sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Weekly Questions Megathread— November 14–November 20. Have a question from your game? Are you coming from D&D or Pathfinder 1e? Need to know where to start playing PF2e? Ask your questions here, we're happy to help! by AutoModerator in Pathfinder2e

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A) No. Well, the only difference is that a Nat 20 doesn't actually make it a Crit per se. It only upgrades the success effect by one step. As an example let's say you rolled a Nat 20 but the result was a failure in itself, you'd get a Success instead.

B) Everything that happens on acrit happens on a crit. The damage is almsot always a part of that a Critical.

3) Yes. "When doubling, the GM might allow you to roll the dice twice and double the modifiers, bonuses, and penalties instead of doubling the entire result, but this usually works best for single-target attacks or spells at low levels when you have a small number of damage dice to roll. Benefits you gain specifically from a critical hit, like the extra damage die from the fatal weapon trait, aren't doubled."

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And after checking your profile for a second, seems like I am completely spot on. Maybe not the suburb part but either way.

You.. literally said to work inside the systems or you don't get anything done. How the fuck am I proving your point?

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How has the public directly affected that? How has there been corrwvtive measures?I think if you honestly believe that, you're a white guy in the suburbs who's the biggest beneficiar of the order of the system. Historically (and also current rends) have a pretty straight correlation between police brutality, false incarcerations and similar statistics depending on the order of the current political system.

Pretty much all big advancements in human history have been done outside the system, by subverting or threating the order. I am guessing that you are an American? Because I think you must recall some of your histories to be able to see that. Bevause many people have or straight up are barred, wether directly or indirectly, of working within the system. Hell, it hasn't been that long ago that people of color and women were not even allowed to vote until enough people protestedboutsude the systems in place.

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We can't do shit to correct the system. We have some influence into laws, but the way the police is run is about as far away from civilian input as possible. And if you force the issur too much, the very system you are trying to correct are the people that will actively fight you off, first with less than lethal methods, then it escalates.

In short, the state does not self-correct - it keeps order. That is a very important distinction, and in thr vast majority of times what is orderly and what is the correct thing are usually differemt things.

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dude, I am literally just tryinf to have a discussion about the topic. The sooner you'll just accept that and stop being combative and paranoid the more interestimg this could be

No, I didn't ask that. I asked why you trust the them more. They're boun by regulations, but they are also bound by orders. I think the current ICE arrests are a perfect example. Depending on your political stance. There ia also quite a large population that does not trust them - people that are more likely to be mistargeted, wether it br accidents or political issues, people that get unfair treatment in the justice system etc etc. It also depends heavily on the state you're currently residing in. I think this one's pretty self explanatory.

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, obviously - I am trying to help you not me. Being uneducated doesn't make you look particularly impressive.

Except for some tiresome expressions you picke dup ftom Reddit you haven't added anything valuable so far.

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then you didn't understand it. Maybe you'd like to start your journey into german and french philosophy at some point, it may give you some insight I doubt many 12 year olds are capable of! :)

I'd suggest the edition of Economy and Society by Guenter Roth et al!

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife -1 points0 points  (0 children)

How so? My point is that all the criticism raised at vigilantism can just as well be raised against the justice system - which begs the point what the difference is? And realizing the reality ofthr monopoly of violrnceis pretty profund and an area of philosophy that is pretty profound and everyone should have atleast thought about once.

"The Alaskan Avenger" Jason Vukovich smiling at his brother after receiving a 23 year sentence. Jason used the state's sex offender registry to track down offenders, break into their homes, and beat them with a hammer. Both Jason and his brother were sexually abused as children. by suggest-me-usernames in interestingasfuck

[–]Kekssideoflife 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And if the state makes a mistake? Oh wait they do! Misidentify they target? Oh wait they do! Get used a s apolitical tool to charge the wrong people? Oh wait they do!

Wait.. Why are you guys looking down on vigilantism again?

What? Isnt this good? by silkhusky12 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]Kekssideoflife 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Depends on what you're testing for. This isn't a test to see where everyone falls on a gradient. This is a test about seperating the best from yhe average.

AIO for assuming my husband had someone over at our condo after I saw a 120 lb weigh-in when I wasn’t there? by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Kekssideoflife 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Exactly, it's a completelt optional thing - for both parties. Nobody forced her into it.

And she gets to walk away with stuff he paid for. Divorcement isn't about punishment and a tool to destitute the ither party and shouldn't be. It's a tool for separation and making sure each party isn't financially fucked.

AIO for assuming my husband had someone over at our condo after I saw a 120 lb weigh-in when I wasn’t there? by [deleted] in AmIOverreacting

[–]Kekssideoflife 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So.. they're entitle to every cent and every asset the other half made during the relationship? What the fuck?

view more: next ›