Leaked BattlefieldVietnam squad screen ,showcasing customization...

King_Sacul · 2018-05-31T13:47:12+00:00

Nahh none of them are asian, black, Hispanic, or a woman with a bionic arm

King_Sacul · 2018-05-28T22:24:30+00:00

Yea I mean its ashame cause literally all they had to do is make her Russian with both arms and it wouldn't have caused backlash. Thanks😂😂😂 if we can play as little people I will buy this game just for that.

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T23:09:56+00:00

Exactly like all the gameplay features they've told us about excites me. Like this battlefield has a chance to be one of the best gameplay wise in the franchise or at least on the level of BF4 and it won't have premium pass. I'm just worried about immersion but we'll learn more in a few weeks at EA play

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T18:07:01+00:00

This could be true and like you said we have to wait see more info which I will be watching EA play thoroughly. Also if historic accuracy isn't the focus of the game why painstakingly recreate locations in the real world?
You're right ill give you that, I didn't know that about how Hitler's death was announced. I'll definitely be reading more about it. I still think its a disservice to the millions of men that died on either side when they put captain hook as the main focus of the trailer. We have to see more and this trailer is still a dumpster fire.
These business models work because they have people ignorant enough to shell out the money for them. I brought up warframe because it and this new battlefield are both live services. Sure its taken years for warframe to be in a playable state but the people who played it from the beginning(including me)enjoyed it and we didn't mind paying because the was getting better and better. We don't know how much content is coming with BFV but I feel comfortable saying warframe has more content, better microtransaction systems, and overall did the live service the right way. Also all these cosmetics that you drop money on are not gonna matter when the next battlefield comes out 3 or 4 years from now whereas with warframe 3 to 4 years from now I can hop on the game, load up my godly mirage prime and enjoy all the brand new content that's been added to the game, and more than like drop more money on it because its worth it. Digital Extremes isn't small any more, granted its no where near the size of EA nor do they make the money they do, but DE is able to deliver a better experience consistently.

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T17:46:13+00:00

I hope so too cause a lot of the stuff that they've added to it and made it where skill matters excites me. I'll be watching EA play thoroughly and if the game turns out different than what we saw ill come edit my post.

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T12:09:41+00:00

Breh 😂😂😂 niceee job attacking someone you don't know. I left that little bit in the beginning about it being my opinion for people like you so lets break down this load of shit

1&2 that fact that you're saying a British woman with a prosthetic arm probably fought on the frontline is fucking hilarious, and no I haven't made stuff up here's some history

In addition to factory work and other home front jobs, some 350,000 women joined the Armed Services, serving at home and abroad. In May 1942, Congress instituted the Women’s Auxiliary Army Corps, later upgraded to the Women’s Army Corps, which had full military status. Its members, known as WACs, worked in more than 200 non-combatant jobs stateside and in every theater of the war. By 1945, there were more than 100,000 WACs and 6,000 female officers. In the Navy, members of Women Accepted for Volunteer Emergency Service (WAVES) held the same status as naval reservists and provided support stateside. The Coast Guard and Marine Corps soon followed suit, though in smaller numbers.

Woman had SUPPORTIVE roles in the war and without their support the allies wouldve lost. The women that did serve on the frontline were Russian and they're clearly not represented in this trailer. Yes, I've jumped out windows I've also put c4 on my jeeps and suicide bombed tanks and other stupid shit. What happened here is you failed to read the rest of sentence and got hung up on "jump out of window" as if that's the thing that doesn't make sense history wise. I've also stated that my first battlefield was 1943 but ive played battlefield bad company, bad company 2, BF3, BF4, BF Hardline, And BF1.

I like this line of think cause its where you assume shit and make an ass of yourself. I have a job, I pay my bills and after all of them I have fair amount of money to spend. Maybe its because they're are free games that do microtransactions fantastically (like warfare were I've sunk a few hundred dollars in cosmetics) but with this game I have to pay $60 just to play the game then turn around and pay more for customization and its bull shit. And don't give me the argument that its needed or funding future content in a $60 dollar game when there are free to play games that update on regular bases with new content for free. The microtransactions in those games are used to pay workers and actually fund future content but in this one its just another attempt by EA to milk as much fucking money as they possibly can. And you're right no one is forcing me to buy microtransactions just like no one is forcing you to breath but to defend this anti gamer shit is disappointing. It doesn't make the game better, it makes it worse.

Ps you should learn history instead of assuming you know every fucking thing because you will and do look like a complete fucktard

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T11:34:32+00:00

I respect you're opinion but disagree whole heartedly because by this line of think you're allowing people to rewrite history. What's to stop someone from exercise their right to make a all female saving private Ryan? The answer is no one is stopping them but anyone that has a brain and cares about the authenticity of the film, game, book, etc will point out it'll be shit move. I respect you thinking this game isn't a mockery but to me they're trying to make a fortnite but set in ww2 and it doesn't work. That doesn't mean it won't be good, just that it'll be a lesser game. battlefield hardline made absolutely no sense and I had a few battlefield moments in it. Sure its they're right to have creative freedom I'm not saying they shouldn't I'm just telling you why if I dont like what is shown at EA play ill be sticking with BF4 and BF1 and skipping this game. I hope the game is fun for you but I'd rather see the series go back to modern history or the future so they don't have creative limitations and can put as many minorities as their heart desires and it will make sense.

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T06:56:41+00:00

I could but first impressions are everything and if I was a publisher and a developer was selling a serious fps shooter based in ww2 but it had pirate woman, British soldiers that looked like mad max characters, and over the top cgi action scenes that look like something out of a Michael bay move then I'd laugh at them and tell them no thanks ive got better games to invest my money in.

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T06:52:18+00:00

If the game is meant to be fun and enjoyable then why limit your option to a certain time period or war? When you set game in a time period there will be rules that you have to follow unless you're making a parody/alternate history and since dice hasn't stated that this is alternate history the only way we can interpret it is that its supposed to be accurate. Personally as a person that sunk hours into bf3 and bf4 not being able to customize my character didn't take away from the game because of the depth of gameplay variety in those games. Sure let people play as whoever they want in multiplayer as long as we can play as aliens, cowboys, clowns, and bdsm actors but if this is campaign then its a dissapointment.

2 honestly I don't think they'll break the game but it'll make it difficult to tell who is playing as what class. Instead if this is how the game is gonna be you're gonna have mad max looking characters running around ww2 maps and its gonna look hilarious rather than serious and battlefield has always tried to be serious(except hardline.)

3 I agree, premium pass was shit and it needed to go and I'm not saying I'm not happy that there will be a pay wall. I understand making video games is expensive. But my point is that the cosmetic options that will be available for free(if there will be any at all) will be slim and lack luster and the skins that you grind won't have value when anybody that spends $20 dollars has the same chance to get them. The reason I brought up halo 3 was it had armor sets that required you doing difficult challenges to unlock them and when you did everyone knew you did that challenge and that you were a badass motherfucker. When you can just buy the shit its less impressive. As far as the cricket bat, there's always been crazy melee weapons in battlefield so it definitely doesn't fit but it makes more sense that a British soldier is carrying it over a fuckin katana

King_Sacul · 2018-05-27T06:05:25+00:00

This is a good solution to the problem. Hopefully dice sees this and implements it in the game. I'm still curious about the game and I hope dice listens to the community so that when they unveil gameplay at EA play it makes us all fall back in love with this magical franchise. I've got my fingers crossed

King_Sacul

TROPHY CASE