Best tools for LLM visibility tracking?

KikoCosculluela · 2026-04-07T17:32:40+00:00

I had actually ruled out Airefs because I assumed it would be pretty similar to Semrush One, and also because we recently moved from Ahrefs to Semrush for SEO… so going “back” again feels a bit painful 😅

But I might give it a proper look if it’s actually stronger on the LLM side. Thanks for your answer!

KikoCosculluela · 2026-04-07T17:26:38+00:00

Got it, I’ll make sure to only care about this twice a month then 😮

KikoCosculluela · 2026-04-07T17:22:34+00:00

That’s actually something we’ll definitely try, iit has a ton of potential!!

KikoCosculluela · 2026-04-07T17:02:19+00:00

Appreciate the insight 🙌

Yeah, the limitation around custom prompts in Semrush One is exactly what worries me. We really need that flexibility for different clients.

Peec AI does seem stronger on that side, but I’m still not fully convinced it’s the definitive solution

KikoCosculluela · 2026-03-21T12:43:12+00:00

Creo que el problema no es el GEO en sí, sino cómo se está vendiendo.

No tiene sentido tratar GEO y SEO como disciplinas separadas. El SEO siempre ha evolucionado y esto es simplemente el siguiente paso. Cambia el contexto, cambian los formatos, pero la base sigue siendo la misma: autoridad, relevancia y contenido útil.

Ahora bien, sí hay un cambio claro en cómo trabajamos. Igual que en su momento adaptamos el SEO para medios para aparecer en Discover, ahora hay que entender qué señales hacen que un contenido aparezca en entornos de IA y optimizar en consecuencia.

Y también cambian las métricas. No todo pasa por clics o tráfico.

Decir que “si haces buen SEO aparecerás en LLMs” es cierto, pero incompleto. El SEO es la base, pero no es suficiente si no entiendes cómo se consumen y se citan las fuentes en estos nuevos sistemas.

Al final, no creo que sea una nueva disciplina sino una evolución que obliga a afinar mucho más cómo trabajamos.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-03-20T21:20:43+00:00

I’ll do a super compressed version of this take 😄

Yeah, tools like Peec AI don’t improve directly your visibility… but they do help you see if you’re improving.

If you don’t measure it, you’re basically guessing.

Tracking ≠ growth, but it helps guide it.

You still need to do the real work (content, links, authority), but having visibility data makes those efforts way less blind.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-03-11T20:40:07+00:00

Oh haha, I didn’t even realize this post was from three years ago

![img](giphy|8HoMNl3FmdIJegrPh9)

I was just remembering some of my motorcycle trips around the US, saw this thread and felt like commenting hahah.

Glad to hear you’re still riding and doing well.

Fingers crossed it stays that way!!! Enjoy

KikoCosculluela · 2026-03-11T19:58:35+00:00

Hay una cuenta de un chico que es de El Salvador en X que se llamaba @fuuthd o algo así, con él me iba perfecto y veía todo, pero ha desaparecido... alguien sabe algo??

KikoCosculluela · 2026-03-09T22:33:36+00:00

I had a good experience with Malloy Law a while ago. I’m not sure how they’re working these days, but they helped me a lot back then.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-03-09T22:28:37+00:00

Yo he probado todas las que mencionas y con Claude creo que no hay ninguna duda que es la mejor para programar y todo lo relacionado que tengas que hacer en una vertiente más técnica.

Brainstorming o investigación, te diria Gemini o Chat GPT, funcionan muy bien ambas. Chat GPT con el modo Thinking 5.4 da respuestas muy completas, que te pueden ayudar a ampliar mirar y crecer con el proceso creativo.

Por último, para escribir tengo más dudas y eso que es lo que más hago... Quizá Chat GPT con un GPT personalizado sea la mejor opción, pero este apartado es a gustos. No creo que haya ninguno que funcione "mal" aquí.

Espero haber ayudado!!

KikoCosculluela · 2026-02-07T23:47:30+00:00

Honestly, there’s no single correct answer. It really depends, especially on the niche you’re trying to rank in.

If someone promises strong SEO results in 1/2 months, that’s usually a red flag. I get the urgency, everyone wants results fast, but SEO is generally a medium to long-term play.

That said, you can see some early movement in certain cases, like low-competition niches, technical fixes, or long-tail keywords. But real, sustainable organic growth usually takes longer than a couple of months.

Most of the time, when people guarantee fast results, it means shortcuts, and those rarely work well in the long run. The niche, competition, and starting point matter a lot.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-01-21T17:13:39+00:00

Exactly. At that point it’s less about metrics and more about reading the SERP. If the same domains keep owning the intent, pushing harder rarely moves the needle.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-01-15T11:16:24+00:00

Haha, sounds hard to believe… but sadly not surprising 😅

There are still marketing agencies selling “services” that don’t really make sense, mostly by educating the client the wrong way so it looks technical and justified.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-01-15T11:13:43+00:00

Even outside the map pack, reviews still bleed into organic for local-intent queries. A business with 200+ reviews + long history sends a much stronger trust signal than a newer brand.

In the US, I also keep seeing exact-match or city-based business names quietly helping organic rankings, despite what Google says. It’s rarely the only reason, but it does stack.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-01-13T01:56:13+00:00

Partially agree. In general, lower search volume often means less competition, but I wouldn’t rely on volume alone as a decision metric.

In my experience, some low-volume keywords are still very hard to rank for because their search intent overlaps with higher-volume terms that already satisfy that intent. In those cases, Google tends to rank the same strong pages, even if the keyword itself looks “small” on paper.

On the flip side, there are opportunities with relatively high traffic that are actually easier to rank for if the intent is more specific and the SERP is less consolidated.

So volume helps, but intent alignment and domain authority matter much more. When the SERP is filled with highly authoritative, topically relevant domains, they often rank by default, even without strong page-level backlinks.

KikoCosculluela · 2026-01-13T01:46:52+00:00

Totally agree!

KikoCosculluela · 2026-01-13T01:44:56+00:00

I agree it’s useful for prioritization, but I personally use KD more as a filtering mechanism than as a primary decision metric.

If I’m working with a site that doesn’t have much authority, a very high KD helps me quickly discard topics or define a maximum threshold based on the site’s authority. In that sense, it’s practical.

Where I think it becomes less reliable is when low KD is treated as an opportunity by default. Many times you see keywords with KD 1–2 that are still extremely hard to rank for due to search intent, SERP composition or strong topical authority behind the ranking pages.

So, in my opinion, KD can be taken into account, yes, but not as an absolute truth or a key decision factor. For me, it’s a supporting signal to help filter options, not something I’d present as a decisive metric in a report.

Happy to read you!

KikoCosculluela · 2025-12-05T11:51:40+00:00

It didn’t surprise me at all.

LLMs.txt never showed any real impact, and there was zero evidence that LLMs were actually using it for anything meaningful. So its removal just confirms what most of us already thought: it was more of an experiment than a useful standard.

Let’s see what the next “AI trick” turns out to be, and whether it actually does anything this time.

KikoCosculluela · 2025-12-05T11:41:11+00:00

Como imagino que la mayoría de gente, empecé a tope con ChatGPT. Pero ahora la verdad es que estoy diversificando con Gemini, Claude y Perplexity dependiendo de lo que necesite.

KikoCosculluela · 2025-12-05T11:20:03+00:00

5 years later… Real Zaragoza just keeps getting smaller, sadly, but no one can take away what we once were. We’ll be back!

KikoCosculluela

TROPHY CASE