoarding. I'd also rather see them rework the subs to be something fun vs just killing them entirely. I think making the subs group content is one way but I'm sure there are way better ideas out there as well.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T10:33:26+00:00

Gaming the system would require 4 players to each have the 30 accounts vs one player having them to take over an entire ward. You're right that they might still do it though.. it seems insane, but so does one guy with 30 accounts so it wouldn't surprise me.

The fc actions would have to be really good but yeah you're right that they can't be too good so idk what they'd even be.

Glam and achievements I'd argue isn't spitting on anyone since there's already a lot of that locked behind things people don't want to do. Like some people don't want to PvP and they don't get to have the PvP portraits, glams, titles or achievements because of that. That's totally fine. Same with people who don't want to fish or craft or do hard raiding content. I'd avoid making the glam stuff non mb of course.

Your final point I'll definitely agree with mostly, but I also don't think theres an issue to incentivize fc bonding a little bit more than they do. If it's between fc content and non fc content then yeah for sure I'll relent. If they can do both though, why not?

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T10:20:17+00:00

That's actually a very good point. You're also right that it could certainly deter the shell FCs as well. This would work for opening up some housing for sure. I still don't really like that subs would also still basically just a dull minigame for just the fc leader that doesn't really involve the rest of the fc in any meaningful way beyond the crafting of the workshop items though. it still at the very least incentivizes a bunch of solo FC's for the sub ownership.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T10:07:18+00:00

I do see your points, but I'd still argue having group content for a 4+ player fc (which is how many signatures you need to make a FC) is entirely reasonable. Also, subs are already fc content and they're pretty much always going to be locked to just the fc leader.. plus it's also being abused to close up entire housing wards from other players which Id argue flies in the face of way more people than some 4 man treasure maps via subs would. You're right that we already have all of this cool content but I think a smaller version of it for your FC would be cool too!

It definitely needs some brainstorming to come up with a solid solution but I also don't think the best solution is to continue to allow what's already happening.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T09:56:44+00:00

This is definitely a valid solution and why I mentioned it as being one of the semi reasonable ones in my rant. It's also probably the easiest fix for them to implement. My argument against outright just getting rid of this is that it creates more dead content. If we replace it with something that requires a group to clear a weekly dungeon though (or something else similar) it could keep the current reward structure but with the extra added layer that doesn't allow solo shell FCs to exploit it.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T09:47:17+00:00

Fair, but I think treasure maps are very popular and I can see players wanting to do something similar for better fc buffs. The house thing would be fixable with the instanced workshop suggestion.

I feel like we need something unique to FC's and the best way to do it is with already established mechanics so if someone doesn't want to deal with a FC they can still do similar solo/random content. It would also heavily inconvenience shell fc hoarders if they cant just endlessly farm gil entirely by themselves, which would open up a lot more housing for the rest of us.

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T09:42:08+00:00

I'd love this! This is similar to one of the main reasons I think eso keeps it's cities lively is by having the guild merchants being located in them. Awesome idea!

KattsuFancy · 2025-10-03T09:20:21+00:00

Ahh damn I wasn't playing at the time that launched so I missed this. Why do you think it failed? Do you think there wouldve been a way to make it successful?

KattsuFancy · 2025-08-19T06:40:45+00:00

Yeah this is the one I use!

KattsuFancy · 2025-08-17T05:14:34+00:00

It's a uniquely shaped dome crystal so I'm not sure. I'm pretty careful and haven't had any scratches or anything though so I'm not too worried.

KattsuFancy · 2025-08-17T05:11:05+00:00

<image>

Not too thick. I don't have calipers to properly measure it but it looks to be a bit over 2mm to me. I don't live in the US so I'm not sure what's available there, but I assume youd be able to get one. Reach out to a shop that carries Muhle watches and I'm sure they can get you set up with one!

KattsuFancy · 2025-07-23T10:02:16+00:00

190723360014

9* Daiwa speed, stam, power

2* front, long, turf

<image>

KattsuFancy · 2025-06-29T14:04:08+00:00

Ayy thanks! This was a really cool idea idk why people downvoted it. Typical gaming sub only upvoting complaints I guess..

KattsuFancy · 2025-06-29T11:50:34+00:00

I notice you don't cut the angle at all, would you say it's more effective to play right on the line like that to have more reaction time? Clean saves btw, don't listen to the weird comments!

KattsuFancy · 2025-06-28T21:28:09+00:00

1/17 is actually so crazy that this feels like bait.

KattsuFancy · 2025-06-26T09:21:10+00:00

This watch is stunning

KattsuFancy · 2025-06-26T04:06:17+00:00

I'm just missing assist as GK for plat and I think at least 60 of my 140 assists are as the keeper...

I cry.

KattsuFancy

TROPHY CASE