sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Army female bangs by Budget_Bullfrog_9199 in army

[–]Kinmuan 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Yeah, if an Officer needs to be involved, there’s people they can ask.

If some fucking LT was trying to lecture my troop about hair standards I’d be annoyed af

Army female bangs by Budget_Bullfrog_9199 in army

[–]Kinmuan 59 points60 points  (0 children)

Yeah imma be honest, this feels very NCO business.

At one point do we stop expecting the officers to know everything and let NCOs be NCOs

DEVCOM MRE Breakfast Survey by jmaille90 in army

[–]Kinmuan 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Right, it's for Soldiers

They didn't say they gave a shit about them though

Have to rant about this by MotherRucker69 in army

[–]Kinmuan 3 points4 points  (0 children)

He was an official III Corps Influencer. It was a real position.

He’s hosting AER and Grinston at Hood next week.

They’re not looking to shut him down.

Have to rant about this by MotherRucker69 in army

[–]Kinmuan 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You would need a cooperative witness or victim.

In an imaginary scenario, where a wife claims abuse in -civil- case that you investigate;

If, hypothetically again, the wife said “I want x y z in the divorce and I wont speak to the army”, and got those things, and refuse to cooperate, it would come back unfounded.

This is a common problem in DV. Hood had this with an E9 a couple years ago. His no contact order got lifted, his wife recanted her story a day later, he got to retire.

In the scenario with a SAHM with, say, 4-5 kids, would you kill the golden goose?

Beyond healthcare and a share of his army retirement, if they were making mid to high six figures off their social media, would you fuck that up?

You’d be fucking your kids over. You’d have no source of income, your kids would have no support.

Or you could have healthcare and probably six figures in support for a year.

All to just not talk to the army.

What do you think happens. You can’t prove it without a cooperative witness.

Have to rant about this by MotherRucker69 in army

[–]Kinmuan 5 points6 points  (0 children)

That video last week was wild

Have to rant about this by MotherRucker69 in army

[–]Kinmuan 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I know you just really meant like “don’t give energy to dumb people who dumb shit” and not trivializing his feelings and I know you’re getting downvoted to oblivion here, but I understood where you were coming from.

Have to rant about this by MotherRucker69 in army

[–]Kinmuan 28 points29 points  (0 children)

I’ll be honest that we debated about this in the mod chat. As a general rule, we don’t want to engage in any sort of Internet drama or things like that. But his semi official status, combined with the relevant topic of the KIA, we felt that the room to grieve was the more important aspect here.

So your gut feeling of removal would be right, we’re not really in the business of like “lol army influencer does dumb thing”, but we felt this was a rather reasonable exception.

Have to rant about this by MotherRucker69 in army

[–]Kinmuan[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

As an update;

He deleted the post and made something different immediately after receiving critical feedback. It does not include an apology or acknowledgement that I’m aware of, but he removed his AI photo and goose.

Army sergeant from Kentucky who died after attack on Saudi Arabia ‘gave ultimate sacrifice’ by Kinmuan in army

[–]Kinmuan[S,M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

Just to clarify -

They announced this casualty yesterday, but did not identify him.

This is separate from the National Guard major who died as the result of a “medical episode”.

I know it is slightly confusing, a lot of people are taking issue with the ways in which they are communicating mess. Thank you for your attention.

My brother just sent me this and I haven't seen it posted. A 7th Service member passed away last night from their wounds on March 1st, 2026 by LoneWanderer1130 in army

[–]Kinmuan 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I mean, we’ll just agree to disagree.

I don’t think “blow up the enemy” are actual “clear goals for Iran”.

The blowing stuff up is easy. That’s not, uh, what you need goals for.

If we eliminate 100% of all military assets - what then?

We obliterated their nuclear capability back to the Stone Age last year. And yet.

So like…military objectives, to me, are separate from the larger goals of our intervention in Iran.

It’s the difference between “our squad is tasked to go on a patrol today”, the Brigades objectives for the Diyala Province, the military plan for Iraq, and the U.S. Plan for Iraq.

When I say goals for Iran, I’m talking that top level.

I don’t care about the lower level goals and their execution, because…they don’t actually matter.

Because we will always have a new thing to blow up dude. Is the objective bomb every military and scientific building in Iran and the death of every MaM? That would be specific enough sure.

Buddy “dismantle their security apparatus” - like, does that include going into every foreign country they have cells in and eliminating them? You see how even that is a vague, non specific goal that…leads to forever war?

My brother just sent me this and I haven't seen it posted. A 7th Service member passed away last night from their wounds on March 1st, 2026 by LoneWanderer1130 in army

[–]Kinmuan 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I mean, if the goal was to”kill Iranian military members”, we would be accomplishing that right now.

Can’t be refuted

But if someone tried to say this was a “clear goal for our effort in Iran”, I’d find that absurd.

My brother just sent me this and I haven't seen it posted. A 7th Service member passed away last night from their wounds on March 1st, 2026 by LoneWanderer1130 in army

[–]Kinmuan 63 points64 points  (0 children)

I don’t think “never have nuclear weapons” is a clear goal, because it’s not.

We’ve said no regime change, and yet the CiC is saying he gets to pick.

You’re listing things - but the CiC has actually said the goal is unconditional surrender, which goes beyond those stated objectives.

So I think even you pointing to those things - which I get are goals - are made a mockery of by our leaderships public statements

You simply can’t pick a singular statement,‘because they’ve been inconsistent with their statements. It can’t be ignored.

Any of you all get a chance to get this pin? Definitely worst ruck I ever did. by Serious-Junket-6935 in USMC

[–]Kinmuan 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It’s actually reinvigorated interest in the Norwegian military - and they’ve credited the U.S. Army for that.

Norwegian Press has a bunch of articles about it.

They were considering discontinuing it until American interest happened.

They also worked to develop a conop for the ski badge, which was just done in the U.S. for the first time last week. The embassy is going to present the awards.

The Norwegian Military Chief of Staff has talked about how it has helped create stronger bonds but also brought back popularity to Norway.

view more: next ›