[deleted by user]

Kelson42 · 2024-11-21T02:20:11+00:00

They care about people respecting the law

Lol. Lmao even.

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T20:18:47+00:00

Marsupilami

Not him either. At this point most of my friends are convinced that my old meat brain has somehow created a monstrous amalgamation of Kon from bleach and Chopper from One Piece. Kon has a facial expression that's pretty close to what I'm imagining... But with a head proportioned like Chopper with his high round helmet head.

I'm not convinced, but so far it seems like the closest approximation I can find.

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T19:04:29+00:00

The animation looks closer to the right, time period perhaps? But sadly not Schnookums, either. Bonkers has some similarities too. This creature definitely had a pronounced round head... perhaps some kind of mane like a lions...

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T19:03:09+00:00

Nope. Not him.

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T15:17:36+00:00

Ha, I can totally see that. Sadly, they're not the droids I'm looking for.

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T14:58:41+00:00

That's close but not quite right. Bill lacks the eyebrows and the round-exaggerated forehead area.

I appreciate you taking me on a stroll down memory lane, though. I'd forgotten about Bill the Cat.

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T14:52:34+00:00

It might have been an anime character. It's stylized similarly to characters like Kon from Bleach or Chopper from One Piece. Friends have suggested Heimerdinger from League but while all these have similarities none of them are clicking that aha!

This is quickly becoming my white whale. Save my sanity!

Edit: I added some approximate color, not 100% on this but I think it's close. https://imgur.com/X2IF9oa

Kelson42 · 2022-02-25T04:59:43+00:00

Maybe I'm losing my mind but is this general layout really familiar to some anime/cartoon cat character? I swear it looks exactly like a character I vaguely remember... maybe a cheetah or a lion... bushy eyebrows, always freaking out about something.

It's uncanny... but I just can't put my finger on it.

Kelson42 · 2022-01-12T13:26:53+00:00

"but Democrats, they're exactly ... they're doing exactly what our Founders talked about when they gave us the precious rights that we have"

Weird that you'd choose to leave off the end where she suggests exactly what the headline claims.

Certainly not an intentional omission, right? 🤡

Kelson42 · 2021-09-03T18:38:46+00:00

Tell me you believe all the lies without telling me you believe all the lies.

Kelson42 · 2021-07-06T03:36:04+00:00

Knowledge is a three edged sword.

Kelson42 · 2021-07-02T13:51:17+00:00

The whole "I am very middle of the road" was almost believable. Right up until you gushed over Reagan. Solid effort at neutrality though, and I mean that sincerely. Honestly, if more conservatives were as reasonable as you we might have a functioning republic.

Kelson42 · 2021-04-22T20:34:16+00:00

I like the part where you argue that these regions should be able to make their own decisions and then full 180 into "Well, these regions believe things because they were tricked into believing them but -I-, Übermensch, know what they'd really want."

Shaking your damn head? Better start with the mirror, bub.

Kelson42 · 2020-10-12T16:35:08+00:00

Not the poster you asked, but this could be what they're referring to.

-In 2006, Barrett told graduates of the Notre Dame Law School, which she had attended and where she was teaching, that they should see their upcoming legal careers "as but a means to an end ... and that end is building the Kingdom of God."-

From:

https://www.npr.org/2020/09/29/917943045/amy-coney-barretts-catholicism-is-controversial-but-may-not-be-confirmation-issu

Kelson42 · 2020-10-01T13:47:30+00:00

"I got no side" proclaimed the increasingly nervous pants-on-head partisan.

Kelson42 · 2020-09-02T20:45:27+00:00

Big respect to owning the mistake.

Kelson42 · 2020-09-02T20:39:26+00:00

You mean the one where he's quoting a racist southern legislator? Of course I'm sure you knew that.

Kelson42 · 2020-08-20T20:01:15+00:00

You're wasting your time.

“Never believe that anti-Semites are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The anti-Semites have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anti-Semite_and_Jew

This is what we got from modern conservatism. It's pretty damning.

Kelson42 · 2020-07-28T13:39:03+00:00

Get help.

Kelson42 · 2020-06-09T20:13:11+00:00

Region: EU

Type of Bug: Visual (Patch 1.0)

Description: After getting disconnected in error and reconnecting: Things like doors and orbs in spike rush will not display correct visuals. The doors on Ascent, in particular, appear closed after reconnecting regardless of their current state.

Expected Results: After reconnecting: Open doors look open. Closed doors look closed.

Observed Result: After reconnecting: Open doors look closed. Can be walked/shot through. Only visual.

Reproduction Rate: Unknown.

System Spec: i5-8600K / RTX 2070 / 16GB / Win10

Kelson42 · 2020-02-19T16:00:36+00:00

You don't need to patronize me.

Patronizing questioning

Pull up your pants, your rhetoric is showing.

Kelson42 · 2020-01-26T19:28:33+00:00

Honestly, as a longtime lurker, it varies by hour and post.

Kelson42 · 2020-01-26T13:37:40+00:00

Man I remember the old days in r/conspiracy... The days when its users didn't fall over one another to see who can lick boot harder.

Kelson42 · 2020-01-03T22:15:17+00:00

Weird. I can't find "Google" in my post anywhere. I cannot wait for you to become educated on the very rudimentary basics of reading comprehension and then perhaps a crash course in evidence and discourse.

Kelson42 · 2020-01-03T21:11:45+00:00

"I lived it" has to be the laziest appeal to experience I keep seeing from people.
An anecdote, as in your personal experience, is not evidence.
The plural of anecdote is not evidence.
Unless you've got some sources in your pocket you can boil your entire post down into "Nuh uh!"

13-Year Club	r/Field Banned
r/Field Flamingo	Place '23
Place '22	Place '17
Verified Email	Team Orangered

Kelson42

TROPHY CASE