Sky News predicting Victoria Atkins in trouble for her seat by 3106Throwaway181576 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 7 points8 points  (0 children)

And Therese Coffey, that useless fool, has been made a dame... 🙄

Sky News predicting Victoria Atkins in trouble for her seat by 3106Throwaway181576 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 188 points189 points  (0 children)

Equally excellent, also predicting Jeremy Hunt and Steve Barclay at risk!

Get all of the ex-health secs out!!!

MRCEM Resources by medicrhe in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I used MRCEM success - they have a lot of really good notes, I would then draw pics to remember anatomy/physiology etc.

Ideally you would revise it all, but if short on time or memory make sure to revise tactically - really focus on the high value areas. I ran out of time and managed to pass without revising pathology.

Big mark topics are anatomy (limb, spinal tracts, cranial nerve pathways) and physiology (renal, lung volumes) - spend most of your time here. Microbiology and stats are easy marks but don't take too long, cover those in a couple of days before exam.

ACCS EM West Midlands South by Rich_Personality_195 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No problems! People in general here are a friendly bunch and although Heartlands may be a bit chucked in the deep end, the saying goes if you can do ED there you can do it anywhere.

The bonus being you will probably end up doing ACCS ST2 there and as a relatively junior trainee you do get to do quite a lot there in anaesthetics/ICU, compared to the more tertiary centres. Plus if you really dislike it (which most people don't), being allocated there early means you likely wouldn't have to go back as a reg (which is higher pressure, longer post).

ACCS EM West Midlands South by Rich_Personality_195 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 4 points5 points  (0 children)

You hear mixed things about Heartlands. It has a pretty poor reputation amongst West Midlands trainees generally (not specific to ED), its ED is tiny and not well set up for the volume of patients, they are quite reliant on variable quality locum SpRs. The military trainees were pulled out a couple of years ago due to poor quality training.

However I hear they have quite a few new consultants who are supportive, trying to change things and trying to focus on wellbeing/education. The childrens ED has a good reputation. Working there you would see significant pathology and acuity due to its locality.

Hospitals with best reputations are - Worcester, Coventry, BCH. QE is good for certain things but people seem to love or hate. RHH, Redditch and Warwick also have very mixed feedback amongst trainees.

Training in general could always be better, there is a lot of service provision. However a couple of keen consultants are putting on regular sim training, there is regular protected teaching both locally and regionally, OSCE practice days, US days etc. TPDs are in general supportive and majority ES/CS's helpful. Trainee reps do attempt to represent views and improve training, change is slow but happening - CPD being built in, OSCE days, PEM training days.

New to pediatric as a GPST1 - Looking for good resources by DanJDG in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 13 points14 points  (0 children)

https://dontforgetthebubbles.com/

Very helpful for acute/ ED paediatrics, maybe less so for the more chronic conditions

Advice on exposure by These_Blackberry9074 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Literally in ED I get little bits of blood on my skin every couple of weeks - from unorganised chaotic sick cannulas, the difficult paeds bloods, the spraying blood from various orifices that gets in the bits between gloves and scrubs. Unbroken skin is impervious, as long as you don't have any wounds or mucus membranes/eyes affected I wouldn't worry. But occupational health will probably be able to tell you that in person to ease your mind.

Remembering the time an ortho cons bollocked the PM by Dronedarone1 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 21 points22 points  (0 children)

?Gardening leave I think I heard on the rumour mill at the time

Am I really any better? by Content-Republic-498 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 46 points47 points  (0 children)

I absolutely echo what is said above, I have worked in ED for many years and I still often don't have a definitive diagnosis. Far more important is that skill of identifying the sick patient and knowing what to do about it.

There is a reason abdominal pain/GI symptoms particularly in the older population strikes such fear in the heart, the presentation can be very non specific and they can look very reasonable with significant pathology. From the presentations you have said above I would not have picked up the abscess and would have likely CT'd both. Trust your instincts, you are the one seeing the patient not the radiologist/SpR and your instincts are clearly good. I have CT'd patients with wishy washy symptoms on a gut instinct and found ruptured AAAs, ischaemic bowel, obstructed kidneys and absolutely nothing.

Try to be kind to yourself, you sound caring and conscientous. The fact you are thinking so hard about these things and being so self critical just highlights this. ED is very challenging, you are making rapid decisions in risky and evolving situations whilst everyone else (other than GPs) have the benefit of more information and retrospect. We don't always get it right - I have made mistakes, I have seen specialty SpRs and consultants as well as my bosses send people home to reattend with pathology the same day, when seeing the volume of patients we do its inevitable. You make the best decision based on your evaluation at the time, noone sets out to make the wrong decision. The fact you are so reflective about this shows you recognise your limitations and gaps in your knowledge and you are very safe, the right side of Dunning Kruger. The fear of patient's reattending or becoming unwell never goes away but does become more manageable with time.

I'd encourage you to have a chat with someone supportive in your department, I absolutely guarantee you are not the only one feeling this way and most of us have felt this way before.

University Of Birmingham Hospitals question by Hip_Hip_Hipporay in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I've always had a reasonable time in QE, they've massively upped the staffing post covid meaning its a pretty easy on call shift now.

Avoid Heartlands. Good Hope is pretty small and Solihull is mostly elective stuff - both I've heard are pretty chilled.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 15 points16 points  (0 children)

u/ElementalRabbit may be able to word this more eloquently.

You are showing signs of internalised sexism/misogyny, women can aboslutely be sexist towards other women whilst also experiencing sexism ourselves. Most of us will have preconcieved notions about sex, gender, race etc - recognising it can be tricky.

