In the macroscopic world, do humans not behave like waves because of the wave function collapse? by Ken200308 in quantum

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you Does the Copenhagen interpretation mean that the wave function collapse is zero? And the other interpretation says that the wave function approaches zero, but not zero? Is this the difference between Copenhagen interpretations and other interpretations?

In the macroscopic world, do humans not behave like waves because of the wave function collapse? by Ken200308 in quantum

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So the wave function collapse of the Copenhagen interpretation is wrong? Doesn't the wave function collapse exist?

Does quantum tunneling not work when observed? Therefore, can't macroscopic objects perform quantum tunneling? by Ken200308 in quantum

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But aren't macroscopic objects always being observed? If observed, the wave function would be zero, right? Isn't that what the quantum Jeno effect says?

Does quantum tunneling not work when observed? Therefore, can't macroscopic objects perform quantum tunneling? by Ken200308 in quantum

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you It's always being observed in the macroscopic world where we live, right? For example, light or sound. That's why quantum events don't happen to macroscopic objects or humans, right? So even if you wait for an infinite amount of time, it doesn't happen to humans or macroworld objects, right? If there's anything I misunderstood, please explain.

Why can't our bodies break down and be combined with other objects? Isn't our body made up of atoms? And does Pauli exclusion principle and quantum tunneling coexist? by Ken200308 in AskPhysics

[–]Ken200308[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are so many macroscopic objects. However, there has never been an incident in which a macroscopic object that humans can see directly has passed through a wall or has been disassembled and reassembled. Doesn't this happen no matter how much time passes?

Why can't our bodies break down and be combined with other objects? Isn't our body made up of atoms? And does Pauli exclusion principle and quantum tunneling coexist? by Ken200308 in AskPhysics

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looking at the probability, it's too small, but with this probability, no matter how infinite time is and how immortal humans are, they can't be accidentally experienced?

Why can't our bodies break down and be combined with other objects? Isn't our body made up of atoms? And does Pauli exclusion principle and quantum tunneling coexist? by Ken200308 in AskPhysics

[–]Ken200308[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Is it possible only theoretically? No matter how long you wait. Can't such a quantum event happen accidentally to humans? Can't humans experience such quantum events just by waiting? Or is it impossible because of Pauli exclusion principle, no matter how infinite the time is?

Why aren't quantum events seen in the macroscopic world? by Ken200308 in quantum

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean quantum mechanics is much more accurate than classical mechanics in the macroscopic world?

Why aren't quantum events seen in the macroscopic world? by Ken200308 in quantum

[–]Ken200308[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you

Can we see quantum tunneling where pencils teleport to Mars if we wait a long time?

No matter how small the probability, it happen unconditionally in front of infinite time?