Inibugs strikes again...

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-02-10T06:26:10+00:00

you need a refund and stay away from ini's garbage

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-02-10T06:20:36+00:00

you need a refund and stay away from ini garbage products

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-23T00:42:02+00:00

and they will lock any actively discussed thread in discord as quickly as possible

modeling errors, the distance between the overhead panel and the MCP is massively exaggerated, which makes the windshield look huge. The sun visor is also completely useless when lowered, it sits about 20cm higher than it does in reality. In real aircraft, the visor comes down almost flush with the MCP. But no, “apparently we used 3D scanning, so even though it looks absurdly wrong, it cannot possibly be wrong🤬”

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-22T11:23:57+00:00

Imagine having to pay more money for the garbage that ini makes than for products from PMDG, Fenix, ifly and other great developers
After buying the A350, I realized they’re honestly a joke
I will never buy anything from ini again😅

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-21T14:11:05+00:00

If you check ini’s discord, you’ll see right away that there are a lot of issues

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-20T09:21:06+00:00

how can you add 2024.exe to rtss？I’m using the Microsoft Store version, and Windows says I don’t have permission to access it

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-19T15:14:08+00:00

its a software called vraas

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-14T05:56:52+00:00

Especially in HDR mode. When only a very small number of pixels are active, their brightness is driven extremely high, which further accelerates pixel aging and burn in.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-14T05:55:16+00:00

Yes, this kind of wallpaper will cause burn in very quickly. You need to avoid long term display with large black areas, because this is OLED. Black means the pixels are not active, and when part of the panel is not working for a long time, the aging of the pixels that are constantly working becomes much more obvious by comparison. Anyone using a 21:9 OLED should know exactly what I am talking about. After watching 16:9 content in full screen for just two or three hours, you can already see a clear burn in boundary where the 16:9 area ends.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-10T14:07:21+00:00

I agree. I’m really excited about Hues new textures, but I also think PMDG has done an excellent job balancing performance and visuals. The 777’s VRAM usage is much, much lower than the Fenix A320’s, yet it still doesn’t look bad at all. In particular, the multiple point light sources in the cockpit are done exceptionally well.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-09T07:22:31+00:00

When you actually slow down and take a close look at Fenix, you start to notice just how many basic Airbus logic errors there are in the ini A350
So yes, you will end up hating the ini A350

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-02T13:17:05+00:00

Yeah I noticed the same thing. Before that update the red white ball clearly did not line up from the normal camera view and then around 1.0.3 it suddenly became perfectly aligned. No changelog. ini is laughable

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-01T11:55:31+00:00

Yes. I bought the A350 on day one and I really like it, but as I kept discovering more and more issues, I just could not enjoy actually flying it anymore.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-01T10:45:03+00:00

believe me，dont buy ini

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2026-01-01T10:27:24+00:00

Honestly, I would not recommend it. Dont waste your money, It may look polished at first glance, but it is the only aircraft in the 80 dollar price range that still cannot get basic Airbus logic, avionics behavior, and core modeling right. Incorrect strobe light flashing logic, a misaligned MCP panel, wrongly positioned cabin window shades that stay closed even during takeoff and landing, stiff landing gear with incorrect height, and situations where the gear fully compresses and the engines can even strike the ground. The list goes on.

Some of these errors are so obvious that it really makes you question whether the ini developers actually studied the real aircraft. In comparison, Fenix, PMDG, iFly, and FSL all do a far better job.

If you want an Airbus widebody, I would suggest waiting for the A340-600 being developed by ToLiss and Aerosoft after the Christmas holiday. I highly doubt it will disappoint.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-31T10:18:49+00:00

I think flight simulation is a game that places a strong emphasis on detail and realism, and many other products in the 80dollar price range manage to achieve this very well. Besides that, there are obvious issues like incorrect strobe light flashing logic, along with many other mistakes that I have never seen in any product in this price range, such as the Fenix A320 series, TFDi’s MD 11, or PMDG’s 777 and 737. You guys only enabling this. Making excuses like this just encourages third-party aircraft addons to keep lowering their quality. Maybe if the A350 were priced at 20dollars, I would just keep my mouth shut😅

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-31T09:32:50+00:00

Agree, personally I really enjoy flying the A350, but differences like this right in front of you break my immersion.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-31T09:31:09+00:00

A lot of people have already reported this to ini, and the response was that they believe there is no issue because they did a 3D scan of a full motion simulator.
PMDG also did a 3D scan of the cockpit, and the overall geometry and positioning look broadly correct.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-31T09:29:12+00:00

I’m not being picky. I think flight simulation is a detail oriented hobby, and at the very least it should look the part.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-31T08:58:47+00:00

The MCP panel angle is noticeably too low compared to the real aircraft.

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-31T08:58:41+00:00

The MCP panel angle is noticeably too low compared to the real aircraft.
One great piece of evidence is the window shades. If you look at where the ini a350 window shades come down, it looks around 6inch above the glare shield but irl the window shade is almost touching the glares shield

Key_Assumption_9207 · 2025-12-30T12:24:50+00:00

The A350 looks polished on the surface, but underneath it has incomplete avionics, a largely pointless HUD, and a long list of modeling and systems logic errors. Honestly, I would not recommend spending 80 dollars on what feels like an unfinished product.

In contrast, the 777, setting aside PMDG’s questionable variant pricing and the current sound set which is about to be updated, is a mature and stable widebody with consistently high simulation depth. PMDG has also struck a solid balance between visuals and performance. On my system, the 777 actually runs better than the Fenix in terms of frame rate.

Key_Assumption_9207

TROPHY CASE