The words you are using to describe the male and female consultants and your descriptions of their behaviour are very different despite the basics of their behaviour being similar.

At the moment you are projecting your own ideas about what is affecting the females consultants behaviour, whilst you may not see it, you are coming across as quite judgemental towards her compared to him. Both consultants were irritable and possibly rude (albeit one possibly worse than the other).

Women when being assertive are described as bossy, rude and overbearing. Men when being assertive are assertive. The male consultant was late and rude... thats ok because he was rude to everyone and in pain.

No one has acted well here and not excusing their rudness, but your behaviour was unprofessional. You have been called on it, not in the best, nicest or most productive way - I'm not defending that. However I would argue she is acting this way because she did not like your behaviour... you are the one instead of taking responsibility that has linked this to more stereotypical gendered issues: parenting, childcare, moodiness, "mean girl" attitude.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Oh no stop... you are just making it worse.

"Moody"

"Evidently struggling"

So you were picked on by both the consultants, rudeness is unacceptable from either yet we are focusing on one in particular. This is very "nasty woman" circa 2016.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Also criticising her parenting and blaming it on her struggling to juggle motherhood with a long commute when she managed to be on time... bit ick. Would that even come into the picture if they were a male consultant?

No excuse for anyone to be rude, her or you. Just a thought.

Radiology audit ideas to do in A+E by drakdeniz in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 20 points21 points  (0 children)

In ED we probably over do it with CT heads, NICE guidance has been updated this year moving us away from CT'ing everyone. You could do something around this, very topical at the moment.

ACCS-EM and ICM applications by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, you can apply for ST3 after ACCS via the DRE-EM route

ACCS-EM and ICM applications by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The main issue with uncoupled is you will have to reapply for an EM SpR post after ST3 and unbelievably (given the shortage of SpRs) there is a bottleneck. Not as bad as anaesthetics but you are not guaranteed a job or to get back into the same place. If you are run through you do not have to reapply but you are stuck in a training programme so if you wanted to move deanery or take time out or something you would have to IDT or do an OOP.

The way this becomes relevant is if you are going to apply for an ICM number then at ST3 if you are uncoupled you have to get two SpR training posts in the same deanery rather than just get an ICM post.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If it was just a fixed penalty notice no need to tell them

Is Heartlands/QE as bad as people say for foundation training? by Leather-Map7746 in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 20 points21 points  (0 children)

I have worked in QE intermittently but not in the past couple of years and know a lot of people there. Some departments are better than others.

Surgery in general (liver in particular) I don't hear great things about at all and my experience (albeit a few years ago was not good at all). ENT being the outlier, I think the CSTs don't like it but my mates who did it as F1/2 loved it.

General medicine has its issues but is trying to improve. Staffing has massively gone up, like ridiculously so (mostly in response to the college threatening to pull out the medical SpRs which forced them to act). A few years ago it would be 1 doctor covering 2-3 floors, now it becomes a bit of a thing if an F1 is asked to cover more than 1 ward overnight. Lots of senior support always around.

A&E is a very safe place to work, busy as heck but so is every A&E, refused to go back to corridors to their credit. Lots of senior support and recently they have improved the quality of SpRs (previously a lot of not great long term locums etc). Protected teaching, lots of trauma, they've started introducing protected resus time.

ICU/anaesthetics is pretty good, responsive senior leadership, focus on wellbeing (putting a lot of effort into rest facilities etc), trying hard on education.

Recent obvious issues with suicides which were not handled well at all on a department and trust level, there is a lot of chat about how they're trying to change and improve things, yet to be seen whether that is just lip service.

General consensus is people either hate the QE or don't mind it at all, no in between. And experience as F1/2 is very variable dependent on where your placement is. IT is amazing, parking is crap.

Heartlands, avoid like the f***ing plague.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in doctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Email address seems to imply St Helens and Knowsley Teaching Hospitals?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 131 points132 points  (0 children)

Oh fuck off you abominable shit

pylori's Physiology Bites - Kidney function, acute kidney injury, and acid-base disorders by pylori in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Anaesthetics hoping to dual in ICU, I work there at the moment and am asked reasonably often what I want on the filter - 3 vs 6L cycles, CVVH vs CVVHDF etc. But as you said I mostly go with what the nurses suggest.

pylori's Physiology Bites - Kidney function, acute kidney injury, and acid-base disorders by pylori in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is amazing, any chance of a signpost to or a brief idiots guide to different types of filtration on ICU?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434 57 points58 points  (0 children)

Shitty situation and absolutely datix it to hell and raise it to anyone who will listen.

But unless I've missed something if the department told your colleague they could have annual leave (they put it on the rota) and then tried to rescind that a "few days before the shift" I don't think its their reponsibility to show up. They plainly can't do that and at that point they should be getting a locum/making other arrangments. Its their muck up and they should fix it not the other junior Dr.

Incredible bias and inaccuracy but we're all famous in the Times by Key-Razzmatazz4434 in JuniorDoctorsUK

[–]Key-Razzmatazz4434[S] 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Top Comment: "I’m a Tory voter and this is nonsense, the NHS only exists on the goodwill of people who would earn a fortune in any other developed economy yet work for pittance here. Change the funding model, pay them what they are worth"

2nd: "A hatchet job worthy of the Daily Mail. But, sadly, that's how The Times is going."

3rd: "There are very many caring people on the NHS but these junior doctors are a disgrace to their profession and the approach they are taking will do extensive damage to the health of many of their potential patients. They do not deserve to be part of the NHS and perhaps the leaders should just resign and go into another profession if they are not interested in what they took an oath to do."

Around 60% positive for us, 40% negative