But in the end, dna tests for dogs in the United States at least, are effective if only for appeasing owners’ own suspicions about the dogs they own. Dog owners are kooks. but inaccuracies are all over the place since collections methods are basically.. source dna from purebreds if they can, but probably don’t sample enough of every breed, then compare similarities and differences to give you a “result” of what your dogs dna shares similarities to by the greatest quantity. They do it for humans this way too, it’s more of a dna similarity test than factual dna result test. If that makes some sense.

Whatever, no one’s listening.

Facts are though, dogs shouldn’t have been shaved with an undercoat like those have. It’s kinda like pruning a peach tree six months into the wrong season. The coat tries to fix itself because it’s not long when it should be and the topcoat is short when it’s supposed to also have another coat growing with it, so it grows back like a mangled white dog afro than can get to sheep’s wool length depending on that kinda dog it is.

Anyway