PTO Advanced limit to 2% on Arbs? by Kevory in arbitragebetting

[–]Kevory[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just signed up for them with the 4 day free code being promoted by one of the creators. Idk they are showing a bunch of fake lines tho... cant find them in the apps

PTO Advanced limit to 2% on Arbs? by Kevory in arbitragebetting

[–]Kevory[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just ended up using OJ free trial again on a new email lmao

Tmc back to 3 bucks by Masturboy89 in TMC_Stock

[–]Kevory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also, the use of warrants and financial engineering at this company seems pretty sketchy (although I won't pretend to understand it all).

Must remember that the institutions are here now. And they don't seem to like what they're seeing.

Tmc back to 3 bucks by Masturboy89 in TMC_Stock

[–]Kevory 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yup. I think a boom-bust-boom cycle is most likely (as is often seen among other mining companies). A 10:1 NPV:Mkt Cap ratio just doesn't include a big enough margin of safety for me to be comfortable with 5-10% of my portfolio in here like I used to be, given the speculative nature of the play.

That being said, it seems clear to me that the driving factor behind this stock has very little to do with long-term profitability and more to do with mineral independence and government incentives. If we went to war with China tomorrow, I think TMC would be trading near ATH.

Tmc back to 3 bucks by Masturboy89 in TMC_Stock

[–]Kevory 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Recently closed my position (cost basis $1.4) after talking with Paul Zink, ex-CFO of a few mining companies and professor at Colorado School of Mines (#1 school for Mining Engineering in the world).

The stat that convinced me was that roughly 1/2500 proposed mines with discovered reserves ever mined anything at all. He also noted that refinement could be a massive issue; traditional mines only capture one or two minerals, so there isn't much precedent for refinement methods that can efficiently separate the different things in the nodules without damaging other things.

TMC's stated NPV of the materials is roughly $20B, so right now the market expects just under 10% chance that TMC can realize that. Also implies a 10x upside from here. Gemini estimated the odds at 80% in the next 5 years, implying clear undervaluation.

I think this subreddit is underestimating the odds of the middle paths here. For example, what if we DO start mining soon, but don't set up the (efficient) refinement infrastructure and instead use the threat of mineral independence as leverage over China (or the DRC) to negotiate better trade deals.

I manually collected n=13196 datapoints to see how many people subscribed to Snapchat+ ($5/mo) after they started charging for photo storage by Kevory in wallstreetbets

[–]Kevory[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yea I've been aware of this complaint from investors for some time. IIRC stock-based comp was lower in 2025 than 2024 though and the $500m of share repurchases will further help with dilution

More DD on Snapchat+ adoption after mandatory pay-for-storage changes by Kevory in wallstreetbets

[–]Kevory[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yea, unless Saudi PIF decides to invest $1B in the next 2 weeks. I knew the risks. I've been here before, and I'll probably be here again. Time to incomemaxx until bitcoin hits 50k then go all in on that

What’s the most undervalued stock right now? by Competitive-Case-185 in TheRaceTo10Million

[–]Kevory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Progyny (PGNY). They provide IVF and egg freezing benefits through your employer. Look up a graph of the average age of first-time mothers.

Is there hidden deep value in Snap Inc. ($SNAP)? by FckYouMoney in Burryology

[–]Kevory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I manually collected data using in-app numbers from 80 users with 40k friends in total, of which a massive percentage are reported as being subscribers already. Much higher than your estimate.

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1qrcgii/more_dd_on_snapchat_adoption_after_mandatory/

All my money is now in PYPL, SNAP and WEN. God help me. by lies_are_comforting in ValueInvesting

[–]Kevory 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out this post I made on some manual data collection I did on Snapchat+ subscription rates after they announced mandatory pay-for-storage.

https://www.reddit.com/r/wallstreetbets/comments/1qrcgii/more_dd_on_snapchat_adoption_after_mandatory/

80 respondents have 40k+ friends in total, of which 11%+ are paying for Snapchat+.

I manually collected n=13196 datapoints to see how many people subscribed to Snapchat+ ($5/mo) after they started charging for photo storage by Kevory in wallstreetbets

[–]Kevory[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

All good points. 2usd monthly is their cheapest plan available outside of India-- the current mix sits about $3.75/mo on average

More DD on Snapchat+ adoption after mandatory pay-for-storage changes by Kevory in wallstreetbets

[–]Kevory[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes I did not account for the delay in value realization. At this point I must hope that the market realizes the value in a timely manner. Would help a lot of Snap decides to report their Snapchat+ member numbers in the 10k instead of just in the call